<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[can I remove `cloudron._domainkey`?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Can I remove cloudron._domainkey or change replace 'cloudron' with something else?</p>
<p dir="auto">Don't want to expose the system I'm using via DNS name.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/5700/can-i-remove-cloudron-_domainkey</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 09:34:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/5700.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:58:50 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to can I remove `cloudron._domainkey`? on Mon, 27 Sep 2021 18:34:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/murgero" aria-label="Profile: murgero">@<bdi>murgero</bdi></a> re-read, my response remains the same, sorry.</p>
<p dir="auto">You know the way security scanners (or script-kiddies) works, it's to scan the network (Internet), get hosts and they software; if there is zero-day on CloudRon or other not disclosed vulnerability, apply it across the hosts.<br />
Having DNS records showing that there is CloudRon here means you don't even need to scan for the ports, which just simplify things.</p>
<p dir="auto">Hope that helps to understand my response here.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36974</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36974</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[potemkin_ai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 18:34:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to can I remove `cloudron._domainkey`? on Sun, 26 Sep 2021 21:11:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/potemkin_ai" aria-label="Profile: potemkin_ai">@<bdi>potemkin_ai</bdi></a> I would recommend you re-read my response to you my friend. I did not say there was "no security risk in Cloudron".</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36933</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36933</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[murgero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2021 21:11:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to can I remove `cloudron._domainkey`? on Sun, 26 Sep 2021 18:30:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/murgero" aria-label="Profile: murgero">@<bdi>murgero</bdi></a> there is <strong>always</strong> a security risk; no software is safe from vulnerabilities, especially if security is not it’s primary focus (for example, like OpenBSD or qmail)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36917</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36917</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[potemkin_ai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2021 18:30:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to can I remove `cloudron._domainkey`? on Sun, 26 Sep 2021 18:26:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/scooke" aria-label="Profile: scooke">@<bdi>scooke</bdi></a> negative; customers knowing how to query DNS to see DKIM and understand that ‘cloudron’ is not some other tech voodoo is not my client; and those who won’t, won’t bother either.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36914</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36914</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[potemkin_ai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2021 18:26:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to can I remove `cloudron._domainkey`? on Sat, 25 Sep 2021 10:23:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/murgero" aria-label="Profile: murgero">@<bdi>murgero</bdi></a> It may not be for risk-aversion, but more that the person is providing a service without telling the customers that it is Cloudron (I'm not judging here, just postulating). So if customers could see that it was a Cloudron, and how simple it is, hey... they might skip the provider and use Cloudron themselves!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36875</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36875</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[scooke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2021 10:23:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to can I remove `cloudron._domainkey`? on Sat, 25 Sep 2021 02:33:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/potemkin_ai" aria-label="Profile: potemkin_ai">@<bdi>potemkin_ai</bdi></a> There is no security risk by having the name "Cloudron" in a dns record - cloudron is pretty branded and emails, apps, etc all have cloudron somewhere on them. Not to mention the login screen which is accessible everywhere.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36870</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36870</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[murgero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2021 02:33:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to can I remove `cloudron._domainkey`? on Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:39:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/girish" aria-label="Profile: girish">@<bdi>girish</bdi></a> thank you! Done.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36859</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36859</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[potemkin_ai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:39:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to can I remove `cloudron._domainkey`? on Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:05:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/nebulon" aria-label="Profile: nebulon">@<bdi>nebulon</bdi></a> yes, pretty much. 'cloudron' is just a way to avoid conflicts with existing DNS keys.</p>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/potemkin_ai" aria-label="Profile: potemkin_ai">@<bdi>potemkin_ai</bdi></a> Can you raise a feature request here - <a href="https://forum.cloudron.io/category/97/feature-requests">https://forum.cloudron.io/category/97/feature-requests</a> ? Also, see <a href="https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/4655/change-to-the-dkim-record-hostname-in-recent-version-caused-by-new-feature-or-from-using-no-ip-domain-provider">https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/4655/change-to-the-dkim-record-hostname-in-recent-version-caused-by-new-feature-or-from-using-no-ip-domain-provider</a> for a previous related discussion.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36801</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36801</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[girish]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:05:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to can I remove `cloudron._domainkey`? on Thu, 23 Sep 2021 11:20:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/nebulon" aria-label="Profile: nebulon">@<bdi>nebulon</bdi></a> thank you for the explanation!<br />
If so, I guess it shall be indeed unique and to make sure it doesn't expose software running on the server - rename-able...</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36795</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36795</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[potemkin_ai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 11:20:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to can I remove `cloudron._domainkey`? on Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:33:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/girish" aria-label="Profile: girish">@<bdi>girish</bdi></a> correct me if I'm wrong, but I guess the <code>cloudron</code> tag is there to avoid potential overlap with existing DNS records. Adding <code>cloudron</code> makes it very unlikely that such a record already exists, which we would overwrite.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36794</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36794</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[nebulon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:33:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to can I remove `cloudron._domainkey`? on Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:24:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/girish" aria-label="Profile: girish">@<bdi>girish</bdi></a> thank you. But why it has to have 'cloudron' prefix? It could be 'dkim._domainkey', isn't it?</p>
<p dir="auto">If so, where do I raise a feature request? And what are the chances it will be implemented anytime soon?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36788</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36788</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[potemkin_ai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:24:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to can I remove `cloudron._domainkey`? on Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:47:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/potemkin_ai" aria-label="Profile: potemkin_ai">@<bdi>potemkin_ai</bdi></a> the DNS entry is required for DKIM which is used to verify email signature when sending mails. If you don't need any of your apps sending email, you can delete the key. Otherwise, currently, it cannot be renamed but I guess you can raise a feature request to make it renameable.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36775</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.cloudron.io/post/36775</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[girish]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:47:30 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>