Galacteek on Cloudron

[cipres]

@LoudLemur Sorry bit of a late reply .. No, go-ipfs really doesn't take much disk space that's not a problem. ipfs-lite only provides the strict minimum (great project), but galacteek needs and uses the whole ipfs stack, things like streams and pubsub.

A flatpak repository is now available. I'll integrate tim's work in the main repo but i can't test it (don't have cloudron).

@timconsidine hope you're ok, thanks again for the work you did on this

[timconsidine]

@cipres thank you, bit of a tough time.
If you need me to test something, happy to do so.

[cipres]

@timconsidine Built the docker image, all good. Only thing i've changed .. i'm using "python -m http.server 8000" instead of the server.js script to run the health check service. That got me wondering how the "node /app/code/server.js" command could work because nodejs isn't being installed anywhere ?

One question: does the Dockerfile for cloudron need to be named "Dockerfile" ? Or is it allowed to have it named "Dockerfile.cloudron" for example. If not, that's fine i'll symlink it.

[cipres]

@timconsidine Just pushed the code in the pimp-my-dweb branch (see Dockerfile.cloudron). Tried the docker image, it works, and the healthcheck on port 8000 should work. Had to fix a few things, /app/code/bin wasn't in PATH, it couldn't find go-ipfs ..

[robi]

@staff is there a way to use the demo cloudron for testing new apps?

[girish]

@robi Yes, sure, install away. Are you asking for a way to make sure the app does not get uninstalled by someone else?

[robi]

@girish wasn't sure about -cli auth and apps not in the app store or 3rd party docker repos.