Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps - Status | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. NocoDB
  3. Heads up: Nocodb is no longer open source.

Heads up: Nocodb is no longer open source.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NocoDB
2 Posts 2 Posters 111 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    umnz
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Beware: The latest release/update changes the license.

    https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/discussions/12891

    They're moving to a Sustainable Use License.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • necrevistonnezrN Offline
      necrevistonnezrN Offline
      necrevistonnezr
      wrote last edited by necrevistonnezr
      #2

      Thanks for heads up. It’s a switch to „source available“ and technically similar to a BUSL license.

      Same applies to e.g Hashicorp Vault, n8n, etc. on Cloudron as mentioned before. Other examples with similar licenses are MongoDB, Kibana, Elasticsearch, Redis…

      What is not allowed anymore: If you‘re running Cloudron and let your users use NocoDB (and even let the, pay for such access / use), you‘re making available the software as a service - in direct competition to NocoDB itself, btw, who provide such paid access / use themselves.

      Sad to read why it happened here (from your link), partly because AI makes it so easy:

      Bad actors take our work and sell it as their own, with no intention of complying with AGPLv3. Our engineers have been consulted innumerable times now to help on what appear to be private forks, where code that should be open remains hidden. The approach itself has been so maligned that they withheld that its a private fork until the last moment. And it is not only small players. Companies with significant resources, backed by reputable investors, have chosen this path too. We have prompted them about the license. It has been of no use. With the advent of coding LLMs, exploitation no longer requires any technical skill for a repo. It requires only bad intention. The burden of proving, fighting, and funding that battle falls entirely upon us.

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Bookmarks
      • Search