Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Vaultwarden
  3. Caveat: Possibly relevant changes with Vaultwarden 1.2.9

Caveat: Possibly relevant changes with Vaultwarden 1.2.9

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Vaultwarden
2 Posts 2 Posters 498 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • necrevistonnezrN Offline
    necrevistonnezrN Offline
    necrevistonnezr
    wrote on last edited by necrevistonnezr
    #1

    Are these relevant for us?
    See https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.29.0

    Major changes and New Features

    • WebSocket notifications now work via the default HTTP port. No need for WEBSOCKET_ENABLED and a separate port anymore.
      The proxy examples still need to be updated for this. Support for the old websockets port 3012 will remain for the time being.
    • Mobile Client push notification support, see #3304 thanks @GeekCornerGH!
    • Web-Vault updated to v2023.5.0 (v2023.5.1 does not add any improvements for us)
    • The latest Bitwarden Directory Connector can be used now (v2022.11.0)
    • Storing passkeys is supported, though the clients are not yet released. So, it might be we need to make some changes once they are released.
      See: #3593, thanks @GeekCornerGH!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • girishG Offline
      girishG Offline
      girish
      Staff
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I noticed that since I was updating the app just now. Turns out, the package never supported websockets to start with. So, looks like websocket will now work on the main port!

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • nebulonN nebulon marked this topic as a question on
      • nebulonN nebulon has marked this topic as solved on
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Bookmarks
      • Search