Persist backup app doesn't work
-
@jdaviescoates said in Persist backup app doesn't work:
the most recent
Thanks!!
maybe easier to select the oldest then you don't have to wait for the retention period to pass
wrote on Jan 18, 2024, 12:13 PM last edited by jdaviescoates Jan 18, 2024, 12:16 PM@imc67 said in Persist backup app doesn't work:
maybe easier to select the oldest then you don't have to wait for the retention period to pass
I'll do that now...
Edit: I went for the oldest backup of the current package version (last copy of previous packages versions persisting due to rules about that).
-
@girish said in Persist backup app doesn't work:
@imc67 yes, please. I can't reproduce this. My backups are still persisting.
just sent you an email to support@
-
@imc67 said in Persist backup app doesn't work:
maybe easier to select the oldest then you don't have to wait for the retention period to pass
I'll do that now...
Edit: I went for the oldest backup of the current package version (last copy of previous packages versions persisting due to rules about that).
wrote on Jan 19, 2024, 1:02 PM last edited by jdaviescoates Jan 19, 2024, 1:05 PM@jdaviescoates said in Persist backup app doesn't work:
@imc67 said in Persist backup app doesn't work:
maybe easier to select the oldest then you don't have to wait for the retention period to pass
I'll do that now...
Edit: I went for the oldest backup of the current package version (last copy of previous packages versions persisting due to rules about that).
I realise now I should've done screenshot, but I can confirm that all of those "oldest backup of the current package version" that I had edited to persist have now disappeared and have not persisted at all!
Something is clearly very wrong somewhere.
I've just edited another "oldest backup of the current package version". Presumably it'll also disappear...
-
@jdaviescoates said in Persist backup app doesn't work:
@imc67 said in Persist backup app doesn't work:
maybe easier to select the oldest then you don't have to wait for the retention period to pass
I'll do that now...
Edit: I went for the oldest backup of the current package version (last copy of previous packages versions persisting due to rules about that).
I realise now I should've done screenshot, but I can confirm that all of those "oldest backup of the current package version" that I had edited to persist have now disappeared and have not persisted at all!
Something is clearly very wrong somewhere.
I've just edited another "oldest backup of the current package version". Presumably it'll also disappear...
wrote on Jan 20, 2024, 5:09 PM last edited by@jdaviescoates said in Persist backup app doesn't work:
I've just edited another "oldest backup of the current package version". Presumably it'll also disappear...
Yep, as predicted, it did disappear:
-
wrote on Jan 20, 2024, 5:10 PM last edited by
@girish said in Persist backup app doesn't work:
I can't reproduce this.
Are you trying with WordPress (Developer), as I was very easily able to reproduce it with that (not tried anything else... yet).
-
wrote on Jan 20, 2024, 5:16 PM last edited by
-
I'm testing with Calibre now (just to try another random app that isn't WordPress Developer):
wrote on Jan 22, 2024, 10:53 AM last edited by@jdaviescoates said in Persist backup app doesn't work:
I'm testing with Calibre now (just to try another random app that isn't WordPress Developer):
Yep, that's disappeared too:
-
Thanks @imc67 and @jdaviescoates for helping narrow this down. Indeed, this is a bug when using the fs backend, this is why I couldn't reproduce it. Fix is in https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/commit/243a254f3e2fe80d62d248e76f1a751b7af44b72
-
-
Thanks @imc67 and @jdaviescoates for helping narrow this down. Indeed, this is a bug when using the fs backend, this is why I couldn't reproduce it. Fix is in https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/commit/243a254f3e2fe80d62d248e76f1a751b7af44b72
wrote on Jan 25, 2024, 11:36 AM last edited by@girish great, thanks. Which version of Cloudron will this fix be included in?
-
Thanks @imc67 and @jdaviescoates for helping narrow this down. Indeed, this is a bug when using the fs backend, this is why I couldn't reproduce it. Fix is in https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/commit/243a254f3e2fe80d62d248e76f1a751b7af44b72
@girish thanks for the fix!
-
Should be in next release (8.0), but otherwise you have to apply that one liner manually.