Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Announcements
  3. What's coming in 5.2

What's coming in 5.2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
39 Posts 14 Posters 6.7k Views 15 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • girishG Offline
    girishG Offline
    girish
    Staff
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @echokos Currently, there is no way for an app to access data on the host/server. For example, let's say you have lots of photos or videos in an external drive or accessible via NFS, there is no way for the app to access it because of the containerization. Volumes will provide a way to mount host paths into containers. If we implement volume sharing, one use case is you can download a file via torrent and have the media immediately viewable via emby.

    yusfY E 2 Replies Last reply
    2
    • girishG girish

      @echokos Currently, there is no way for an app to access data on the host/server. For example, let's say you have lots of photos or videos in an external drive or accessible via NFS, there is no way for the app to access it because of the containerization. Volumes will provide a way to mount host paths into containers. If we implement volume sharing, one use case is you can download a file via torrent and have the media immediately viewable via emby.

      yusfY Offline
      yusfY Offline
      yusf
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      @girish The symlink approach is always available though?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • girishG Offline
        girishG Offline
        girish
        Staff
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        @yusf I guess you mean creating a symlinking straight in the appsdata directory? That won't work because the container can see what the symlink resolves to but cannot access the resolved path itself since it can only see within it's own file system.

        yusfY 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • girishG girish

          @yusf I guess you mean creating a symlinking straight in the appsdata directory? That won't work because the container can see what the symlink resolves to but cannot access the resolved path itself since it can only see within it's own file system.

          yusfY Offline
          yusfY Offline
          yusf
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          @girish Right. That wouldn’t be very isolated if it did work.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • girishG girish

            @echokos Currently, there is no way for an app to access data on the host/server. For example, let's say you have lots of photos or videos in an external drive or accessible via NFS, there is no way for the app to access it because of the containerization. Volumes will provide a way to mount host paths into containers. If we implement volume sharing, one use case is you can download a file via torrent and have the media immediately viewable via emby.

            E Offline
            E Offline
            echokos
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            @girish Ah, got it. Thanks that will be useful as well.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • marioM Offline
              marioM Offline
              mario
              App Dev
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              Like I've mentioned via email, I'd really appreciate email aliases - I have a couple of domains where I receive an email, so - mario@{domain1.com,domain2.com,domain3.com,..} is essential for my workflow.

              N girishG 2 Replies Last reply
              4
              • marioM mario

                Like I've mentioned via email, I'd really appreciate email aliases - I have a couple of domains where I receive an email, so - mario@{domain1.com,domain2.com,domain3.com,..} is essential for my workflow.

                N Offline
                N Offline
                NCKNE
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                @mario said in What's coming in 5.2:

                Like I've mentioned via email, I'd really appreciate email aliases - I have a couple of domains where I receive an email, so - mario@{domain1.com,domain2.com,domain3.com,..} is essential for my workflow

                Same here, this would be great and hopefully not too hard to implement. But there are most likely higher priorities in future development work to get done first.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • doodlemania2D Offline
                  doodlemania2D Offline
                  doodlemania2
                  App Dev
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  Would it be possible to get a measurement of bandwidth used per month per container (in and out)?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • marioM mario

                    Like I've mentioned via email, I'd really appreciate email aliases - I have a couple of domains where I receive an email, so - mario@{domain1.com,domain2.com,domain3.com,..} is essential for my workflow.

                    girishG Offline
                    girishG Offline
                    girish
                    Staff
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    @mario @NCKNE so a single mailbox with aliases? Essentially just like the current alias but across domains.

                    N marioM 2 Replies Last reply
                    3
                    • girishG girish

                      @mario @NCKNE so a single mailbox with aliases? Essentially just like the current alias but across domains.

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      NCKNE
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      @girish said in What's coming in 5.2:

                      @mario @NCKNE so a single mailbox with aliases? Essentially just like the current alias but across domains.

                      Yes, I believe that is a common scenario for business implementations.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • girishG girish

                        @mario @NCKNE so a single mailbox with aliases? Essentially just like the current alias but across domains.

                        marioM Offline
                        marioM Offline
                        mario
                        App Dev
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        @girish said in What's coming in 5.2:

                        @mario @NCKNE so a single mailbox with aliases? Essentially just like the current alias but across domains.

                        That's indeed it, and @NCKNE is right - it's a business requirement.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • doodlemania2D Offline
                          doodlemania2D Offline
                          doodlemania2
                          App Dev
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          On notifications, when Redis runs out of memory, we get just a GUID - that takes time to track down which app that is to increase memory. Any way to tie that back to the deployed app name or URL?

                          girishG 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • doodlemania2D doodlemania2

                            On notifications, when Redis runs out of memory, we get just a GUID - that takes time to track down which app that is to increase memory. Any way to tie that back to the deployed app name or URL?

                            girishG Offline
                            girishG Offline
                            girish
                            Staff
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            @doodlemania2 Yes, redis changes are coming in https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/issues/671

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              msbt
                              App Dev
                              wrote on last edited by msbt
                              #19

                              Because I just gave a user the "User Manager" role (I thought this would enable a user to manage the users of a certain group): It would be awesome to lock that user-manager to a specific domain/group, so all other users won't be visible to that person.

                              Same goes for admin vs. group-admin (admin = global, group admin can only install/manage apps, email and users on the (primary-) groups he's added. This way you can let people manage their own users without interfering with other groups. Does that explanation make sense?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              4
                              • girishG Offline
                                girishG Offline
                                girish
                                Staff
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                @msbt Yes, I think so. A couple of people have requested a sort of "group manager"/"group admin" role. We can look into it for the next release. We are hoping to get 5.2 out next week or so.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                5
                                • jimcavoliJ Offline
                                  jimcavoliJ Offline
                                  jimcavoli
                                  App Dev
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  Another +1 for group managers (I've mentioned this before of course 🙂 ). This would relieve a lot of my reservation on granting user manager to certain folks in some organizations!

                                  yusfY 1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • jimcavoliJ jimcavoli

                                    Another +1 for group managers (I've mentioned this before of course 🙂 ). This would relieve a lot of my reservation on granting user manager to certain folks in some organizations!

                                    yusfY Offline
                                    yusfY Offline
                                    yusf
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #22

                                    Exactly what @jimcavoli said. 🎉

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      GustavoMarcante
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #23

                                      I think Jitsi and/or BigBlueButtom would be great!
                                      I hope you don't loose the timing for it, because after somebody chooses a platform for its users is difficult to change. If it were ready now I'm sure Cloudron would have many more new users.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      3
                                      • girishG Offline
                                        girishG Offline
                                        girish
                                        Staff
                                        wrote on last edited by girish
                                        #24

                                        Wanted to give some progress on the release here. Both @nebulon and I are taking a bit of break for Jitsi 🙂 We will revisit once we finish some more enjoyable tasks.

                                        • Update base image - this is done! Apps are slowly getting updated one by one.

                                        • Add support for member-only mailing lists - done!
                                          148c3c86-6ea5-4910-bc46-4bc850585cda-image.png

                                        • Default to ECC certs from Let's Encrypt - done!
                                          4d92091c-8b2a-44fe-9648-c2f6c346ebc8-image.png

                                        • Redis status - Under services, you can now tune redis instance of each app
                                          75d4f71c-8600-46b0-af3c-e5fbfc7aa281-image.png

                                        App firewall will not make it this release since the changes are stacking up.

                                        avatar1024A 1 Reply Last reply
                                        8
                                        • girishG Offline
                                          girishG Offline
                                          girish
                                          Staff
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #25

                                          Volumes/External mounting - we did a couple of iterations of this and neither of them are satisfactory. The feature itself is quite easy to implement but what we found is that other than Emby and Nextcloud most apps don't support scanning random directories for content.

                                          To go back to why people were trying external storage to start with had to do with Cloudron backups not having flexibility wrt backup policy and persistence. So, we are going to look into fixing that first instead (in this release).

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          4
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Bookmarks
                                          • Search