For those that would be interested. I have just created a live stream on Youtube for Sunday 21.06. 14:00 (CET). During that stream I want to show a bit how to make a Cloudron app and will use Matterbridge as the example for it.
I would timebox the whole stream to a max of two hours, lets see how far I'll get in that time, maybe I won't even need that much time.
There will be an unedited recording of the stream later on.
You can follow the stream at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKcH2yJiLUo
Hi,
I'm thinking about creating a Cloudron app that uses fetchmail to fetch external mailboxes and deliver their mails to local accounts. Depending if I find a good example for a config ui this would then be configurable either from a small web ui or by simply editing the fetchmailrc file from the console.
Anyone else interested?
Hello everyone. See you on half an hour at https://youtu.be/RKcH2yJiLUo!
@msbt said in Proposal: Free-Tier Alterations 
:
Not sure if paying for updates defeats the purpose of having a secure system with rolling auto-updates
Exactly. I think it's bad practice to hide things like updates and 2FA behind an extra paywall.
Plus it was like this in the past already and was changed for the very same reason: you don't want to have people with vulnerable old versions out in the wild.
Hi,
I am not using it myself, but could imagine this being useful to others. Looking at their deployment structures this only needs node and a postgres database.
@girish said in What's coming in 6.4:
I added a last item "Make it easy to install non-app store apps".
That is great news. In case you do not yet have a better idea how this could be designed, I want to pitch the way this is organised in Portainer again. I explained it already a while back in https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/4485/proposal-the-cur-cloudron-user-repository/14?_=1626194230000. Basically a local admin can override/extend the entries from their official "appstore". Additional entries are defined in a json structure. When opening the Cloudron appstore it makes a request to https://my.cloudron.host/api/v1/appstore/apps which gets a json response with all the appstore data. What if opening the store would in addition to this also make a request to https://user:password@store.my.domain/apps.json and also show a category "community" that lists apps from this json listing. Plus points if the listing can be password protected (like the private docker registry). This could also be a nice revenue model for external app developers.
I recently talked to the CEO of Humhub and also made him aware of Cloudron and this topic. He said that they are currently busy with investigating ways to automate deployments in container scenarios and once that is solved they would be open to collaborate on an app for Cloudron.
Replying here since this is the largest collection of ldap specific topics on this forum.
My cloudron installation is around longer than the cloudron external ldap support. When configuring an external ldap users with a conflicting username (same username already exists on cloudron) get skipped on synchronisation. Which is generally a good thing. But I still wanted to transfer password management for some of these users to my ldap.
This can be done by running the following command from the shell of the cloudron host (only change the-user-i-want-to-change to the actual user):
mysql -uroot -ppassword -e 'update users set source="ldap" where username="the-user-i-want-to-change";'
@marcusquinn said in Why not make Cloudron fully open source again?:
GPL v3 covers commercial interests nicely
Yes, but only when the other party offers downloads of the product. Not when it's only hosted publicly (the installed product). In the latter case agpl would ensure that code is being made available.
But usually and honesty a lot people (if they contribute or not) only care about the freedom aspect, and there gpl or agpl are not sufficient enough for some people.
In essence, the type of license should also be dependent on the audience of developers you want to attract by at.
@ei8fdb said in Joplin Server not Responding (2.6.12):
The device time drift is 581488ms (Max allowed: 10ms)
I would guess the value of "100" for MAX_TIME_DRIFT is still milliseconds, which would mean the value is too small for your drift. The root cause for you however seems to be that the time on your server is simply lagging behind/infront. I would check if ntp is properly setup and running. 581488ms means your system is off by almost 10 minutes and this could also cause issues with tokens issued by other services.
@jdaviescoates said in Recommendations for document signing applications:
Nextcloud recently added this:
By the looks of it this is only an integration of a third party service into the Nextcloud ui.
The app uses eID Easy as its signing back-end. eID Easy handles the signing process. Refer to eID Easy's pricing to see the cost of each signing method.
I have meanwhile made the app public so anybody can now install it from my git repo. It can be found at https://github.com/fbartels/cloudron-drone-app
Since I have seen someone else also starting to work on a Drone app for Cloudron I have decided to make the app public.
It can be found at https://github.com/fbartels/cloudron-drone-app
In the Postfix world this feature is called "always bcc", but it does not look like something like this exists out of the box in Haraka.
We have run into the same issue this morning. But running node 16.13.0-deb-1nodesource1 (which is current version from their repo).
After a downgrade of the cloudron cli to 4.11.0 the login succeeded.
Hi @arjunkumar09,
is that question actually coupled with your usage of Cloudron or are you running a completely different stack?
Generally speaking however Nginx is know to scale better for large setups.
@nebulon said in Request: Support for HTML5 History:
I guess somehow this can already made to work if you rename your index.html to 404.html
That could actually work.
The challenge with single page apps is that you need rewrite rules to make requests to /somepath/page actually be handled by your index.html.
Microsoft has joined the game as well https://code.visualstudio.com/blogs/2021/10/20/vscode-dev
@timconsidine I do not have any hard requirements, but it would certainly be useful when the persons knows how to work the cli and install custom apps on Cloudron. The less users, probably the better.