Mixpost
-
wrote on Oct 24, 2023, 5:32 PM last edited by
Any updates/ progress on getting this into the App Store? Could @Staff or any other @appdev help it along?
@lao9s I will buy a Pro licence as soon as this is in the Cloudron App Store
(also still kicking myself I didn't get a lifetime one while I could
even though I still wouldn't've been able to use it yet
)
-
Any updates/ progress on getting this into the App Store? Could @Staff or any other @appdev help it along?
@lao9s I will buy a Pro licence as soon as this is in the Cloudron App Store
(also still kicking myself I didn't get a lifetime one while I could
even though I still wouldn't've been able to use it yet
)
@jdaviescoates https://forum.cloudron.io/post/70435 still remains valid. It's not possible to package this for Cloudron .
-
@jdaviescoates https://forum.cloudron.io/post/70435 still remains valid. It's not possible to package this for Cloudron .
wrote on Oct 24, 2023, 8:50 PM last edited by -
wrote on Feb 12, 2024, 7:08 PM last edited by
Still really exciting to see this up and running on cloudron with hands on approach using the LAMP, I'm definitely going to try this out
-
@jdaviescoates https://forum.cloudron.io/post/70435 still remains valid. It's not possible to package this for Cloudron .
wrote on Feb 12, 2024, 10:06 PM last edited by@jdaviescoates https://forum.cloudron.io/post/70435 still remains valid. It's not possible to package this for Cloudron .
That's not quite entirely true, no? There is a writable part in /app/data and /var/run. It could be excluded from backups too depending on what directory it is downloaded to, say a hidden .pro dir.
It's also possible to create an in-memory file system, and have it download the Pro version there at every start. Otherwise it's the lite version.
-
@jdaviescoates https://forum.cloudron.io/post/70435 still remains valid. It's not possible to package this for Cloudron .
That's not quite entirely true, no? There is a writable part in /app/data and /var/run. It could be excluded from backups too depending on what directory it is downloaded to, say a hidden .pro dir.
It's also possible to create an in-memory file system, and have it download the Pro version there at every start. Otherwise it's the lite version.
wrote on Feb 13, 2024, 3:25 AM last edited by@robi I wish this can get sorted out. Keeping up with updates manually is a real PITA.
-
wrote on Feb 13, 2024, 4:09 AM last edited by
I started a guide for Mixpost Lite in this thread:
https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/11088/mixpost-lite-install-guide-for-lamp-appLet me know if I missed something.
-
I started a guide for Mixpost Lite in this thread:
https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/11088/mixpost-lite-install-guide-for-lamp-appLet me know if I missed something.
wrote on Mar 29, 2024, 2:34 AM last edited byI started a guide for Mixpost Lite in this thread:
https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/11088/mixpost-lite-install-guide-for-lamp-appLet me know if I missed something.
BTW this also works no problem in the enterprise version.
-
wrote on Apr 1, 2024, 5:48 PM last edited by
-
wrote on Apr 3, 2024, 5:11 PM last edited by
I honestly don't know how much sense it makes to package this. It seems to run super smooth in the LAMP app and there are so many different versions to keep up with packaging
-
I honestly don't know how much sense it makes to package this. It seems to run super smooth in the LAMP app and there are so many different versions to keep up with packaging
wrote on Apr 3, 2024, 8:23 PM last edited by@andreasdueren the app has to be changed/unified by Dima @lao9s if a package is to be made, and it doesn't look like he is willing to make that happen. We have plenty of paid apps packaged on Cloudron. I don't understand the rationale behind his refusal.
-
wrote on Apr 4, 2024, 11:42 PM last edited by
He's maybe focussing on developing it further right now and doesn't want the workload of packaging apps. I'm currently happy with the composer version as the docker one also doesn't have all the features.
-
He's maybe focussing on developing it further right now and doesn't want the workload of packaging apps. I'm currently happy with the composer version as the docker one also doesn't have all the features.
wrote on Apr 4, 2024, 11:46 PM last edited by@andreasdueren I wish it's a time/focus issue. He's worried about licensing/ownership of the app. Any way, the composer method is the same method as the guide above? It's been a while and I forgot what method I was using.
-
wrote on Apr 5, 2024, 1:06 AM last edited by
Yes i'ts what you've been working on. I think I followed some of the instructions somewhere here for the lite version but applied it to the enterprise one
-
wrote on Apr 5, 2024, 4:02 PM last edited by
So, out of curioisty.
To get the app working in the lamp app- is that the previously written up guide?
-
wrote on Apr 8, 2024, 1:59 AM last edited by
Yes should work no problem
-
wrote on Aug 8, 2024, 8:03 PM last edited by
I'm giving Mixpost another go. Fresh install. All is working except for the mail. What SMTP settings are you guys using in the .env file?
I tried a bunch of settings and currently have these, but nothing works:
# SMTP MAIL_MAILER=mail MAIL_HOST=mail MAIL_PORT=2465 MAIL_USERNAME=mixpost.app@domain.com MAIL_PASSWORD=grjk34jkl6543jklerjkl34jkl5lkj3436df4334 MAIL_ENCRYPTION=tls MAIL_FROM_ADDRESS="mixpost.app@domain.com" MAIL_FROM_NAME="${APP_NAME}"
-
I'm giving Mixpost another go. Fresh install. All is working except for the mail. What SMTP settings are you guys using in the .env file?
I tried a bunch of settings and currently have these, but nothing works:
# SMTP MAIL_MAILER=mail MAIL_HOST=mail MAIL_PORT=2465 MAIL_USERNAME=mixpost.app@domain.com MAIL_PASSWORD=grjk34jkl6543jklerjkl34jkl5lkj3436df4334 MAIL_ENCRYPTION=tls MAIL_FROM_ADDRESS="mixpost.app@domain.com" MAIL_FROM_NAME="${APP_NAME}"
wrote on Aug 9, 2024, 8:24 AM last edited by@humptydumpty said in Mixpost:
I'm giving Mixpost another go. Fresh install. All is working except for the mail. What SMTP settings are you guys using in the .env file?
I tried a bunch of settings and currently have these, but nothing works:
# SMTP MAIL_MAILER=mail MAIL_HOST=mail MAIL_PORT=2465 MAIL_USERNAME=mixpost.app@domain.com MAIL_PASSWORD=grjk34jkl6543jklerjkl34jkl5lkj3436df4334 MAIL_ENCRYPTION=tls MAIL_FROM_ADDRESS="mixpost.app@domain.com" MAIL_FROM_NAME="${APP_NAME}"
I think
MAIL_MAILER=
needs to besmtp
. At least that's what I had set up:MAIL_MAILER=smtp MAIL_HOST=mail MAIL_PORT=2465 MAIL_USERNAME=app@domain.com MAIL_PASSWORD= grjk34jkl6543jklerjkl34jkl5lkj3436df4334 MAIL_ENCRYPTION=tls MAIL_FROM_ADDRESS="app@domain.com" MAIL_FROM_NAME="${APP_NAME}"
I honestly don't really see the point in packaging it thought, works perfectly in the LAMP app.
-
@humptydumpty said in Mixpost:
I'm giving Mixpost another go. Fresh install. All is working except for the mail. What SMTP settings are you guys using in the .env file?
I tried a bunch of settings and currently have these, but nothing works:
# SMTP MAIL_MAILER=mail MAIL_HOST=mail MAIL_PORT=2465 MAIL_USERNAME=mixpost.app@domain.com MAIL_PASSWORD=grjk34jkl6543jklerjkl34jkl5lkj3436df4334 MAIL_ENCRYPTION=tls MAIL_FROM_ADDRESS="mixpost.app@domain.com" MAIL_FROM_NAME="${APP_NAME}"
I think
MAIL_MAILER=
needs to besmtp
. At least that's what I had set up:MAIL_MAILER=smtp MAIL_HOST=mail MAIL_PORT=2465 MAIL_USERNAME=app@domain.com MAIL_PASSWORD= grjk34jkl6543jklerjkl34jkl5lkj3436df4334 MAIL_ENCRYPTION=tls MAIL_FROM_ADDRESS="app@domain.com" MAIL_FROM_NAME="${APP_NAME}"
I honestly don't really see the point in packaging it thought, works perfectly in the LAMP app.
wrote on Aug 9, 2024, 8:56 AM last edited by@andreasdueren said in Mixpost:
I honestly don't really see the point in packaging it thought, works perfectly in the LAMP app.
Loads of apps could in theory work perfectly in the LAMP app - but it requires a load of work to set-up. Having it packaged would save all that work.
-
@andreasdueren said in Mixpost:
I honestly don't really see the point in packaging it thought, works perfectly in the LAMP app.
Loads of apps could in theory work perfectly in the LAMP app - but it requires a load of work to set-up. Having it packaged would save all that work.
wrote on Aug 9, 2024, 12:13 PM last edited by@jdaviescoates exactly! I spent over two hours reinstalling mixpost yesterday. Most of that time was spent re-reading all the forum posts and docs to refresh my memory. Upgrading will still be a manual hassle too. Thereβs also an unsolved mystery, symphony; what is keeping horizon running?