Cloudron Forum

Will take a look - Thank you @loudlemur

@luckow said:

@jdaviescoates as fas as i know:
2fauth
...
yourls

Is there such list for Community apps also?

Thanks @staff and @all for the prompt community actions

I can confirm that I have tested this and it works:

1. use the server URL without the "caldav" suffix. e.g. https://mytymeslotinstance.mycloudon.com/
2. from within cloudron, create an app password for the related user and use this password in tymeslot calendar integration

Thanks for the help/the fix @ekevu123

When creating a Meeting Type or an availability Schedule, it would be great to be able to "duplicate" or "copy from" an existing one.

Depending on the this would represent a certain amount of gained time at setup.

An addition/alternative would be the possibility to define Meeting Time / availability Schedule Template, to derivate from when creating individual ones.

This template system could also be relevant when deploying Tymeslot in an enterprise, where preset-enterprise template could be used by individual users to create individual meeting Type / availability schedule, based on company requirements (set in the template).

Hopefully this makes sense too

Here are a few features request/ideas around theming in Tymeslot

It would be great if one could:

• set transparency % of the booking frame on the booking page
• set particular font
• reduce/increase relative size of the booking frame on the booking page
• Align the whole booking frame left or center or right on the booking page
• possibility to add a company logo somewhere in the booking frame

More interestingly:

• Define and impose/lock theming to all users of a Tymeslot app instance (enforce company branding / uniform theming for all users of a related instance)

Polls seem like a complimentary addition to Tymeslot

The ability to link a polls to a meeting type is quite interesting, I found, especially when the meeting appointment is automatically created/generated once the poll is completed.

However, here is a couple of questions related to polls:

• it is possible to cancel a poll, but I cannot find a way to delete a poll (whether the poll is already cancelled or confirmed). is this by design or could this be added?
• is it possible to de-activate polls from the app centrally and entirely (via an env variable for example), should this not be needed / wanted in a company environment (or alternatively, granted via user role/permissions)?
• right now, when a poll has been created, the owner of the poll receives an email that says "Everyone has voted on Polls_name" as soon as one person has voted, no matter if you are expecting more people to vote. This is somewhat confusing.
  Also, the person who voted does not receive any mail confirmation that the vote was taken into account.

Additionally, here are a few suggestions/ideas for the polls

• ability to create a polls as a draft and then make it online(publish)/offline(unpublish) with the toggle of a button or programmatically
• ability to edit a poll when in a draft status or unpublished
• ability to share a poll via email with personalized/unique link to make this semi private (would also prefilled the name/email on the poll page)

These are just ideas/comments from playing around with it.
Thanks again @ekevu123 for the great product.

(still pinging @ekevu123 - I hope it is still ok to do so)

At the moment when creating a new meeting type, in the "location & calendar" section, one define a booking destination by 1. selecting a calendar account and 2. selecting a specific calendar.

This is clearly define and represent the calendar where the bookings are going to be recorded

In this section I think this would be a great addition to have an "3. select calendar(s) to check for conflict" step.

• This could/should/ list all the calendars available withing the selected calendar account, with a checkbox next to each.
• By default the specific calendar selected in step 2. would be automatically checked.
• yet doing this would make it possible to check additional calendar within the same account, for present availability and avoid double bookings.

Rational:
as an example, my availability is regularly split in between multiple calendars: 1 personal calendar, 1 group/team calendar etc..

being able to check for conflict with both calendar before making a booking effective in my personal calendar would be a great addition.

I hope this makes sense - thanks for considering,

(pinging @ekevu123 - I hope it is ok to do so)

Currently scheduling preferences (Buffer time, Minimum booking notice etc..) are defined per availability schedule / at the availability level.

I believe that it would be more meaningful, if these scheduling preferences were:

• either moved and defined at the meeting type level
• Or could be overwritten by scheduling preferences set at the meeting type level

Rational:

• Availability schedules are defined so that one schedule can be linked with multiple meeting types.
• having scheduling preferences linked with a given availability schedule regularly has for consequences to have one availability schedule for each meeting type, because of conflicting scheduling preferences imperative.

For example:

• my Availability schedule is Mon-Fri 8h-18h
• I have two meeting type:
  • One is for "personal conversation" for which I require a buffer time of at least 10 after a new booking and a minimum notice time of "12h"
  • another one is for " Quick support" for which I have no buffer time requirement and minimum notice time is "instant"

Currently this can only be achieved with two meting types and two different availability schedules, thus defeating the point of having re-usable availabilities in the first place.

I hope that this make sense

Hi,

In trying to set a custom video background design, uploading a custom video fails with the following error:

Video processing is unavailable on this server because ffmpeg is not installed. Install ffmpeg or use a background image instead.

I suppose that this is because ffmpeg is missing from the Cloudron package, following the move to Cloudron new base image (similar to here)

Hi,

When using a custom theme and having image as a background design option, you have the possibility to upload your own image.

In doing so, and despite matching the requirement (jpg, png or webp) I am having mixed results, when sometime it works, some other it does not and I have no explanation why.

Results varies between:

• upload successfully and is applied to the booking page
• upload successfully and is not applied to the booking page
• failed to upload with modal error "Invalid file format. Please upload a valid file format" (despite being a jpg file within the requirement)

tried on multiple instances and via multiple browser with the same results.
Also, I had more successes with webp, but jpg and png are proving to be challenging.

Happy to provide more info if necessary.

Is anyone else experiencing the same issue?

Thanks a lot - I'll test and revert back!

@timconsidine many thanks for this - it looks really interesting to me.

short question about the multi-user: the usage notes mention

A single-user workspace is available immediately with no login required. To enforce login and add additional users, enable auth via Settings → General (or the access/admin section).

I cannot find this option anywhere.

However, there is definitely an /admin/users page allowing to administer users, but it is impossible to add a user because "Auth is diabled".

Maybe you know more about this?

Many thanks for packing this already.

12.2 is out now.

I am curious to know if we are far from a new Cloudron package release?

@ekevu123 said:

Correct, that should work!

Also, you can now manage environment variables directly in Cloudron.

Thanks for this.

What is the approach on this? Is the cloudron package supposed to create a env file on install?
Is there more info somewhere about this? I could not find any in the cloudron package doc.

Many thanks

@sponch
My current understanding is that the script that I made is changing the dynDNS logic that it currently implemented in Cloudron (batching DNS records to update in a single call vs one call per DNS record).

Without checking further, I believe that Cloudron's logic is the same for all DNS providers, which make it difficult to change or make exception for a single one like deSEC and therefore to implement.

However, this is only an hypothesis for now. It would need confirmation from a Cloudron member of staff I suppose.

@loudlemur Thanks for considering packaging paperclip.

Paperclip - Open-Source Orchestration Platform for Teams of AI Agents at Work

---

• Main Page: https://paperclip.ing
• Git: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip
• Licence: MIT
• Dockerfile: Yes - Official image at ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip
• Docker-compose: Yes - Generated via npx paperclipai onboard CLI (Paperclip server, PostgreSQL, Redis, optional Qdrant); deployment docs included
• Demo: No public demo — live demo video on the Paperclip blog; can try without installing via npx paperclipai (no Paperclip account required)

---

• Summary:
  • Open-source app (74k+ GitHub stars) for managing AI agents at work — "if OpenClaw is an employee, Paperclip is the company" — bringing your own agents (OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Bash, HTTP, and local agents like Gemini, OpenCode, Grok Build) into a single control plane
  • Models companies with org charts, roles, reporting lines, goals, budgets, and approval gates so you can assign work to agents and track progress and costs from one dashboard
  • Node.js server + React UI; runs with an embedded PostgreSQL database or your own, supports background-service installs on Linux/macOS, and includes governance features like audit trails, approval gates, and budget limits
  • OIDC Currently possible via plugin more info here

---

• Notes:
  • Perfect for teams wanting to run "autonomous AI companies" on their own infrastructure — MIT licensed, fully self-hosted, 100% of data stays on your infra
  • Requires bring-your-own agent runtimes and API keys to be useful, and the multi-service stack (server, Postgres, Redis) makes it more involved to deploy than single-binary apps

---

• Alternative to / Libhunt link:
• Screenshots: live demo video

@joseph said:

As a heads up, deSEC has some lots of rate limits (reported elsewhere in the forum). So, if you have lots of subdomains with dynamic DNS you hit these limits.

@sponch see here for the details of rate limiting with DeSEC for example (there are a few other threads on the forum too)

However, I also need to point out that this is avoidable (at least to an extend). I have made exactly what I suggested in the mentioned thread:
A dedicated script pooling and updating deSEC DNS records in batch instead of a one call for each. This, so far, as worked just fine.

Hi @timconsidine

@Teiluj I will take a look at this (no promises).

Even for considering, thank you already

Without hijacking the thread, have you seen my LocalPlaud community app ?
It’s not the same but it’s in the same space, and it is already packaged / published.

I actually did have a look and was quite interested but I am not familiar with Plaud and by the looks of it, it is the kind of application that I would initially ran away (maybe wrongly) from because of privacy and security concerns.

You don’t need a Plaud device to use LocalPlaud - now copes with dictating into it and uploading recordings.

I did not know this and it goes miles into alleviating my Plaud concerns. I will git it a try!

@girish said:

@jdaviescoates It's not completely fleshed out yet. The options are - We can map Cloudron group to a mailing list. Another option is to have something like Google groups. Third option is something like a mailing list (the traditional one with unsubscribe links). This last one, I am not sure if anyone uses it anymore (outside of newsletters).

Would it be greedy to maybe have the 3 options to choose from at the mailing list creation time?
I can easily see use cases for the 3.