Fizzy on Cloudron - the Kanban tracking tool for issues and ideas by 37signals

[pathab]

• Main Page: https://www.fizzy.do/
• Git: https://github.com/basecamp/fizzy
• Licence: O'Saasy License
• Dockerfile: ?
• Demo: https://www.fizzy.do/

---

• Summary: Kanban as it should be, not as it has been. Fizzy is a fresh take on cards and columns, with a few twists, human-nature inspired defaults, and a vibrant interface that’s the opposite of the bland and boring software the industry has been flinging at you for years.

---

• Notes: Really like the idea and the concept and love to selfhost on my cloudron.

---

• Alternative to / Libhunt link: Trello, Asana, Jira,
• Screenshots:

[andreasdueren]

Not sure if the license is compatible with cloudron:

No licensee or downstream recipient may use the Software (including any modified or derivative versions) to directly compete with the original Licensor by offering it to third parties as a hosted, managed, or Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) product or cloud service where the primary value of the service is the functionality of the Software itself.

[jdaviescoates]

@andreasdueren said in Fizzy on Cloudron - the Kanban tracking tool for issues and ideas by 37signals:

where the primary value of the service is the functionality of the Software itself.

I guess it depends on what this bit means?

The primary value of a Cloudron server would not become the functionality of Fizzy itself, even if Fizzy were in the Cloudron app store.

Reads to me like "don't directly compete with us, otherwise fine".

[timconsidine]

I agree with @jdaviescoates

My reading of that licence wording is the user who installs Fizzy to Cloudron must not then sell / rent access to their Fizzy instance as a service (competing with original Licensor).

Basically own (personal/group/business) use internal to the Cloudron hoster is OK, but they must not provide access as a paid SaaS.

I don't recalll which other app on Cloudron has similar provisions, but I am pretty sure there's at least one like that.

[necrevistonnezr]

Hashicorp (now IBM) Vault (and all other Hashicorp products such as Terraform) e.g. has a similar license, the BUSL.
Other examples with similar licenses are MongoDB, Kibana, Elasticsearch, Redis…

Here’s a good overview: https://www.goodwinlaw.com/en/insights/publications/2024/09/insights-practices-moving-away-from-open-source-trends-in-licensing

[pathab]

I’ve just finished packaging Fizzy for Cloudron myself and the app is already running great on my instance

If anyone is interested, here are the Git repo and Docker image:
Git: https://github.com/patattzel/fizzy-cloudron
Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/r/pathab/fizzy-cloudron

It’s still a bit quick and dirty, but fully functional. Features like “first user becomes admin” and disabled signup are already implemented. More refinements will follow.

Regarding the license discussion:
From my perspective, this should not be an issue for Cloudron. Cloudron isn’t offering Fizzy as a hosted SaaS product. It simply enables users to self-host the software on their own servers.

[necrevistonnezr]

True, not a problem for Cloudron; but as with other such licensed software, it can be a problem for those Cloudron customers who are providers or resellers themselves.

[pathab]

Good point.

It would actually be helpful if apps with such licenses were explicitly marked in Cloudron, or if there were a setting/flag for reseller environments to warn about license restrictions before installation.

[zonzonzon]

I tried fizzy; overall it’s very simple, and it keeps our minds from being distracted by too many features. However, I think that at its current stage of development, the chance that the Cloudron team will package this app is extremely low.

[jdaviescoates]

@zonzonzon said in Fizzy on Cloudron - the Kanban tracking tool for issues and ideas by 37signals:

However, I think that at its current stage of development, the chance that the Cloudron team will package this app is extremely low.

Why, given that @pathab has already packaged it?

[pathab]

I’ve actually been running Fizzy on my own Cloudron instance continuously since the start of this forum thread.

The project has seen a lot of updates since then and is being actively pushed forward. So far I haven’t had any issues keeping my fork in sync with the latest releases, and the recent versions have been stable for me in day-to-day use.

If anyone wants to try it out themselves, you can install it on your own Cloudron instance via the Cloudron CLI with:

cloudron install --image pathab/fizzy-cloudron:latest

So from a packager’s perspective, it’s been very workable and maintainable.

[timconsidine]

So from a packager’s perspective, it’s been very workable and maintainable.

Well done !

@pathab said in Fizzy on Cloudron - the Kanban tracking tool for issues and ideas by 37signals:

If anyone wants to try it out themselves,

the user will also need the relevant CloudronManifest.json as well, and maybe any files it references (e.g. POSTINSTALL.md).

I can add it to my custom app installer a bit later, unless you prefer me not to do so.