Stirling PDF on Cloudron
-
@marcusquinn said in Stirling PDF on Cloudron:
@froodle Amazingly difficult to get paid for vast amounts of effort that helps the world, eh!
-
@robi I'd always feel awkward with adverts with open source. If I ever implement something like this I'd have to be opt in. Has bad conatations with tracking etc and anti OSS (even though the site you linked looks awesome for what they stand for)
I have considered a business version with premium features but it's hard with licensing with code reuse and ideally I'd want all features on both and not limit the FOSS.
I considering something like adding a 2 concurrent Web client limit for OSS maybe
Shall see where it takes me... ethically I might just keep it open forever
It's nice hearing people cancel adobe subscriptions because of it -
@LoudLemur Yeah. That's not gonna happen, as too many people in the government jobs using them as springboards to the companies they direct spending to. Seen it 1st-hand and shamelessly gleefully.
-
@froodle Probably Paddle, as they are then the merchant of record. Or LemonSqueezy.
EspoCRM has a pretty good FOSS + Paid model that keeps both types of user very happy. Give away the framework, sell the implementation/content.
-
@Neiluj said in Stirling PDF on Cloudron:
@froodle Could Open Collective be relevant / of interest here?
https://opencollective.com/
I only know of them from contributing once and the little I read about them.Yes, I agree! @froodle should absolutely create a collective on Open Collective! It was created exactly for this, is open source itself and they have exciting plans to Exit to Community (see https://opencollective.com/e2c )
See also https://liberapay.com/ (can't hurt to be on there too)
-
@Neiluj reached out to them
"We don't accept projects hosted under personal profiles. Our mission is to support groups rather than individuals. Have you considered moving it to a separate GitHub org? This helps to signal that this project is a collaboration instead of a personal undertaking."
I'll have to think about how best to do this and pros and cons
-
@froodle said in Stirling PDF on Cloudron:
@Neiluj reached out to them
"We don't accept projects hosted under personal profiles. Our mission is to support groups rather than individuals. Have you considered moving it to a separate GitHub org? This helps to signal that this project is a collaboration instead of a personal undertaking."
I'll have to think about how best to do this and pros and cons
I'd guess that is just the policy of their default Open Source Collective fiscal host https://opencollective.com/opensource
Note there are many other fiscal hosts on Open Collective who likely have less arduous policies (saying that, I'd guess it probably does make sense for you to be hosted by the Open Source Collective)