Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Discuss
  3. Mounted filesystem for backup (low bandwith) - optimize sshfs read/write transactions

Mounted filesystem for backup (low bandwith) - optimize sshfs read/write transactions

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Discuss
sshfsbackups
4 Posts 2 Posters 813 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MallewaxM Offline
    MallewaxM Offline
    Mallewax
    wrote on last edited by girish
    #1

    I have just established to mount my home server via sshfs as a backup source. While there are obvious drawbacks It works nicely so far and I want to continue to give it a try.
    In view of the more limited bandwidth I have come to realize that the cloudron backup service creates a box.tar.gz on the mounted (limited bandwidth) network share and then copies this file from the mounted share to another directory on the very same mounted share.

    I am wondering if this transaction can be optimized in order to be mindful of low bandwith situations?!? E.g. create the box. tar.gz file in a tmp directory on the cloudron server and then copy it to the network share (that should save the read and write transactions from the network share, shouldn't it?)
    Screen Shot 2020-07-18 at 11.29.04.png

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nebulonN Offline
      nebulonN Offline
      nebulon
      Staff
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      You may want to check if you have hardlinks enabled. Then the "copying" is a very fast operation.

      MallewaxM 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      • nebulonN nebulon

        You may want to check if you have hardlinks enabled. Then the "copying" is a very fast operation.

        MallewaxM Offline
        MallewaxM Offline
        Mallewax
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @nebulon Ha...it was not enabled. Let me check the time for the next backup. Thanks a lot meanwhile.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • nebulonN nebulon

          You may want to check if you have hardlinks enabled. Then the "copying" is a very fast operation.

          MallewaxM Offline
          MallewaxM Offline
          Mallewax
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @nebulon That did the trick, thanks a lot again.

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Bookmarks
          • Search