Is this an alternative to mailpiler? cc @luckow @milian.hackradt

@d19dotca said in Sharing custom SpamAssassin Rules: I have also been tinkering with the spam rules again the past month, testing some things out. I’ll go into more detail with that soon with updated scores that I’m using. I wanted to do a bit more analysis of it today actually to make sure it’s in the right direction before sharing it, but I’ll likely be in a position to share it pretty soon. [image: giphy.gif]

I'm working on something that should be set in a couple of weeks from now. I've been much talking in this forum about some features that should be added to Cloudron to make it easier and functional for MSPs to use Cloudron to provide services for at least 5 years. I'd a lot of ideas to provide this service at scale, however there has been interest but in reality, very few moves to that route (this is not a complaint) I guess it's a matter of priority in development. So, I'd to refine my ideas to make the offer more of the conceptual type. I'll be using the Technology Courses teaching approach, in AI and Automation mainly, targetting "indie hackers" for a start, but projecting several more target markets, using the same approach. This is how I started to develop the idea at first, with the PaaS/SaaS approach. REVOLUCloud.com the form on the page is not yet active, but once one subscribes it gets redirected to REVOLU.Cloud where the idea of the service and all its possibilities is more developed. This is not necessarely dead per say, but like I said I'm using a new approach now. I cannot say much for the moment, but anyone having an interest with my new approach just hit me and I'll let you know more when ready.

@crazybrad Thank you for your input, yet I am interested in official apps with the same level of polish as other official apps.

If you're up for a challenge, look into the forum for sysbox which allows for stronger docker isolation so you can experiment with portainer in a more isolated container on Cloudron.

What are your thoughts on removing the app proxy limit as a vehicle to help market/promote Cloudron and get people into the ecosystem?

@markpousee have you already set the proxy server as a Trusted IP on cloudron - https://docs.cloudron.io/networking/#trusted-ips ? Though, I cannot think of why nginx is automatically restarting . TBH, I have never seen nginx crash. This makes me wonder if something in your setup (compose?) is monitoring nginx responses (some healtcheck?) and restarting nginx automatically ? If you have a test Cloudflare, you can quickly put Cloudflare in front of Cloudron and check if that works. After all, your proxy is same as Cloudflare functionally.

I think your use case is valid . But from Cloudron's POV, there is authentication and authorization. Cloudron OIDC does Authentication i.e verify the user is who he says he is. Authorization i.e whether the verified user has access to a resource is best done inside the app. This is why we also don't do Group setup in packages. For example, one can have some use case where each folder inside Surfer is available to different sets of users etc. I would say open up feature requests in the apps in question to implement that kind of access control.

That makes sense.

@marcusquinn ooops, well caught, sorry

@micmc Node apps run fine too, you just need to set the right ENV vars and adjust the startup script as well as the apache config to correctly route to the node app on port 3000 or whatever the code expects.

Oh, I just rebooted it again, and it seems to be all services / apps are running. Thanks

@humptydumpty yes, this is already fixed in 9.0. In addition, the update information is available as part of each app object as well (in the REST response).

Not a bad concept. Doesn't need dedicated hardware, might be able to run on the build/demo server or other sponsoring org. Integrate with CCAI upgraded to a distributed DB or some master/share topology to keep a running list of all custom packages successfully installed and make them available to everyone else.

To me it would be a selfhosted solution / load balancing peace of mind thing. That said I haven't really seen the server struggle to do anything for my less than 10 connections simultaneously. I'm not sure what the capacity for a single server would be, if I avoid apps that are CPU heavy, just use nextcloud for file sharing.

An error in the tutorial is the most likely explanation, I think. I will try and think back to what we were doing and see if we remember something else. Restarting from scratch might be the best idea, though you have probably tried that several times already. Maybe the browser has a cache of the page or something like that...