Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Support
  3. tarExtract pipeline error: Invalid tar header

tarExtract pipeline error: Invalid tar header

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Support
restorenextcloudheadertar
24 Posts 6 Posters 1.4k Views 7 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nebulonN Away
    nebulonN Away
    nebulon
    Staff
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Do you get this error when restoring a newly made backup now without encryption? If so how large is the resulting tarball? I am not aware of any filesystem based problem with CIFS around such fundamental things as block sizes, but this is probably more related to the tar and not the filesystem unless for some reason the CIFS mount gets corrupt.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nottheendN Offline
      nottheendN Offline
      nottheend
      wrote on last edited by nottheend
      #14

      Yes, I got the error mentioned before on a newly created backup without encryption. The tarball was around 13 GB.

      I was only able to restore backups older than 1 month for the nextcloud app. For all other 12+ apps restoring did work like a charme for the most recent backup (younger than 1 month).

      It gives me the impression that the CIFS with Hetzner Storagebox is a risky choice.
      Therefore, a hint in the docs might be saving some lives of other folks.

      I would like to offer 2 additional feedbacks beyond the CIFS issue and the docs:

      1. it seems to be not possible to use the decryption command line cloudron command with a password that includes special characters. I tried to escape with " but it didn't work. Probably sth to document. Maybe there is a way to escape after all.
      2. Is there any way to do backup validation? It is probably concerning to see successful backups while they are corrupt.

      And thanks a lot for the support @girish and @nebulon for pointing me in the right direction! I resolved it by choosing a different cloud provider and different storage protocol. I used S3 now. Backing up and restoring worked with encryption completely fine!
      Thank you!

      girishG jdaviescoatesJ 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      • nottheendN nottheend

        Yes, I got the error mentioned before on a newly created backup without encryption. The tarball was around 13 GB.

        I was only able to restore backups older than 1 month for the nextcloud app. For all other 12+ apps restoring did work like a charme for the most recent backup (younger than 1 month).

        It gives me the impression that the CIFS with Hetzner Storagebox is a risky choice.
        Therefore, a hint in the docs might be saving some lives of other folks.

        I would like to offer 2 additional feedbacks beyond the CIFS issue and the docs:

        1. it seems to be not possible to use the decryption command line cloudron command with a password that includes special characters. I tried to escape with " but it didn't work. Probably sth to document. Maybe there is a way to escape after all.
        2. Is there any way to do backup validation? It is probably concerning to see successful backups while they are corrupt.

        And thanks a lot for the support @girish and @nebulon for pointing me in the right direction! I resolved it by choosing a different cloud provider and different storage protocol. I used S3 now. Backing up and restoring worked with encryption completely fine!
        Thank you!

        girishG Offline
        girishG Offline
        girish
        Staff
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        @nottheend said in tarExtract pipeline error: Invalid tar header:

        Is there any way to do backup validation? It is probably concerning to see successful backups while they are corrupt.

        This is in the immediate roadmap (https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/9975/what-s-coming-in-8-1 ). The "backup integrity". Ideally, we have to store information in the storage and also provide a mechanism to "validate" the integrity from the UI.

        1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • nottheendN nottheend

          Yes, I got the error mentioned before on a newly created backup without encryption. The tarball was around 13 GB.

          I was only able to restore backups older than 1 month for the nextcloud app. For all other 12+ apps restoring did work like a charme for the most recent backup (younger than 1 month).

          It gives me the impression that the CIFS with Hetzner Storagebox is a risky choice.
          Therefore, a hint in the docs might be saving some lives of other folks.

          I would like to offer 2 additional feedbacks beyond the CIFS issue and the docs:

          1. it seems to be not possible to use the decryption command line cloudron command with a password that includes special characters. I tried to escape with " but it didn't work. Probably sth to document. Maybe there is a way to escape after all.
          2. Is there any way to do backup validation? It is probably concerning to see successful backups while they are corrupt.

          And thanks a lot for the support @girish and @nebulon for pointing me in the right direction! I resolved it by choosing a different cloud provider and different storage protocol. I used S3 now. Backing up and restoring worked with encryption completely fine!
          Thank you!

          jdaviescoatesJ Offline
          jdaviescoatesJ Offline
          jdaviescoates
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          @nottheend said in tarExtract pipeline error: Invalid tar header:

          It gives me the impression that the CIFS with Hetzner Storagebox is a risky choice.

          I've been using it pretty much without issue for a good couple of years now, including doing a couple of complete restores.

          But: I don't use encryption. I've always taken the veiw that issues relating to having troubls decrypting - eg forgetting passphrase, some corruption etc etx - are a bigger risk for me losing data than someone somehow gaining access to my Storage Boxes, in part because I don't have particularly sensitive data stored.

          I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • potemkin_aiP Offline
            potemkin_aiP Offline
            potemkin_ai
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            Hetzner's box, SSHFS with encryption - recovery fails with:

            2024-10-19T13:37:34.456Z box:provision setProgress: restore - Downloading backup /mnt/cloudronbackup/my_domain_cloudron/2024-10-19-130519-879/box_v8.0.6.tar.gz.enc
            2024-10-19T13:37:34.456Z box:storage/filesystem download: /mnt/cloudronbackup/my_domain_cloudron/2024-10-19-130519-879/box_v8.0.6.tar.gz.enc
            2024-10-19T13:37:34.547Z box:backupformat/tgz Attempt 2 failed. Will retry: tarExtract pipeline error: incorrect header check
            

            Checking the file:

            file /mnt/cloudronbackup/my_domain_cloudron/2024-10-19-130519-879/box_v8.0.6.tar.gz.enc
            /mnt/cloudronbackup/my_domain_cloudron/2024-10-19-130519-879/box_v8.0.6.tar.gz.enc: data
            

            Guess encrypted data can't have tar headers?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • potemkin_aiP Offline
              potemkin_aiP Offline
              potemkin_ai
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              in my specific case - that was due to decryption key error

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • girishG girish has marked this topic as solved on
              • P Offline
                P Offline
                p44
                translator
                wrote on last edited by p44
                #19

                Hello everyone,

                restoring Wordpress Developer instance, I had this problem right now:

                May 09 13:54:41 box:backupformat/tgz tarExtract: ./data/public/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/filename.jpg 73444 file to /home/yellowtent/appsdata/xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx/data/public/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/filename.jpg
                May 09 13:54:41 box:apptask run: app error for state pending_restore: BoxError: tarExtract pipeline error: invalid stored block lengths at tarExtract (/home/yellowtent/box/src/backupformat/tgz.js:225:26) at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5) at async /home/yellowtent/box/src/backupformat/tgz.js:248:9 at async promiseRetry (/home/yellowtent/box/src/promise-retry.js:17:20) at async Object.download (/home/yellowtent/box/src/backupformat/tgz.js:244:5) at async download (/home/yellowtent/box/src/backuptask.js:104:5) at async Object.downloadApp (/home/yellowtent/box/src/backuptask.js:138:5) at async install (/home/yellowtent/box/src/apptask.js:368:9) { reason: 'External Error', details: {} }
                May 09 13:54:41 box:tasks setCompleted - 681: {"result":null,"error":{"stack":"BoxError: tarExtract pipeline error: invalid stored block lengths\n at tarExtract (/home/yellowtent/box/src/backupformat/tgz.js:225:26)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)\n at async /home/yellowtent/box/src/backupformat/tgz.js:248:9\n at async promiseRetry (/home/yellowtent/box/src/promise-retry.js:17:20)\n at async Object.download (/home/yellowtent/box/src/backupformat/tgz.js:244:5)\n at async download (/home/yellowtent/box/src/backuptask.js:104:5)\n at async Object.downloadApp (/home/yellowtent/box/src/backuptask.js:138:5)\n at async install (/home/yellowtent/box/src/apptask.js:368:9)","name":"BoxError","reason":"External Error","details":{},"message":"tarExtract pipeline error: invalid stored block lengths"}}
                May 09 13:54:41 box:tasks update 681: {"percent":100,"result":null,"error":{"stack":"BoxError: tarExtract pipeline error: invalid stored block lengths\n at tarExtract (/home/yellowtent/box/src/backupformat/tgz.js:225:26)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)\n at async /home/yellowtent/box/src/backupformat/tgz.js:248:9\n at async promiseRetry (/home/yellowtent/box/src/promise-retry.js:17:20)\n at async Object.download (/home/yellowtent/box/src/backupformat/tgz.js:244:5)\n at async download (/home/yellowtent/box/src/backuptask.js:104:5)\n at async Object.downloadApp (/home/yellowtent/box/src/backuptask.js:138:5)\n at async install (/home/yellowtent/box/src/apptask.js:368:9)","name":"BoxError","reason":"External Error","details":{},"message":"tarExtract pipeline error: invalid stored block lengths"}}
                May 09 13:54:41 box:taskworker Task took 335.441 seconds
                May 09 13:54:41 BoxError: tarExtract pipeline error: invalid stored block lengths
                

                Many others file was extracted... but then stopped with this error:

                BoxError: tarExtract pipeline error: invalid stored block lengths at tarExtract

                and

                External Error: tarExtract pipeline error: Invalid tar header. Maybe the tar is corrupted or it needs to be gunzipped?

                alt text

                Edit:

                I confirm that is something Hetzner Box related (Via CIFS).
                I changed to Backblaze and everything is fine.

                1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • nottheendN Offline
                  nottheendN Offline
                  nottheend
                  wrote on last edited by nottheend
                  #20

                  Hopefully it will not appear with any storage anymore when this is implemented:

                  (9.0) Backup integrity - store size and checksum of backups. Also provide a way to "verify" backup integrity in the remote.
                  

                  Mentioned in
                  what's coming in cloudron 9

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • P Offline
                    P Offline
                    p44
                    translator
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    @nottheend ok thanks a lot

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • P p44 referenced this topic on
                    • P Offline
                      P Offline
                      p44
                      translator
                      wrote last edited by
                      #22

                      Again, handling a "tarExtract pipeline error: incorrect header check" issue... on a different backup... very very sad for this... I hope you can release soon a solution because is risky to store backups that then cannot be restored @girish

                      girishG 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P p44

                        Again, handling a "tarExtract pipeline error: incorrect header check" issue... on a different backup... very very sad for this... I hope you can release soon a solution because is risky to store backups that then cannot be restored @girish

                        girishG Offline
                        girishG Offline
                        girish
                        Staff
                        wrote last edited by
                        #23

                        @p44 for encrypted backups, not sure what is the expected behaviour. If the backup is corrupt or password is forgotten, one cannot recover. What do you have in mind? What do you think Cloudron could have done? (or was your note about adding periodic integrity checks?)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P Offline
                          P Offline
                          p44
                          translator
                          wrote last edited by
                          #24

                          @girish

                          Periodic integrity checks – for example, verifying the backup archive and reporting issues proactively – could help discover corruption early, before a restore is needed. This would give admins a chance to re-run or fix backups in time.

                          What do you think about such a feature?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Bookmarks
                          • Search