Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. NocoDB
  3. Cloudron Read-Only File System Breaking Backblaze B2 App

Cloudron Read-Only File System Breaking Backblaze B2 App

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NocoDB
4 Posts 3 Posters 645 Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • 3699n3 Offline
      3699n3 Offline
      3699n
      wrote on last edited by 3699n
      #1

      When trying to enable the Backblaze B2 app in NocoDB, a cloudron-specific error is occuring where the testing of the configuration fails due to the read-only file system of cloudron apps. This prevents the B2 app from functioning properly. I have confirmed with a NocoDB developer that this issue is Cloudron specific.
      erofs read only file system

      Nov 10 04:44:50 p :: [Error: EROFS: read-only file system, open '/app/code/temp.txt'] {
      Nov 10 04:44:50 errno: -30,
      Nov 10 04:44:50 code: 'EROFS',
      Nov 10 04:44:50 syscall: 'open',
      Nov 10 04:44:50 path: '/app/code/temp.txt'
      Nov 10 04:44:50 }
      Nov 10 04:44:50 POST /api/v1/db/meta/plugins/test 400 65 - 32.846 ms
      Nov 10 04:45:00 GET /dashboard 301 185 - 4.418 ms
      
      girishG 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • 3699n3 3699n

        When trying to enable the Backblaze B2 app in NocoDB, a cloudron-specific error is occuring where the testing of the configuration fails due to the read-only file system of cloudron apps. This prevents the B2 app from functioning properly. I have confirmed with a NocoDB developer that this issue is Cloudron specific.
        erofs read only file system

        Nov 10 04:44:50 p :: [Error: EROFS: read-only file system, open '/app/code/temp.txt'] {
        Nov 10 04:44:50 errno: -30,
        Nov 10 04:44:50 code: 'EROFS',
        Nov 10 04:44:50 syscall: 'open',
        Nov 10 04:44:50 path: '/app/code/temp.txt'
        Nov 10 04:44:50 }
        Nov 10 04:44:50 POST /api/v1/db/meta/plugins/test 400 65 - 32.846 ms
        Nov 10 04:45:00 GET /dashboard 301 185 - 4.418 ms
        
        girishG Offline
        girishG Offline
        girish
        Staff
        wrote on last edited by
        #2

        @3699n said in Cloudron Read-Only File System Breaking Backblaze B2 App:

        Nov 10 04:44:50 p :: [Error: EROFS: read-only file system, open '/app/code/temp.txt'] {

        The app is trying to write to the code directory. Do you know why? Why is it creating temp files in code directory and not under /tmp/ ?

        If you think about it, Cloudron is doing the right thing, it's why the read only setup exists. We don't want apps to modify/write the code and create security issues. If they create "data" inside code directories, then how is one supposed to create a proper backup or upgrade ?

        @3699n If you are in touch with the upstream author / have a github issue, I am happy to follow up.

        fbartelsF 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • girishG girish

          @3699n said in Cloudron Read-Only File System Breaking Backblaze B2 App:

          Nov 10 04:44:50 p :: [Error: EROFS: read-only file system, open '/app/code/temp.txt'] {

          The app is trying to write to the code directory. Do you know why? Why is it creating temp files in code directory and not under /tmp/ ?

          If you think about it, Cloudron is doing the right thing, it's why the read only setup exists. We don't want apps to modify/write the code and create security issues. If they create "data" inside code directories, then how is one supposed to create a proper backup or upgrade ?

          @3699n If you are in touch with the upstream author / have a github issue, I am happy to follow up.

          fbartelsF Offline
          fbartelsF Offline
          fbartels
          App Dev
          wrote on last edited by
          #3

          @girish this is the one it seems https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/issues/4213

          girishG 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • fbartelsF fbartels

            @girish this is the one it seems https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/issues/4213

            girishG Offline
            girishG Offline
            girish
            Staff
            wrote on last edited by
            #4

            @fbartels thanks, I have left a note there.

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Bookmarks
              • Search