Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Cubby
  3. About links

About links

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Cubby
3 Posts 2 Posters 775 Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jeauJ Offline
    jeauJ Offline
    jeau
    App Dev
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I'm considering using Cubby as a remote shared images repository for an IIIF Cantaloupe server.

    I have a question about the links, what is the difference between the open link and share link? both provide public access to the file. The former offers access via the API but is it useful in the backend? It unnecessarily exposes an access token for all files. Am I wrong?

    There is a feature I would like to have: for each directory, download in csv format the list of files with for each file: name, uptated date, size and share link (and gift for my use case only the SID).

    I noticed that the blog https://blog.getcubby.org/ is down.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nebulonN nebulon marked this topic as a question on
    • nebulonN Offline
      nebulonN Offline
      nebulon
      Staff
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Indeed, the open link contains the access token. The intention here was to just be able to open a specific file in a new tab, not to share this link, but I can see how this is easily misused. For better handling, I think I would need to implement a local cookie based session, which is currently not done.

      So for your use-case, the share link seems to be the correct one.

      (thanks for the hint about the blog. It is up again)

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • nebulonN Offline
        nebulonN Offline
        nebulon
        Staff
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        This was fixed some versions ago by implementing session based auth

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • nebulonN nebulon has marked this topic as solved on
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Bookmarks
        • Search