Very small quality of life request for 8.2:
Please ensure these tool tip / help / further reading links open in a new tab or window rather than linking directly to the resource which causes the user to lose any data they've entered into the form/process.
Hi team,
As a brand new user to this forum, I only have permissions to post and reply to the Comentario and Azuracast categories. A post I just made was moved from Comentario to the correct forum (per my request - OpenProject) and I am now unable to reply to it.
@Joseph any ideas on what is wrong with the settings for new users? If you move this topic I will have to create a new one in order to reply so please keep this in Comentario until we're finished troubleshooting and the issue is resolved.
Nice, my eyes send you their appreciation.
There is a post queue system to prevent initial posts from spammers (ask me how I know - my first post went there). Upvotes would help but only if a user can get their post seen in the first place. That makes the Comentario and Azuracast sub-forums a super weird "pre-screening" choice for customers who have just joined the Cloudron community.
Upvoting (the main post) and commenting for engagement, even though it looks like voting for things here doesn't really seem to make a difference.
Confirming that there is a huge issue with n8n and I would encourage you all to check the status of your instances and resources as the failures are relatively silent if you do not have any type of error notifications built into your workflows. @girish
Update: This has been fixed by the n8n team, and Cloudron release 3.97.0 uses the updated image. Things seem ok so far. I recommend turning automatic updates off for n8n as they seem to be moving fast and breaking things.
====
Has anyone else noticed that all releases of n8n on Cloudron after 3.93.1 are pinging resources and seeing frequent timeouts? One of the updates stopped you from being able to login at all because the port was mapped incorrectly.
Any n8n users here that use the Outlook or Microsoft nodes notice an increase in failed executions or timeouts?
I'm not sure if it is the Cloudron build but these timeouts are hurting a lot of processes and web hooks.
Is there a way to downgrade without restoring a backup?
No worries. I'd be screwed if it weren't for Cloudron's solid backup/update management. I've turned off Automatic Updates for n8n as a result of this - I recommend other Cloudron users do the same.
@firmansi latest version was pushed to Cloudron
@girish Yep, exactly that. AnyType and Appflowy are growing in popularity. Would be nice to see them 
Out of curiosity what constitutes an app being selected or not? 27 upvotes (at time of writing), a lot of engagement and views, clearly a very good fit for the Cloudron platform (which already has Baserow, Nocodb, Directus etc).. When a platform already has Docker support does that make it more or less difficult to get it onto Cloudron? I would assume it is easier?
@Joseph yep, I've managed to resend the verification email by "changing" my email to the same email address and it appears I now have access and correct permissions. That means for unverified users, they still have access to your two most recent forum additions Comentario and Azuracast. Thanks for your help!
Another +1 for Flowise. Would really like to see this added since it is more of an orchestrator that supports local or remote APIs.
lol here I am thinking this is the EVE Online mapping tool, also called Wanderer. https://wanderer.ltd/welcome
Hi team,
I've noticed that Cloudron keeps pulling pre-release versions of n8n?
Is there a setting somewhere to stop this and only pull latest versions?
@Joseph this is why I posted in support.
That's interesting. When I initially couldn't post I did go to my settings to see if my account wasn't verified but there was nothing to say it wasn't. I just tried to click the link in my email (it was sitting alongside several other Cloudron emails) but it has timed out / expired (says it is invalid). I'm not sure how I resend it to get verified?
@imc67 said in Per-application access rules:
@umnz said in Per-application access rules:
@imc67 I'm not sure what you mean, Cloudron does have a Trusted / Blacklisted IPs and Fail2Ban support.
You are answering your own question: look at the subject of this future request and then the docs. What you mentioned is on server level .... not app level
Oops, my bad! Take my +1 instead lol.
