Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. MiroTalk
  3. Producer Transport failed

Producer Transport failed

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved MiroTalk
17 Posts 8 Posters 3.3k Views 8 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic was forked from Error installing Miro SFU nebulon
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MiroTalkM Offline
    MiroTalkM Offline
    MiroTalk
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Should be fixed in MiroTalk SFU v.1.5.72. Cheers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • nebulonN Offline
      nebulonN Offline
      nebulon
      Staff
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Oh very nice! We've pushed a package update for 1.5.72 now

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        SebGG
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Hi, with MiroTalk SFU v.1.5.75 i still see this

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • MiroTalkM Offline
          MiroTalkM Offline
          MiroTalk
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          Hi everyone,

          Are we still encountering the same popup message as before, or is this a new one (see attached image)?

          mirotalk-sfu-transport-disconnect.png

          If it’s this new one, did you notice any further issues after the popup appeared?

          If it’s not, has anyone been able to consistently reproduce the original issue? If so, could you please share the exact steps to replicate it?

          Thanks!

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            SebGG
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            this is what i get

            grafik.png

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              SebGG
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Ports 40000 UDP and TCP are open
              the server is in my home network so i have direct connetion to it

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • nebulonN Offline
                nebulonN Offline
                nebulon
                Staff
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                ah so have you only opened port 40000 or all ports from 40000 to 40100 ? all of them are required as ports within that range are randomly chosen.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  SebGG
                  wrote on last edited by SebGG
                  #14

                  oh yeah, this was the problem, i just saw the 40000 in the install wizzard

                  01f4459f-b30b-40df-a28d-26635682a0ef-grafik.png

                  under the equestion sign its documented

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • nebulonN Offline
                    nebulonN Offline
                    nebulon
                    Staff
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    Right this is totally not obvious, we have to improve that UI...

                    jdaviescoatesJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • nebulonN nebulon

                      Right this is totally not obvious, we have to improve that UI...

                      jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                      jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                      jdaviescoates
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      @nebulon what value should be there? a range like 40000-40100? or?

                      I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • nebulonN Offline
                        nebulonN Offline
                        nebulon
                        Staff
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        The input field value is correct. However it is only indicating the starting point of the port range here: 40000 -> 40100

                        We have added that feature specifically for the SFU use-case so the UI was kept unchanged to not confuse every other app, where its only about 1 port.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Bookmarks
                        • Search