Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Change Detection
  3. "BrowserType.connect_over_cdp: Timeout 60000ms exceeded" error

"BrowserType.connect_over_cdp: Timeout 60000ms exceeded" error

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Change Detection
resourcescpuramperformancetimeout
16 Posts 2 Posters 775 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jamesJ Offline
    jamesJ Offline
    james
    Staff
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Hello @p44
    When I visit changedetection.io even the browser loads for almost 60000ms to load all content.

    9de75038-1c07-4d49-bf8c-02ace476c925-image.png

    So I am assuming now that this is simply an issue of the site itself being slow and truly triggering a timeout in the app.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • P Offline
      P Offline
      p44
      translator
      wrote on last edited by p44
      #3

      @james is going to be happen to about 1/3 of checked websites... I don't think is nornal... Never had this issue before...

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jamesJ Offline
        jamesJ Offline
        james
        Staff
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Hello @p44

        @p44 said in "BrowserType.connect_over_cdp: Timeout 60000ms exceeded" error:

        Never had this issue before...

        I've also created a setup and was running it since my last post.
        I had zero failures for 23 web pages.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • P Offline
          P Offline
          p44
          translator
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Very strange, could be a resource allocation issue? @james

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jamesJ Offline
            jamesJ Offline
            james
            Staff
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Hello @p44
            Could be but could also be some sites throttling this specific agent after some time.

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jamesJ james

              Hello @p44
              Could be but could also be some sites throttling this specific agent after some time.

              P Offline
              P Offline
              p44
              translator
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              @james Ok thanks a lot ... or maybe some broken update... I should open a ticket on their GitHub area

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Offline
                P Offline
                p44
                translator
                wrote on last edited by p44
                #8

                @james Some other user opened an issue: https://github.com/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io/discussions/2593 Please have a look. Thanks

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jamesJ Offline
                  jamesJ Offline
                  james
                  Staff
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  @p44
                  This person had a solution for himself => https://github.com/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io/discussions/2593#discussioncomment-13567391
                  Might be also helpful to you.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Offline
                    P Offline
                    p44
                    translator
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @james thanks, what is the standard value for FETCH_WORKERS in Cloudron?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jamesJ Offline
                      jamesJ Offline
                      james
                      Staff
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      It seems Cloudron sticks to the default:

                      https://github.com/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io/blob/58e2a41c9558a242e732320af4ab0b0ae6efe326/changedetectionio/realtime/README.md?plain=1#L107

                      | `FETCH_WORKERS` | `10` | Number of async workers for watch processing |
                      

                      Also there is this line:
                      https://github.com/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io/blob/58e2a41c9558a242e732320af4ab0b0ae6efe326/changedetectionio/flask_app.py#L596

                          # Start the async workers during app initialization
                          # Can be overridden by ENV or use the default settings
                          n_workers = int(os.getenv("FETCH_WORKERS", datastore.data['settings']['requests']['workers']))
                      

                      Which is also confirmed by the web ui:
                      a2d6bec2-5dac-49db-8adb-8f0fac7424e7-image.png

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • P Offline
                        P Offline
                        p44
                        translator
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        @james Thanks. I changed value to "2" on the web UI, let see what will happen.

                        Thanks a lot for your patience and your support, James

                        jamesJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • P p44

                          @james Thanks. I changed value to "2" on the web UI, let see what will happen.

                          Thanks a lot for your patience and your support, James

                          jamesJ Offline
                          jamesJ Offline
                          james
                          Staff
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          @p44 said in "BrowserType.connect_over_cdp: Timeout 60000ms exceeded" error:

                          Thanks a lot for your patience and your support, James

                          No worries! That's what I'm here for.
                          Also, don't thank me yet, the issue is not resolved yet.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • P Offline
                            P Offline
                            p44
                            translator
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            @james thanks again. I confirm problem is solved reducing value to "2".

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • jamesJ Offline
                              jamesJ Offline
                              james
                              Staff
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              Hello @p44
                              Great to read!
                              Do you mind sharing the server hardware specifications, and what resources limits you have set for the app?
                              This might be useful for future readers to get an idea of resource loads.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P Offline
                                P Offline
                                p44
                                translator
                                wrote on last edited by p44
                                #16

                                @james for sure:

                                Hetzner vServer
                                CPU4 Core "AMD EPYC-Milan Processor"
                                Memory16.37 GB RAM & 4.29 GB Swap
                                Cloudron v8.3.2 on Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS
                                Allocated Ram: 4GB
                                Websites monitored: 150 each 12 hours

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Bookmarks
                                • Search