Cubby is great!

[LoudLemur]

Cubby is available on Cloudron now and under heavy development.

I tried it and found it was excellent for organizing files kept on a remote server, some of which you might be making available elsewhere.

Learning Cubby only takes a few moment, and it requires few resources.

I recommend it and hope more people find it useful too.

https://getcubby.org/

[girish]

We plan to develop it with a lot more speed in the coming months. But if you have some missing priority feature, let us know.

[LoudLemur]

@girish Thanks.

Cubby could possibly be integrated with Cloudron to provide its file browser...

When Cubby is run on Cloudron, it would be nice to see a "integrate with..." menu, which would connect Cubby with other applications running on the Cloudron.

[timconsidine]

@LoudLemur Understand the motivation and also the usefulness in certain use cases.
But (repeating another comment elsewhere) I like that Cubby is separate and reduces/eliminates any risk of "link bleeding" or hijacking of links.

I guess that if integration is implemented, it could just be disabled.
At least that is what I would request.
In that way its standalone / segregated implementation can be retained.

[girish]

@LoudLemur @timconsidine We actually have such discussions quite often Surfer, Cubby and File manager have 3 separate file manager systems by now and often we wonder if we should merge them all. Unfortunately, they all use different UI frameworks making it hard to componentize.

[LoudLemur]

@timconsidine said in Cubby is great!:

@LoudLemur Understand the motivation and also the usefulness in certain use cases.
But (repeating another comment elsewhere) I like that Cubby is separate and reduces/eliminates any risk of "link bleeding" or hijacking of links.

I guess that if integration is implemented, it could just be disabled.
At least that is what I would request.
In that way its standalone / segregated implementation can be retained.

I didn't think of that. It would be important.