Mixpost
-
@jdaviescoates https://forum.cloudron.io/post/70435 still remains valid. It's not possible to package this for Cloudron .
That's not quite entirely true, no? There is a writable part in /app/data and /var/run. It could be excluded from backups too depending on what directory it is downloaded to, say a hidden .pro dir.
It's also possible to create an in-memory file system, and have it download the Pro version there at every start. Otherwise it's the lite version.
-
I started a guide for Mixpost Lite in this thread:
https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/11088/mixpost-lite-install-guide-for-lamp-appLet me know if I missed something.
-
I started a guide for Mixpost Lite in this thread:
https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/11088/mixpost-lite-install-guide-for-lamp-appLet me know if I missed something.
BTW this also works no problem in the enterprise version.
-
-
I honestly don't know how much sense it makes to package this. It seems to run super smooth in the LAMP app and there are so many different versions to keep up with packaging
-
@andreasdueren the app has to be changed/unified by Dima @lao9s if a package is to be made, and it doesn't look like he is willing to make that happen. We have plenty of paid apps packaged on Cloudron. I don't understand the rationale behind his refusal.
-
He's maybe focussing on developing it further right now and doesn't want the workload of packaging apps. I'm currently happy with the composer version as the docker one also doesn't have all the features.
-
@andreasdueren I wish it's a time/focus issue. He's worried about licensing/ownership of the app. Any way, the composer method is the same method as the guide above? It's been a while and I forgot what method I was using.
-
Yes i'ts what you've been working on. I think I followed some of the instructions somewhere here for the lite version but applied it to the enterprise one
-
Yes should work no problem