Sadly, this is the way cal.com works. When you self-host it, you need to provision the apps you want your users to be able to use, which cannot be done after the initial install it seems. It might be worth asking upstream in their Github about options do amend this via CLI or otherwise.

@jordankrueger there was a recent update to the cal.com package, can you try that?

@jdaviescoates said in trouble adding Google Calendar to Cal.com App Store:

I did have that wrong, but even after correcting it still wasn't working... on Firefox.

So what was it supposed to be???

For embedding, usually you need a custom CSP - https://docs.cloudron.io/apps/#custom-csp

Oh, I just realized... I downloaded the code via the cloudron interface to try and figure out what's going on and came across this Readme.

It wasn't explcite until I found this....

alt text

I guess it's necessary to activate liscence to make the code work.

Well, that is what they seem to use all in one place for feedback too, so may as well start a new feedback or question thread.

I asked on Discord, but no new response there.

@sparkwise ah yes, that's what made me go down this route earlier as well. Unfortunately, I never found a fix for this. I think it requires some upstream fixes.

@luckow said in How do we fix the event start time? frustrating.:

TIme-slot intervals

Mr Luck. You the man!! Thank you.

I just posted a separate topic that might be part of the issue here, too: https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/10971/allowed_hostnames-environment-variable-breaks-app-startup

@necrevistonnezr said in License warning:

@micmc
Or did I misunderstand your point?

Nope, you've got me correctly.

Though I'd still disagree but, here we'd certainly be facing a very interesting point of interpretation 🙂

If you read correctly the license the term used is "to convey" and "conveying" "copies of the software" and only that could bring a headache or two. But, the added phrase "someone running Cloudron and making the software available to others" here above whether it's direct from the quote or added by you it is still only an interpretation of the license and not specifically stated as clearly as it may sound.

Hence, that's why I believe 'Cloudronners' would not necessarily enter the same category has the 'developer-provider'. Especially as those providing services with their Cloudron don't even modify nor touch the code in any way, moreover we know that the core codes in the Cloudron system are read only and thus not modifiable.

At the very worse, IF ever a client would CLAIM anything from the non-developer service provider through a system like Cloudron, in regards to getting a copy of the FOSS running on its server, what else can the provider do than tell him; "sure is the link to the developer's repository where you can find the latest updated copy of the software!?

All that said, I sure understand the other part's interpretation, and thus I can envision that cloudronners 'could' fall in the same category as developer-providers, however as explained my own interpretation is the opposite.

As usual, anyway, there's still a lot of place to debate in that field. 😉

doesn't say anything about being enterprise only

Oh

image.png

Nevermind then.

As far as the trick for an app that needs multiple pg databases, I think creating multiple schemas might work depending on if the db library used by the app supports setting the schema in the url or otherwise. Support for this feature seems patchy.

I guess you have to ask the upstream project about this.

Well the error is right, if you don’t have either of them then you can’t have admin privileges. If you set up a correct password you may be missing 2FA or the other way around, so it is an “or” 😄

Looks fine for us!

@derin seems to be some assets loading issue in calcom. If you restart the app, it shows the profile image!