Hey Guys,
We experimented with putting some user limits on our subscription plans. But it looks like this interferes with the business model of some of our upstream customers and also interferes with how we count users across apps and Cloudron itself. To avoid all the confusion, we have simply removed user limits from all plans. Same goes for app limits - there is no limit anymore (but there is still a restriction of more than 5 instances of the same app).

In the end, we still need a way to distinguish between personal and business use. For this reason, we have now tried put some of the apps are premium apps. Premium apps is simply based on our understanding that those apps are usually run by small teams/companies. Besides, those apps also require quite some work for us to manage compared to the rest.

Current users will be grandfathered to a plan which is the equivalent of the current business plan with no change in pricing.

Comments welcome!

Cloudron 3 is now available for all. You can read more in our blog post

Highlights:

• Signed releases
• Domain redirection
• Encrypted incremental backups
• Arbitrary subdomain installations
• Improved User & Group management UI

@malvim The retry is done automatically by us. You will get a notification if the retry failed. I can see here that a payment from your did go through about a hour ago.

The error was a migration issue upstream. More info is at:
https://github.com/monicahq/monica/issues/1626
https://github.com/monicahq/monica/pull/1673
https://github.com/monicahq/monica/issues/1667

https://github.com/monicahq/monica/issues/1667#issuecomment-411673213

Yes, this is now solved.

https://github.com/monicahq/monica/issues/381 is the security concern.

Using the ID can allow people to get a very good sense of how many users are on the system and the amount of contacts. It also is information leakage because I know all the URLs for every contact.

I think using a hashid based on the contact id, the user creating it and maybe another factor would work great.

Yes, @doodlemania2
https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/suitecrm-app is in decent shape. Still requires some finishing touches (https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/suitecrm-app/issues). You can test it out!

We are rolling out Cloudron 3.0!

Just tried this and it works for me.

Note that I too see the following message in my logs:

Aug 02 17:29:34 my.smartserver.space dockerd[20759]: time="2018-08-02T17:29:34Z" level=info msg="loading plugin "io.containerd.snapshotter.v1.btrfs"..." module=containerd type=io.containerd.snapshotter.v1
Aug 02 17:29:34 my.smartserver.space dockerd[20759]: time="2018-08-02T17:29:34Z" level=warning msg="failed to load plugin io.containerd.snapshotter.v1.btrfs" error="path /mnt/volume_sfo2_01/docker/containerd/daemon/io.containerd.snapshotter.v1.btrfs must be a btrfs filesystem to be used with the btrfs snapshotter" module=containerd
Aug 02 17:29:34 my.smartserver.space dockerd[20759]: time="2018-08-02T17:29:34Z" level=warning msg="could not use snapshotter btrfs in metadata plugin" error="path /mnt/volume_sfo2_01/docker/containerd/daemon/io.containerd.snapshotter.v1.btrfs must be a btrfs filesystem to be used with the btrfs snapshotter" module="containerd/io.containerd.metadata.v1.bolt"

But the above error is harmless. It is just saying that for btrfs plugin we need btrfs volume. This can be ignored since Cloudron does not use btrfs plugin.