Tymeslot - Better Meeting Scheduling than cal.com

[jdaviescoates]

Sounds like it's not quite "better than Cal.com" (yet, at least)

[ekevu123]

I couldn't reproduce the github issue, but the rest is fixed. Getting there! It is, after all, still in a beta version, fortunately, having users pointing out issues that I can fix, so it's already pretty advanced.

[fbartels]

@ekevu123 it is this GitHub button which generates the 404:

The url it links to is:
https://github.com/login/oauth/authorize?client_id=Iv23liO6V8UT2lltQbw6&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Ftymeslot.app%2Fauth%2Fgithub%2Fcallback&response_type=code&scope=user%3Aemail&state=k48T-Q4bngldlgP1Sh2dSVyUHd8QQF8g3teeNc6uII0

@jdaviescoates everything needs to start somewhere.

@ekevu123 A nice additional feature would be to get calendars via ews.

[jdaviescoates]

@fbartels said:

@jdaviescoates everything needs to start somewhere.

Yeah, and tbh it looks like this is a really great start

[ekevu123]

The app can be installed now via CloudronVersions:
https://github.com/Tymeslot/tymeslot/blob/main/CloudronVersions.json

[LoudLemur]

@ekevu123 said:

I'm the developer of Tymeslot, and I built Cloudron support in from the start. The cloud version is hosted on Cloudron right now. The app also supports authentication with Cloudron accounts and uses the postgres and sendmail addons.

Hey, that is great! Thank you very much! I wish there were more developers like you. When you chat with other devs, do you mention Cloudron to them? What is there reaction? Have they heard of it?

[ekevu123]

No, they rarely have. There are so many deployment strategies out there, but I think cloudron would solve someone's problems sometimes even better.

[LoudLemur]

WanderingMonster packaging report: Verdict: Moderate.

https://paste.wanderingmonster.dev/?968a273a702c96da#BheknpBPP1aTHG9TTBntKPht3fXBwBTJ1GXzLehfnPCg

[jdaviescoates]

@LoudLemur it's already packaged and was literally built for Cloudron. Your monster evidently needs a lot more training.

[LoudLemur]

Haha! The "monster"! The monster should have checked if it was already published, right!

I would like to know from anybody involved in the packaging if the rating "moderate" was appropriate. Would any of these notes have actually saved you time, if you can remember?

[ekevu123]

@LoudLemur said:

WanderingMonster packaging report: Verdict: Moderate.

https://paste.wanderingmonster.dev/?968a273a702c96da#BheknpBPP1aTHG9TTBntKPht3fXBwBTJ1GXzLehfnPCg

Being the app developer, I must say the report is quite inaccurate and full of assumptions (e.g. "probably the backup size isn't big, but who knows").

I'd be surprised if anyone finds this helpful.

[LoudLemur]

@ekevu123 Hey, thanks for developing this application! Thanks also for being on Cloudron - it is brilliant to have developers interested in having their applications packaged. Thank you also for your feedback on the automated report.

It is beginning to look like this "Wandering Monster's" days are numbered!