Replacing Docker with Podman
-
https://phoenixnap.com/kb/podman-vs-dockerWith new licensing is it time to look at podman?
https://pakstech.com/blog/replace-docker-with-podman/ -
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Is there a tool that easily converts a Docker into a Podman?
How well would Podman work with reproducible builds?
https://reproducible-builds.org/What would the advantage/disadvantage be of having a monolithic platform?
I wonder how true it would be to say that a Docker is like a binary blob, and whether Podman would be less like that.
-
-
@LoudLemur Atleast, for the end user, replacing Docker with podman has no real benefit. I think another aspect is more people know Docker than Podman. This makes support much simpler for us. Same reason we chose Ubuntu, though other distros are suitable/progressive
Currently, Docker has much practical benefits and is actively maintained. Also, the container tools use the same abstractions underneath now - libcontainer, runc etc. -
Here is an AI (Grok) generated comparison:
Key Points
Research suggests Podman could replace Docker in Cloudron.io, offering enhanced security and simpler management, but adoption may vary due to familiarity with Docker. It seems likely that Podman's rootless containers and daemonless design could benefit Cloudron users, though official support is unclear. The evidence leans toward Podman providing better Linux integration and future-proofing, but Cloudron's current reliance on Docker may pose challenges.Introduction
Podman is an alternative to Docker for container management, and there’s growing interest in using it with platforms like Cloudron.io, which hosts web applications. While Cloudron traditionally uses Docker, Podman offers potential advantages that could enhance security and ease of use. However, the transition isn’t straightforward, and user familiarity with Docker might influence adoption. Below, we explore how Podman could fit into Cloudron and highlight key benefits, while acknowledging the complexities involved.
Advantages of Podman for Cloudron
Here are five main advantages of using Podman over Docker in Cloudron.io applications, based on general container management insights:Enhanced Security: Podman runs containers rootless by default, reducing the risk of privilege escalation, which is crucial for self-hosted platforms like Cloudron. Daemonless Architecture: Unlike Docker, Podman doesn’t require a background daemon, simplifying setup and reducing potential failure points, potentially making Cloudron easier to manage. Better Linux Integration: Podman has native support for SELinux and systemd, improving compatibility with Linux systems commonly used in Cloudron setups. Improved Isolation: Podman’s design ensures better isolation between containers and the host, enhancing system stability and security for Cloudron users. Future-Proofing: As Podman is actively developed by Red Hat, it may offer long-term support and compatibility with emerging technologies, benefiting Cloudron in the long run.Considerations
While these advantages are promising, it’s important to note that Cloudron’s documentation and community discussions, such as on the Cloudron forum (Replacing Docker with Podman), suggest that as of 2022, there was little perceived benefit for end users, with Docker being more widely known and supported. Recent developments might change this, but official Cloudron support for Podman isn’t explicitly confirmed in available resources.
Survey Note: Detailed Analysis of Podman as a Docker Replacement in Cloudron.io
This section provides a comprehensive exploration of using Podman as a replacement for Docker in Cloudron.io applications, expanding on the direct answer with detailed research and analysis. It aims to mimic a professional article, covering all aspects considered in the decision-making process, including historical context, technical comparisons, and community insights.
Background on Cloudron and Containerization
Cloudron is a self-hosted platform designed to simplify the installation, management, and security of web applications on servers, often leveraging cloud providers like AWS or DigitalOcean (Cloudron Docs). It traditionally relies on Docker for containerization, as evidenced by its packaging tutorials, which instruct users to create Dockerfiles and push images to registries (Tutorial - Cloudron Docs). This reliance on Docker is integral to its app deployment workflow, where applications are built and managed using Docker commands.
Podman, developed by Red Hat, is an open-source container engine that aims to provide a more secure and lightweight alternative to Docker (What is Podman?). It is daemonless, supports rootless containers, and aligns with OCI (Open Container Initiative) standards, making it compatible with Docker images. Given these features, there’s potential for Podman to serve as a replacement, especially as Docker’s licensing changes in recent years have prompted some users to explore alternatives (Podman vs Docker: Top Differences).
Research Methodology
To assess Podman’s suitability for Cloudron, we analyzed general comparisons between Podman and Docker, focusing on aspects relevant to Cloudron’s use case, such as security, management, and Linux integration. We also reviewed Cloudron-specific discussions, particularly from the Cloudron forum, to gauge community sentiment and official positions. Given the current date (April 19, 2025), we prioritized recent sources, though some foundational insights date back to 2022-2024, reflecting the evolution of container tools.
Detailed Advantages of Podman Over Docker
The following table summarizes the key advantages of Podman, derived from various sources, and their relevance to Cloudron:
AdvantageDescription
Relevance to Cloudron
Daemonless ArchitecturePodman does not require a daemon, reducing the risk of a single point of failure, unlike Docker.
Simplifies Cloudron setup, potentially reducing maintenance overhead for users.
Rootless ExecutionPodman runs containers as non-root users by default, enhancing security.
Critical for Cloudron’s security-focused platform, reducing attack surface for apps.
Enhanced SecurityOffers in-depth audit logging, better access control, and no interference with firewall rules.
Aligns with Cloudron’s emphasis on security best practices, enhancing user trust.
Native SELinux SupportProvides user-friendly SELinux implementation, compared to Docker’s module-based approach.
Improves compatibility with Linux distributions used in Cloudron, like Ubuntu.
Integration with systemdFully integrates with systemd, enabling systemd within containers out of the box.
Enhances reliability and management of services in Cloudron-hosted applications.
Pod Concept for KubernetesIntroduces pods, facilitating transitions to Kubernetes, unlike Docker’s Swarm focus.
Useful for Cloudron users scaling applications, though less directly relevant currently.
These advantages were identified from sources like Podman vs Docker: In-Depth Comparison and Exploring Podman: A More Secure Docker Alternative, which highlight Podman’s security and management benefits.
Community and Official Perspectives
Community discussions, particularly on the Cloudron forum (Replacing Docker with Podman), indicate mixed views. As of 2022, a forum post suggested that replacing Docker with Podman offered “no real benefit” for end users, citing Docker’s wider familiarity and active maintenance. This sentiment was echoed by the observation that “more people know Docker than Podman,” making support simpler for Cloudron’s team. However, given recent developments in container technology and Docker’s licensing changes, there may be renewed interest. Unfortunately, recent forum content couldn’t be accessed, limiting direct insight into 2025 perspectives.
Official Cloudron documentation, such as Installation - Cloudron Docs, does not mention Podman, reinforcing Docker’s current role. However, given Podman’s compatibility with Docker images, it’s theoretically possible to configure Cloudron to use Podman, though this would likely require custom setup and isn’t officially supported.
Technical Feasibility and Challenges
Podman’s compatibility with Docker images means Cloudron users could potentially build and push images using Podman instead of Docker, leveraging commands like podman build and podman push. This is supported by Podman’s documentation (podman-run — Podman documentation), which details how it handles container execution. However, Cloudron’s internal management tools, such as the CLI for installing apps, are designed around Docker, which could pose integration challenges. For instance, commands like cloudron install --image <image> assume Docker compatibility, and switching to Podman might require modifications to these workflows.
Additionally, Cloudron’s reliance on Docker-specific features, such as the overlay2 graph driver (Storage - Cloudron Docs), suggests potential compatibility issues. While Podman supports overlay2, ensuring seamless operation would need testing, especially for app backups and migrations, core features of Cloudron (Cloudron - Complete solution for self-hosting web apps).
Future Considerations
Looking ahead, Podman’s active development by Red Hat and its integration with tools like Buildah and Skopeo (What is Podman?) position it as a future-proof option. For Cloudron users, this could mean better long-term support and compatibility with emerging technologies, such as Kubernetes, where Podman’s pod concept is advantageous (Podman vs Docker: What Are the Key Differences Explained in Detail | GeeksforGeeks). However, the transition would require community and official buy-in, potentially through feature requests or community-driven plugins.
Conclusion
In summary, Podman offers compelling advantages over Docker, including enhanced security, daemonless operation, and better Linux integration, which could benefit Cloudron.io users. However, as of April 19, 2025, Cloudron’s official stance and community sentiment suggest a preference for Docker due to familiarity and support. While technically feasible, adopting Podman would likely require custom configurations and testing, with potential challenges in integration. Users interested in exploring Podman should monitor community discussions and consider contributing to the conversation on platforms like the Cloudron forum.
Key CitationsPodman vs Docker: Top Differences Podman vs Docker: In-Depth Comparison Exploring Podman: A More Secure Docker Alternative Replacing Docker with Podman Cloudron Docs Tutorial - Cloudron Docs What is Podman? Podman vs Docker: What Are the Key Differences Explained in Detail | GeeksforGeeks Installation - Cloudron Docs Storage - Cloudron Docs podman-run — Podman documentation Cloudron - Complete solution for self-hosting web apps -
AI-generated wall of texts everywhere, not complemented by personal experience / knowledge - what a time to be alive
-
I thought I would ask my favorite AI tool a more practical question (assuming Team Cloudron wanted to move to Podman): "How can Cloudron migrate from a Docker architecture to a Podman architecture"? The answer (https://www.perplexity.ai/search/cloudron-is-based-on-a-docker-EEoZGv7DRaKfZhG21OrgsA) is ugly, and in short order... not going to make sense. Unless Docker became unsustainable from a licensing or cost perspective in the future, the costs and risk are huge and the benefits unclear. And a gradual migration does not seem technically possible/advisable either.
