Foundry Virtual Tabletop
-
@TheMeerkat I'd like to see this, but can the server itself be hosted for free or does it also require a license?
@murgero said in Foundry Virtual Tabletop:
@TheMeerkat I'd like to see this, but can the server itself be hosted for free or does it also require a license?
I don't like the idea of including or increasing the number of non-Free applications which Cloudron supports. If any applications are non-Free, I think there ought to be a flag.
-
@murgero said in Foundry Virtual Tabletop:
@TheMeerkat I'd like to see this, but can the server itself be hosted for free or does it also require a license?
I don't like the idea of including or increasing the number of non-Free applications which Cloudron supports. If any applications are non-Free, I think there ought to be a flag.
@LoudLemur I'm not sure I agree.
Cloudron isn't free software itself, and many of us are using this to support business applications. I already pay for two cloudron premium licenses, and this would allow me not to need to use non-Cloudron based VMs to host this software. The level of community interest, not price, should dictate whether or not time and effort is put into creating a community image for the server software.
I suppose if needed I could use the Cloudron Build Service application to roll my own Foundry server docker image for the platform, but why not make it available to everyone if there is interest?
I do think there should be a flag in the app store that indicates whether or not the software requires a paid license or not. That way people will know if there is an additional cost to running the server in addition to what they are already paying for Cloudron.
-
@LoudLemur I'm not sure I agree.
Cloudron isn't free software itself, and many of us are using this to support business applications. I already pay for two cloudron premium licenses, and this would allow me not to need to use non-Cloudron based VMs to host this software. The level of community interest, not price, should dictate whether or not time and effort is put into creating a community image for the server software.
I suppose if needed I could use the Cloudron Build Service application to roll my own Foundry server docker image for the platform, but why not make it available to everyone if there is interest?
I do think there should be a flag in the app store that indicates whether or not the software requires a paid license or not. That way people will know if there is an additional cost to running the server in addition to what they are already paying for Cloudron.
@cilleyperson We already have apps that need licenses like confluence, teamspeak, onlyoffice enterprise etc. It's fine to have non-free apps.
-
@cilleyperson We already have apps that need licenses like confluence, teamspeak, onlyoffice enterprise etc. It's fine to have non-free apps.
This is a super neat software. I got a license for it too. Much cheaper than recurring roll20 subscriptions.
-
This is a super neat software. I got a license for it too. Much cheaper than recurring roll20 subscriptions.
this peeked my interest since I am also a DSA player. -
It was very.... very..... very simple to package this.
https://github.com/BrutalBirdie/cloudron-foundryvtt
Also I have already tested a major upgrade.
In the git tags:- https://github.com/BrutalBirdie/cloudron-foundryvtt/releases/tag/10.291
- https://github.com/BrutalBirdie/cloudron-foundryvtt/releases/tag/11.300
Upgraded with no problems.
Like my work? Consider donating a drink. Cheers!
-
It was very.... very..... very simple to package this.
https://github.com/BrutalBirdie/cloudron-foundryvtt
Also I have already tested a major upgrade.
In the git tags:- https://github.com/BrutalBirdie/cloudron-foundryvtt/releases/tag/10.291
- https://github.com/BrutalBirdie/cloudron-foundryvtt/releases/tag/11.300
Upgraded with no problems.
@BrutalBirdie said in Foundry Virtual Tabletop:
It was very.... very..... very simple to package this.
Maybe this packaging could be re-attempted using an AI. We might be able to improve the AI training with it....
-
@BrutalBirdie said in Foundry Virtual Tabletop:
It was very.... very..... very simple to package this.
Maybe this packaging could be re-attempted using an AI. We might be able to improve the AI training with it....
@LoudLemur
Oof -
@LoudLemur
Oof@BrutalBirdie said in Foundry Virtual Tabletop:
@LoudLemur
OofI just mean that, if this is about as simple as packaging can be for Cloudron, perhaps the AI might be able to do it. If it could do this one, it might be able to do another one. We might be able to learn which applications look packageable by AI.
Thanks for packaging it!
-
It was very.... very..... very simple to package this.
https://github.com/BrutalBirdie/cloudron-foundryvtt
Also I have already tested a major upgrade.
In the git tags:- https://github.com/BrutalBirdie/cloudron-foundryvtt/releases/tag/10.291
- https://github.com/BrutalBirdie/cloudron-foundryvtt/releases/tag/11.300
Upgraded with no problems.
@BrutalBirdie interesting. Do you think this is worth publishing in the App Store? I can't quite make out if this is generally useful or not.
-
@BrutalBirdie interesting. Do you think this is worth publishing in the App Store? I can't quite make out if this is generally useful or not.
@girish
It would make sense in the app-store since I know people who want to use this but have no idea of hosting.
This would make it very easy for them or a service provider like me - I already host multiple of these for friends.
In the app-store also makes sense since people who want to use the app now need premium.
Since without premium you can't install custom apps.This might be something that we should think about, already had multiple people denying cloudron a go since they could not test if they could run their own packaged stuff without paying up front - more private nerds then companies, for companies I am like bruh just pay for a month evaluation.
Where was I? Ah yes in the app-store, that would be nice
-
@BrutalBirdie said in Foundry Virtual Tabletop:
@LoudLemur
OofI just mean that, if this is about as simple as packaging can be for Cloudron, perhaps the AI might be able to do it. If it could do this one, it might be able to do another one. We might be able to learn which applications look packageable by AI.
Thanks for packaging it!
@LoudLemur Oh no! I did not take it a bad way or anything
not at all.The Oof was more like, yea AI could have done that.
Times we live in, aight! -
Updated to 11.306: https://github.com/BrutalBirdie/cloudron-foundryvtt/releases/tag/11.306
-
Updated to 11.306: https://github.com/BrutalBirdie/cloudron-foundryvtt/releases/tag/11.306
@BrutalBirdie Thanks so much for packaging Foundry!
-
@BrutalBirdie Thanks so much for packaging Foundry!
@TheMeerkat No problem
-
This post is deleted!
-
@RazielKanos The packaging I done does not comply with the Cloudron Team standards for packaging apps for the appstore.
There are life cycle tests missing to automate the whole release process.Also since VTT requires a license to even download the latest version (or any version) this package needs to be maintained by someone with a license.
Also the possible life cycle tests are near endless with this software since it is extendable by thousands of plugins.
So there is work that needs to be done.
I could do that, but right now I have no time.
