@will thanks for taking time to explain your vision of open source
I understand all you said, but I think you missed all the point, it's a question of political here.
You say I don't understand open source... no I perfectly understand it, maybe I asked the wrong question, and packaging an app with another licence may be legal as Amazon, Google or Microsoft does.
It's my opinion but doing open source with the same goals and same models than any GAFAM is not very the mind / ethic of "libre" licences like GPL / AGPL.
I won't blame you any longer for doing it, just do it if you think it's good for you. But consider there is more than developers and people class which would like to afford the privilege of having time of learning dev ops or admin system.
I'm also a developer, a woman (yes it's very important to precise it if you know of it's hard for woman or every oppressed minority to give their opinion in developers communities), and I know perfectly how time and energy are precious, but I also know that all the world does not turn around a buisiness, that's also why open source / libre softwares exist.
Now, if I posted here it was in hope this point was not missed, forcing people to pay something open source and not consider where they're from and their goal is a non-productive way.
The communication of Cloudron is unclear and can be a kind of trap.
Again, if it was for a buisness I would have paid 15$ per month for sure to support developers, but for a collective unpaid and volunteer cause, nope it's kind of abusive.