Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. App Wishlist
  3. AppFlowy

AppFlowy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved App Wishlist
44 Posts 21 Posters 9.4k Views 29 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dont-Worry
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Would be very good to have it in Cloudron. Vikunja is good but a little bit too simplistic for business needs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • GengarG Gengar

      I've just discovered AppFlowy and this app seems awesome ! Would love to see it in Cloudron. I'm a notion power user, and I can't wait to ditch notion.

      But as @jadudm said, seems like docker-compose based app are not easy to convert to a single dockerfile to work with Cloudron...

      robiR Offline
      robiR Offline
      robi
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      @Gengar said in AppFlowy:

      But as @jadudm said, seems like docker-compose based app are not easy to convert to a single dockerfile to work with Cloudron...

      This conclusion is not correct.

      Compose just means separate things being put together as one, and many devs don't know they don't need to do that with whatever docs the followed.

      Hence a single dockerfile is just that, all the services set up in the right sequence in one.

      This is what your computer does, right? Until you install a hypervisor or docker, etc to separate things out.

      So it's not any more difficult, it's just more than one service to define and setup in the Cloudron way.

      And we already have 3 digits of apps many of which need more than one service running for the App.

      Tons of examples in at git.cloudron.io

      Conscious tech

      GengarG 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • robiR robi

        @Gengar said in AppFlowy:

        But as @jadudm said, seems like docker-compose based app are not easy to convert to a single dockerfile to work with Cloudron...

        This conclusion is not correct.

        Compose just means separate things being put together as one, and many devs don't know they don't need to do that with whatever docs the followed.

        Hence a single dockerfile is just that, all the services set up in the right sequence in one.

        This is what your computer does, right? Until you install a hypervisor or docker, etc to separate things out.

        So it's not any more difficult, it's just more than one service to define and setup in the Cloudron way.

        And we already have 3 digits of apps many of which need more than one service running for the App.

        Tons of examples in at git.cloudron.io

        GengarG Offline
        GengarG Offline
        Gengar
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        @robi Thanks for your clarification, and you're absolutely right that a docker-compose setup can be translated into a single Dockerfile. I didn’t mean to suggest it's impossible or overly complex from a technical point of view. It just seems to me, based on what I’ve read on the forum and what @jadudm pointed out, that apps originally built with docker-compose tend to require more work to adapt to Cloudron. So they don’t always feel like the easiest starting point compared to more straightforward "quick win" Dockerfile-based apps.

        robiR 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • GengarG Gengar

          @robi Thanks for your clarification, and you're absolutely right that a docker-compose setup can be translated into a single Dockerfile. I didn’t mean to suggest it's impossible or overly complex from a technical point of view. It just seems to me, based on what I’ve read on the forum and what @jadudm pointed out, that apps originally built with docker-compose tend to require more work to adapt to Cloudron. So they don’t always feel like the easiest starting point compared to more straightforward "quick win" Dockerfile-based apps.

          robiR Offline
          robiR Offline
          robi
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          @Gengar No worries, we're on the same page.

          And no need to discourage anyone from trying.

          Conscious tech

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Bookmarks
          • Search