Bug: 500 Error when viewing files via direct link in GitLab web viewer

[timwedde]

I've recently been encountering this and figured I would report it here.

This seems to occur because of how GitLab is packaged for Cloudron as I was unable to reproduce this issue on gitlab.com proper.
However, I was able to trigger this issue on both Cloudrons I manage as well as on the official Cloudron GitLab instance as well.

The error manifests when attempting to view a file via the built-in editor in GitLab. Navigating to a file via the interface works, but if you reload the file once it's open or alternatively navigate to its link directly, you will be greeted with a 500 error.

Example link:
https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/gitlab-app/-/blob/master/README.md

In the logs this manifests as such:

Completed 500 Internal Server Error in 63ms (ActiveRecord: 3.7ms | Elasticsearch: 0.0ms | Allocations: 12843)
  
ActionView::Template::Error (Can't find entry point 'monaco' in webpack manifest):
    2: - page_title @blob.path, @ref
    3: - signatures_path = namespace_project_signatures_path(namespace_id: @project.namespace.full_path, project_id: @project.path, id: @last_commit, limit: 1)
    4: - content_for :prefetch_asset_tags do
    5:   - webpack_preload_asset_tag('monaco', prefetch: true)
    6: 
    7: .js-signature-container{ data: { 'signatures-path': signatures_path } }
    8: 

I found some things on the GitLab issue tracker about rebuilding frontend caches/packages but am not entirely sure how to achieve this (or whether it would actually help in this case) so any advice (or a potential fix) would be appreciated.

[nebulon]

@timwedde thanks for the report, with the directly link it is easy to reproduce. Indeed looks like a build or rebuild step which might be lacking in the package. We have to investigate.

[andreas]

@nebulon Is this error opening files in the GitLab editor also the same? I attached a video from our Cloudron GitLab instance.

Recording

[plusone-nick]

@timwedde also noticed this after recent package update, was meaning to getting around to making a post on it. Thanks for the detailed report! +1

[nebulon]

We have published a new app package with a fix for this.

[andreas]

@nebulon Works. Thanks for the fast fix.

[timwedde]

@nebulon Can confirm as well, thanks for the quick turnaround!