Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Vaultwarden
  3. Vaultwarden 1.2.4 released

Vaultwarden 1.2.4 released

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Vaultwarden
2 Posts 2 Posters 438 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • necrevistonnezrN Offline
    necrevistonnezrN Offline
    necrevistonnezr
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I usually don't create a new topic for every new version anymore, but this announcement could be relevant for Cloudron:

    Basic ratelimit for user login (including 2FA) and admin login

    Could that interfere with the built-in rate limiting of Cloudron?
    https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.24.0

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • nebulonN Away
      nebulonN Away
      nebulon
      Staff
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I don't think it is an issue, however essentially the more restrictive setting (Cloudron or app) will hit first. Looking at the changes at vaultwarden, their defaults are a lot more restrictive than the ones we have set in iptables as a generic default.

      I also think this makes much sense. Some apps may require more stringent measures others don't. So while having a basic line of defense from the platform, the apps can add on top where applicable, since only they know which routes to protect more and which are for example just public routes which just have to be prevented from a denial of service attack.

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Bookmarks
      • Search