Bitwarden - Self-hosted password manager

[necrevistonnezr]

@iamthefij but import / export does not work for attachments, right? Or are these somehow migrateable?

[iamthefij]

@necrevistonnezr hmm. I've got no clue. I don't have any attachments and only use Bitwarden to manage passwords.

[lukaszj]

@iamthefij I've used your build with fixed emails and ldap and it installed well however I'm not sure how to get in.

Bitwarden asks for email so I supply email corresponding to my Cloudron login and Cloudron's password but it says username or password is invalid. Can you suggest something?

[iamthefij]

@lukaszj you should receive an invite email within a few min of the sync task running. I think it runs every 5 min. You'll need to click the link in that email to create your account.

[jimcavoli]

With all the activity on this thread, is it likely that Bitwarden will see release in the App Store any time soon? Even as an "unstable" package for easier trial by others?

[girish]

@jimcavoli We will take this up next week since we are working on getting 4.2 out this week. Will follow up with @iamthefij on what the status is.

[iamthefij]

@girish it should be good to go. My branch is working with MySQL and LDAP.

I've got two working Dockerfiles. One that compiles the entire project and another that just pulls the binary from the published images on Docker Hub. End result is the same.

[lukaszj]

Hello @girish is there any progress with releasing Bitwarden to App Store? Thanks!

[girish]

Unfortunately, not this week. The 4.2 release hit some hiccups. Good news is that we are rolling out 4.2 as we speak. So, we should get to this next week.

[lukaszj]

@girish Great, can't wait. Fingers crossed!

[iamthefij]

@girish great to hear! Let me know if there is anything I can do to help.

[necrevistonnezr]

Again, there's trouble with cloudron cli. I tried to login but it gives me the following errors:

cloudron login --allow-selfsigned
Cloudron Admin Domain: my.domain.com
ERROR (node:51749) Warning: Setting the NODE_TLS_REJECT_UNAUTHORIZED environment variable to '0' makes TLS connections and HTTPS requests insecure by disabling certificate verification. [ internal/process/warning.js:27:3 ]
ERROR Cloudron my.domain.com not found.
Try providing the admin location, probably my.my.domain.com [ /Users/user/.nvm/versions/node/v12.7.0/lib/node_modules/cloudron/src/helper.js:71:29 ]

What am I doing wrong?

[girish]

@necrevistonnezr You almost never have to use --allow-selfsigned Does my.domain.com have the correct cert?

[necrevistonnezr]

@girish Yes, the situation is the same with or without "--allow-selfsigned"
BTW I'm on macOS 10.15

[girish]

@necrevistonnezr Can you try using the CLI on the demo cloudron? Like:

cloudron login my.demo.cloudron.io

username and password is cloudron. you can then build and install there. does that entire flow work?

[necrevistonnezr]

@girish that gives me the same error but pinging works

bitwardenrs-app on master [!?] via ⬢ v12.7.0
➜ cloudron login my.cloudron.io
ERROR (node:55034) Warning: Setting the NODE_TLS_REJECT_UNAUTHORIZED environment variable to '0' makes TLS connections and HTTPS requests insecure by disabling certificate verification. [ internal/process/warning.js:27:3 ]
ERROR Cloudron my.cloudron.io not found.
Try providing the admin location, probably my.my.cloudron.io [ /Users/kdj/.nvm/versions/node/v12.7.0/lib/node_modules/cloudron/src/helper.js:71:29 ]
bitwardenrs-app on master [!?] via ⬢ v12.7.0 took 18s
➜ ping my.cloudron.io
PING my.cloudron.io (45.55.2.141): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 45.55.2.141: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=188.063 ms
64 bytes from 45.55.2.141: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=181.041 ms
64 bytes from 45.55.2.141: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=237.531 ms

[lukaszj]

Hi @girish is there any update re pushing official Bitwarden to Marketplace? Thanks.

[girish]

@lukaszj No ETA but it's on our immediate list. Currently, we are pushing out the release that makes it possible to build custom apps without our build service.

[lukaszj]

@girish Thanks.

[murgero]

@girish But building apps without the build service is already possible - do you mean that the manifest will allow us to specify a repo and docker image to install? Cause that would be nice!