Cloudron Forum

Hi @girish, thank you for your response. I was exploring the possibility of creating an internal knowledge base for the team and an external one for the public using one instance of Documize. However, it doesn't seem like a good option.

Can we use Documize as a multi-tenanted application on Cloudron?

From the documentation:

"Documize is a fully multi-tenanted application capable of serving multiple separated customers from within the same running instance.

A single Documize installation supports multiple tenants and identifies different tenants based upon URL.

• https://legal.example.org
• https://finance.example.org
• https://tech.example.org

A Documize user can have access to one or more tenants. Each tenants data is protected from the other tenants."

Some recent updates related to Zulip:

• Zulip has an officially supported, experimental docker image
• Zulip 7.0 was recently released: visual redesign, scheduling messages, streamlining messages, and more.

More information below:
https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/stable/production/deployment.html#zulip-in-docker
https://github.com/zulip/docker-zulip
https://blog.zulip.com/2023/05/31/zulip-7-0-released/

Hi Cloudron team,

I'm interested in using Metabase and Baserow together. From what I understand, Baserow uses PostgreSQL, and PostgreSQL is one of the official data sources supported by Metabase.

Could it be possible to connect both of these applications in Cloudron?

Thank you for your time and support.

Regards,
Alex

Zulip is one of the applications I use daily and is essential to me. I'm using it for an open-source project, self-hosted. I would be thrilled if it could be an application I could install on Cloudron and use with n8n, Baserow, Jitsi, and other applications available in Cloudron.

Some of the best examples/use cases of using Zulip and its advantages are below:

• How RC uses Zulip
• How to make remote work: Zulip

In addition, they recently have added a public access option, where anyone can view a topic without signing up simply by sharing a link.

One of the largest reasons I use Zulip is to have chats and our information organized as a knowledge base, it's our community's source of truth.

I hope the team considers making Zulip available on Cloudron.

Thank you for all of your hard work and support.

Regards,
Alex

@girish said in Baserow 1.9 and it's Dockerfile and packaging changes:

@nigel_baserow sorry for the late reply!

As @robi mentioned, all our apps are based on the same base image. This is mostly to maintain consistency and saves us a lot of developer time in terms of maintaining these images. The base image also needs to have many packages that are expected by the Cloudron tooling - the web terminal, upload, extract features all depend on the base image having various packages pre-installed.

In general, we are comfortable with the cloudron packaging and the upstream docker image diverging. From what we have seen, the goals of these images are quite different. Upstream images want to support a wide variety of configurations and have different optimizations in mind. The Cloudron image on the other hand is pre-configured (database, email, storage, auth etc) and has various security restrictions (read only file system, non-root user etc).

We are happy to make the changes needed to the cloudron packaging with your help (this is just a matter of adapting what you have written to the cloudron image, I think). So, I think 1) is the way to go. Another thing is that removing mjml service is not a problem at all. In fact, that is the advantage of cloudron packaging, the docker images can be thrown away and replaced with another as long as the docker image can handle the "data" from the previous version.

Hello, thank you for building Cloudron, and all of the work that has gone into it.

Baserow is one of the applications that I use a lot on Cloudron and I intend to use it further in combination with n8n and other applications.

What's the status of updating Baserow to 1.9 in Cloudron?

Thank you for your time and support.