Code Server (Vs code online)

[murgero]

@ajtatum My repo above is able to be installed - I still haven't updated it tho.

[ajtatum]

@murgero I appreciate it, but I'd prefer an updated version and it be officially supported/maintained by Cloudron.

[murgero]

@ajtatum eventually when I get around to updating it and adding the automated tests I plan to submit it to cloudron but life has been getting in the way

[c0decafe]

put one together https://github.com/c0decafe/cloudron-codeserver

[girish]

@c0decafe this looks awesome If you can throw in a LICENSE , I can move it over to our gitlab for publishing.

[murgero]

I have a working package ready to go on the gitlab linked in the OP above somewhere. @c0decafe what does yours do differently than mine? Though I do like your repo certainly looks cleaner than mine lol

[girish]

@murgero oh, i missed yours. It seems is extended over LAMP app but @c0decafe is better because it's from scratch and only has the necessary things. Also, it seems your repo installs things like .net which @c0decafe does not. Not sure if those are needed or not.

[doodlemania2]

Would be good to have .net I think so one can work with the language, no? Or is that superfluous??

[murgero]

@girish Yea I like @c0decafe's as it's definitely cleaner.

Mine installs some basic developer environments like powershell, .net, node, etc so actual code can be compiled and tested in-app. IDK if it should be included with @c0decafe's, but I think it is a QOL thing.

Edit: Now I remember why I built it over the LAMP app - so PHP apps can be developed in full (including MySQL). Could be cleaned up and tbh I haven't maintained it so it's probably better to use @c0decafe's anyway.

So his repo gets an upvote from me!

[girish]

It seems a license file appeared upstream, so I will add this to our internal list.

[c0decafe]

Yes, I updated the package with (un)license, impermanent home dir and a few other tweaks.

As for language support, I can't think of any clean implementation within the current scope.

As a matter of fact, my primary use case for this package is, counterintuitively, not development, but rather a power editor with extensions, ie: markdown editor with git integration, dendron, etc..

The only way to make it scale for actual software dev within the scope of a cloudron app would be leveraging (abusing?) the docker addon.

The best candidate is coder, from the same team that maintains code-server: https://github.com/coder/coder

You can find a poc at https://github.com/c0decafe/cloudron-coder, but actually starting containers doesn't work yet.

Upstream VSCode also has a nifty devcontainers extension to do just that:

• https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/devcontainers/containers
• https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ms-vscode-remote.remote-containers

It is however unfortunately not supported on web platforms right now:

Another alternative currently available on cloudron is the GitLab webide, but:

1. No extensions support (yet)
   https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/355092
2. No run/debug support (yet)
3. Requires manually installed remote runtimes
   https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/remote_development/

[girish]

@c0decafe I don't know vscode that well enough. But does it allow connecting an external server to launch docker containers ? (instead of using the docker addon). If so, that's the ideal setup imo. Trying to use cloudron's internal docker network to launch app dev containters will bomb spectacularly at some point

[c0decafe]

@girish I dropped the idea of using docker for the code-server package, latest push removed the docker dependencies.

I'll add README when I get the chance.

Remote docker should work for coder however, also supports all major public clouds, but that's for another thread I suppose.

[timconsidine]

@girish are you planning to add @c0decafe package to App Store ?

Personally I don’t see much advantage of having an online dev environment without some dev languages, as @murgero does. But interested to try.

@murgero is your repo available ?

[girish]

I wasn't sure what the current state is. Did you try it out alraedy @timconsidine ? @c0decafe can you tell us the state?

[timconsidine]

@girish not tried it yet because it appears to not support added languages like nodejs.
I'm testing a self-built package based on openvscode-server with added nodejs and Flutter.
If I get it working with authentication, I will look at packaging for Cloudron.
But interested in any updates @c0decafe can give us.

[timconsidine]

Got custom openvscode-server with added node and flutter as a native Docker deployment. Not so difficult.
Hard part is to work out how to package it for Cloudron. <scratches head>

[robi]

@timconsidine it's only flutter and the app code that's missing from the base image, no?

[timconsidine]

While researching, I tried the linuxserver docker for openvscode-server and it didn’t have nodejs.
But yes node is in Cloudron base so may not have to add it.

[timconsidine]

So I built @c0decafe package for codeserver.

1st observations :

• slick (simple in a good way) Dockerfile
• flawless build and deploy
• supports php, node, python3 'out of the box' as part of Cloudron base image
• not sure if some dev tasks might need user cloudron to be part of sudo (but maybe not)
• read-only /app/code etc makes installing Flutter bit more complex : still working on it
• theme gets set nicely on first run, but lost on reinstall
• supports adding VS Code extensions : maybe not all but added one flawlessly
• no support for DinD or DooD : understand the reasons & limitations

Generally very nice package.
I would recommend being available on App Store as a good dev / editor environment.
In current scope, fairly easy to maintain for upgrades.
Definitely addresses a number of dev use cases (if not all, but that's complex in itself)

Adding additional dev languages might be needed for some use cases, but that adds significantly to image size.
And maybe raises issues of maintainability of version upgrades, core package and dev addons.
So not sure how this functionality can be implemented or maintained.

Depending on use case, Docker support might be an issue.
I have a custom version of openvscode-server running in Docker on another VPS, and I have been able to get DooD support by adding a volume label -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock`.

Sidenote on Flutter : getting Flutter installed and available may not be too difficult.
But for a good dev environment, Flutter needs stuff like AndroidStudio, some Chrome engine and Xcode for iOS dev.
In a hosted dev environment, this is difficult/impossible.
So one probably needs a local build/compile/test environment.
But then why not do everything locally ?

Despite the limitations on scope, I do think Codeserver on Cloudron would be a good addition.
Other PaaS have similar, so it might be a case of keeping some feature-equivalence with them.