Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Vaultwarden
  3. Caveat: Possibly relevant changes with Vaultwarden 1.2.9

Caveat: Possibly relevant changes with Vaultwarden 1.2.9

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Vaultwarden
2 Posts 2 Posters 432 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • necrevistonnezrN Online
      necrevistonnezrN Online
      necrevistonnezr
      wrote on last edited by necrevistonnezr
      #1

      Are these relevant for us?
      See https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.29.0

      Major changes and New Features

      • WebSocket notifications now work via the default HTTP port. No need for WEBSOCKET_ENABLED and a separate port anymore.
        The proxy examples still need to be updated for this. Support for the old websockets port 3012 will remain for the time being.
      • Mobile Client push notification support, see #3304 thanks @GeekCornerGH!
      • Web-Vault updated to v2023.5.0 (v2023.5.1 does not add any improvements for us)
      • The latest Bitwarden Directory Connector can be used now (v2022.11.0)
      • Storing passkeys is supported, though the clients are not yet released. So, it might be we need to make some changes once they are released.
        See: #3593, thanks @GeekCornerGH!
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • girishG Offline
        girishG Offline
        girish
        Staff
        wrote on last edited by
        #2

        I noticed that since I was updating the app just now. Turns out, the package never supported websockets to start with. So, looks like websocket will now work on the main port!

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • nebulonN nebulon marked this topic as a question on
        • nebulonN nebulon has marked this topic as solved on
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Bookmarks
          • Search