<![CDATA[Cubby is great!]]>Cubby is available on Cloudron now and under heavy development.

I tried it and found it was excellent for organizing files kept on a remote server, some of which you might be making available elsewhere.

Learning Cubby only takes a few moment, and it requires few resources.

I recommend it and hope more people find it useful too.

https://getcubby.org/

brave_Ge0rM7tkcE.jpg

]]>https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/7705/cubby-is-greatRSS for NodeMon, 15 Jun 2026 08:33:56 GMTThu, 22 Sep 2022 06:53:55 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Cubby is great! on Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:11:45 GMT]]>@timconsidine said in Cubby is great!:

@LoudLemur Understand the motivation and also the usefulness in certain use cases.
But (repeating another comment elsewhere) I like that Cubby is separate and reduces/eliminates any risk of "link bleeding" or hijacking of links.

I guess that if integration is implemented, it could just be disabled.
At least that is what I would request.
In that way its standalone / segregated implementation can be retained.

I didn't think of that. It would be important.

]]>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/53757https://forum.cloudron.io/post/53757Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:11:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cubby is great! on Fri, 23 Sep 2022 08:30:30 GMT]]>@LoudLemur @timconsidine We actually have such discussions quite often 🙂 Surfer, Cubby and File manager have 3 separate file manager systems by now and often we wonder if we should merge them all. Unfortunately, they all use different UI frameworks making it hard to componentize.

]]>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/53748https://forum.cloudron.io/post/53748Fri, 23 Sep 2022 08:30:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cubby is great! on Fri, 23 Sep 2022 08:11:11 GMT]]>@LoudLemur Understand the motivation and also the usefulness in certain use cases.
But (repeating another comment elsewhere) I like that Cubby is separate and reduces/eliminates any risk of "link bleeding" or hijacking of links.

I guess that if integration is implemented, it could just be disabled.
At least that is what I would request.
In that way its standalone / segregated implementation can be retained.

]]>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/53743https://forum.cloudron.io/post/53743Fri, 23 Sep 2022 08:11:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cubby is great! on Fri, 23 Sep 2022 07:44:50 GMT]]>@girish Thanks.

Cubby could possibly be integrated with Cloudron to provide its file browser...

When Cubby is run on Cloudron, it would be nice to see a "integrate with..." menu, which would connect Cubby with other applications running on the Cloudron.

]]>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/53738https://forum.cloudron.io/post/53738Fri, 23 Sep 2022 07:44:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Cubby is great! on Fri, 23 Sep 2022 07:38:27 GMT]]>We plan to develop it with a lot more speed in the coming months. But if you have some missing priority feature, let us know.

]]>https://forum.cloudron.io/post/53737https://forum.cloudron.io/post/53737Fri, 23 Sep 2022 07:38:27 GMT