Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Offical apps | Community apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Community Packages
  3. Hermes Agent

Hermes Agent

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Community Packages
34 Posts 11 Posters 2.8k Views 11 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M
    M
    msbt
    App Dev
    wrote last edited by
    #21

    @andreasdueren aye, thanks for checking it out!

    Happy Hosting & Web Development

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • A
      A
      alpheus
      wrote last edited by
      #22

      @andreasdueren hello Andreas!
      I have an issue with setting the HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS for scheduled cron jobs. Scheduled cron does phone number extraction and reports it to telegram, but the phone numbers arrive redacted (+49*****1234). If I create a one-off cron and then execute it via hermes cron ... then the redaction doesn't happen (phone numbers are visible).

      I think the issue is that the main gateway process doesn't pick up the value that I wrote in the .env file (false), which results in phone numbers being redacted when they are outputted to telegram.
      If you want to go into the issue with much more depth, below is the detailed summary from my agent of all the things we tried and all the findings that might be useful.

      This happened on HermesAgent app version 0.4.61, but I would guess that the issue still persists.
      Thank you for your time and dedication to the project maintenance!

      Agent summary

      Short version
      python -m gateway.run imports agent.redact before gateway.run loads ~/.hermes/.env, so HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS=false arrives too late for its import-time snapshot.
      Fixing that alone won't solve it though: the gateway's final outbound delivery call forces redaction regardless, and scheduled cron output passes through both scheduler and gateway redaction layers.

      Root causes identified

      • agent/redact.py snapshots HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS at import time (_REDACT_ENABLED = os.getenv(...)), so it must be set before agent.redact is imported.
      • The Cloudron supervisor's environment= list for hermes-gateway includes HERMES_HOME etc., but not HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS/HERMES_REDACT_PHONES.
      • gateway/run.py imports agent modules (which import agent.redact) near the top, but only calls load_hermes_dotenv() much later (~line 1829) — so the .env loads after the snapshot is taken.
      • gateway/run.py::_redact_gateway_user_facing_secrets() calls redact_sensitive_text(text, force=True) — this bypasses _REDACT_ENABLED entirely, so security.redact_secrets: false in config.yaml has no effect on this path.
      • The phone regex also misses Serbian local format and international numbers with a space after the country code.
      • cron/scheduler.py redacts no_agent stdout/stderr independently, then the gateway applies its own forced pass — so scheduled jobs go through two redaction layers.

      What we tried

      • We tested: security.redact_secrets: false in config.yaml
      • HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS=false in .env
      • editing supervisord's environment directly (not durable — file is app-owned and replaced on updates)
      • a sitecustomize.py early-patch (confirmed _REDACT_ENABLED=False standalone, but scheduled Telegram delivery still redacted due to force=True)
      • disabling phone matching + HERMES_REDACT_PHONES=false (still redacted in the real delivery path)
      andreasduerenA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A alpheus

        @andreasdueren hello Andreas!
        I have an issue with setting the HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS for scheduled cron jobs. Scheduled cron does phone number extraction and reports it to telegram, but the phone numbers arrive redacted (+49*****1234). If I create a one-off cron and then execute it via hermes cron ... then the redaction doesn't happen (phone numbers are visible).

        I think the issue is that the main gateway process doesn't pick up the value that I wrote in the .env file (false), which results in phone numbers being redacted when they are outputted to telegram.
        If you want to go into the issue with much more depth, below is the detailed summary from my agent of all the things we tried and all the findings that might be useful.

        This happened on HermesAgent app version 0.4.61, but I would guess that the issue still persists.
        Thank you for your time and dedication to the project maintenance!

        Agent summary

        Short version
        python -m gateway.run imports agent.redact before gateway.run loads ~/.hermes/.env, so HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS=false arrives too late for its import-time snapshot.
        Fixing that alone won't solve it though: the gateway's final outbound delivery call forces redaction regardless, and scheduled cron output passes through both scheduler and gateway redaction layers.

        Root causes identified

        • agent/redact.py snapshots HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS at import time (_REDACT_ENABLED = os.getenv(...)), so it must be set before agent.redact is imported.
        • The Cloudron supervisor's environment= list for hermes-gateway includes HERMES_HOME etc., but not HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS/HERMES_REDACT_PHONES.
        • gateway/run.py imports agent modules (which import agent.redact) near the top, but only calls load_hermes_dotenv() much later (~line 1829) — so the .env loads after the snapshot is taken.
        • gateway/run.py::_redact_gateway_user_facing_secrets() calls redact_sensitive_text(text, force=True) — this bypasses _REDACT_ENABLED entirely, so security.redact_secrets: false in config.yaml has no effect on this path.
        • The phone regex also misses Serbian local format and international numbers with a space after the country code.
        • cron/scheduler.py redacts no_agent stdout/stderr independently, then the gateway applies its own forced pass — so scheduled jobs go through two redaction layers.

        What we tried

        • We tested: security.redact_secrets: false in config.yaml
        • HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS=false in .env
        • editing supervisord's environment directly (not durable — file is app-owned and replaced on updates)
        • a sitecustomize.py early-patch (confirmed _REDACT_ENABLED=False standalone, but scheduled Telegram delivery still redacted due to force=True)
        • disabling phone matching + HERMES_REDACT_PHONES=false (still redacted in the real delivery path)
        andreasduerenA
        andreasduerenA
        andreasdueren
        App Dev
        wrote last edited by
        #23

        @alpheus I pushed 0.4.87 which should resolve this

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • WiseMetalheadW
          WiseMetalheadW
          WiseMetalhead
          translator
          wrote last edited by
          #24

          Am I right in thinking that Incoming Email in the Cloudron app settings currently doesn't work? Whenever I try to configure the mailbox, I always get these errors in the logs:

          Sep 02 17:03:52 2026-09-02 14:03:52,991 ERROR hermes_plugins.email_platform.adapter: [Email] SMTP connection failed: STARTTLS extension not supported by server.
          
          Sep 02 17:03:53 2026-09-02 14:03:53,013 WARNING gateway.run: ✗ email failed to connect
          

          And if I send an email to that address, the agent doesn't respond at all.

          Outgoing email works fine, but only if I leave the default settings unchanged after installing the app.

          andreasduerenA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • andreasduerenA andreasdueren

            @alpheus I pushed 0.4.87 which should resolve this

            A
            A
            alpheus
            wrote last edited by
            #25

            @andreasdueren thank you for the fix! I will update hermes in the next few days to the latest version and let you know if it fixed it! Thanks for the fast effort and update!

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • WiseMetalheadW WiseMetalhead

              Am I right in thinking that Incoming Email in the Cloudron app settings currently doesn't work? Whenever I try to configure the mailbox, I always get these errors in the logs:

              Sep 02 17:03:52 2026-09-02 14:03:52,991 ERROR hermes_plugins.email_platform.adapter: [Email] SMTP connection failed: STARTTLS extension not supported by server.
              
              Sep 02 17:03:53 2026-09-02 14:03:53,013 WARNING gateway.run: ✗ email failed to connect
              

              And if I send an email to that address, the agent doesn't respond at all.

              Outgoing email works fine, but only if I leave the default settings unchanged after installing the app.

              andreasduerenA
              andreasduerenA
              andreasdueren
              App Dev
              wrote last edited by
              #26

              @WiseMetalhead Please update to 0.4.88. It should work now.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • nostrdevN
                nostrdevN
                nostrdev
                wrote last edited by
                #27

                @andreasdueren we were initially tempted to use cloudron for packaging agents but given the many documented cases of AI breaking out of containers, compounded by the amount of unencrypted internal cloudron comms and ports being available, we backed away

                We are now evaluating firecracker on a dedicated machine for agent hosting

                Curious what your (and others) position is with regard to the risks of running agents on cloudron containers

                timconsidineT 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • nostrdevN nostrdev

                  @andreasdueren we were initially tempted to use cloudron for packaging agents but given the many documented cases of AI breaking out of containers, compounded by the amount of unencrypted internal cloudron comms and ports being available, we backed away

                  We are now evaluating firecracker on a dedicated machine for agent hosting

                  Curious what your (and others) position is with regard to the risks of running agents on cloudron containers

                  timconsidineT
                  timconsidineT
                  timconsidine
                  App Dev
                  wrote last edited by timconsidine
                  #28

                  @nostrdev E2B ? Kata ? Something else ?
                  (Probably a slippery slope needing its own discuss or off-topic thread, based on your thought-provoking question touching many surfaces).

                  Indie app dev, huge fan of Cloudron PaaS, scratching my itches : communityapps.appx.uk

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • nostrdevN nostrdev referenced this topic
                  • nostrdevN
                    nostrdevN
                    nostrdev
                    wrote last edited by
                    #29

                    slippery and off-topic indeed - put some iterations into it and made a new topic here. it's a subject that many, if not most, of us are interested in, has probably been well discussed before.

                    https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/15921/running-ai-agents-on-cloudron-infiltrating-other-containers-and-admin-services

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • A
                      A
                      alpheus
                      wrote last edited by alpheus
                      #30

                      @andreasdueren Hi again!
                      I updated to the latest version (0.4.89) and I can confirm that HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS is successfully read from scheduled cron jobs!
                      Thanks for the fix!

                      Now I have a new but similar issue issue with GITHUB_TOKEN - it is present in the .env (agent confirms that in the chat), but it's not being read in the cron.

                      Here is the report from the agent:
                      The cron scheduler runs inside the gateway process. When it spawns the no_agent script, it builds the child env via
                      build_subprocess_env() → _sanitize_subprocess_env()
                      which unconditionally strips GITHUB_TOKEN / GH_TOKEN (they're in _ALWAYS_STRIP_KEYS in tools/environments/local.py).

                      The token is present in /app/data/.hermes/.env (line 436, uncommented, len 93) and in my interactive shell, but it never reaches the cron script's subprocess. This is a design conflict: the backup runner needs the token, but Hermes' secret-scrub policy deliberately removes it from child processes. GITHUB_TOKEN is not registered in config.yaml terminal.env_passthrough, so the scrub isn't bypassed.

                      Proposed fix (from our side, not yours)
                      A small wrapper-only code change in our python script that uses github for backup – not a config.yaml change and not a gateway restart.

                      Current flow:

                      cron scheduler (sanitized env; token stripped)
                        → github_backup_publish.py
                            → run_github_backup.py --publish
                      

                      Proposed flow:

                      cron scheduler (sanitized env)
                      → github_backup_publish.py
                          → read /app/data/.hermes/.env internally
                          → extract only GITHUB_TOKEN
                          → start run_github_backup.py with the existing sanitized env + only GITHUB_TOKEN
                      

                      After I did this workaround, the github token is successfully read.

                      My question for you

                      is this something you could also fix, or I should keep this (or some better) workaround?

                      Thank you once again for your time!

                      andreasduerenA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A alpheus

                        @andreasdueren Hi again!
                        I updated to the latest version (0.4.89) and I can confirm that HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS is successfully read from scheduled cron jobs!
                        Thanks for the fix!

                        Now I have a new but similar issue issue with GITHUB_TOKEN - it is present in the .env (agent confirms that in the chat), but it's not being read in the cron.

                        Here is the report from the agent:
                        The cron scheduler runs inside the gateway process. When it spawns the no_agent script, it builds the child env via
                        build_subprocess_env() → _sanitize_subprocess_env()
                        which unconditionally strips GITHUB_TOKEN / GH_TOKEN (they're in _ALWAYS_STRIP_KEYS in tools/environments/local.py).

                        The token is present in /app/data/.hermes/.env (line 436, uncommented, len 93) and in my interactive shell, but it never reaches the cron script's subprocess. This is a design conflict: the backup runner needs the token, but Hermes' secret-scrub policy deliberately removes it from child processes. GITHUB_TOKEN is not registered in config.yaml terminal.env_passthrough, so the scrub isn't bypassed.

                        Proposed fix (from our side, not yours)
                        A small wrapper-only code change in our python script that uses github for backup – not a config.yaml change and not a gateway restart.

                        Current flow:

                        cron scheduler (sanitized env; token stripped)
                          → github_backup_publish.py
                              → run_github_backup.py --publish
                        

                        Proposed flow:

                        cron scheduler (sanitized env)
                        → github_backup_publish.py
                            → read /app/data/.hermes/.env internally
                            → extract only GITHUB_TOKEN
                            → start run_github_backup.py with the existing sanitized env + only GITHUB_TOKEN
                        

                        After I did this workaround, the github token is successfully read.

                        My question for you

                        is this something you could also fix, or I should keep this (or some better) workaround?

                        Thank you once again for your time!

                        andreasduerenA
                        andreasduerenA
                        andreasdueren
                        App Dev
                        wrote last edited by
                        #31

                        I looked into this further. The missing token is a consequence of upstream Hermes deliberately filtering credentials from subprocess environments, rather than a Cloudron-specific environment issue.

                        Upstream does offer general environment passthrough, but it explicitly prevents that mechanism from overriding its protected credential blocklist. It also does not currently provide an operator-controlled, per-script credential allowlist for cron jobs.

                        I’m trying to keep this package as close to upstream as possible, so I won’t be adding a package-specific workaround for that filtering. Maintaining a separate credential-passing mechanism would add complexity and behavior that could diverge from upstream’s security decisions.

                        A scoped way to give trusted cron scripts access to selected credentials seems like a reasonable upstream feature request. I’d prefer to use an upstream-supported solution if one becomes available, rather than implement a parallel mechanism in the Cloudron package.

                        @alpheus

                        A 1 Reply Last reply
                        5
                        • andreasduerenA andreasdueren

                          I looked into this further. The missing token is a consequence of upstream Hermes deliberately filtering credentials from subprocess environments, rather than a Cloudron-specific environment issue.

                          Upstream does offer general environment passthrough, but it explicitly prevents that mechanism from overriding its protected credential blocklist. It also does not currently provide an operator-controlled, per-script credential allowlist for cron jobs.

                          I’m trying to keep this package as close to upstream as possible, so I won’t be adding a package-specific workaround for that filtering. Maintaining a separate credential-passing mechanism would add complexity and behavior that could diverge from upstream’s security decisions.

                          A scoped way to give trusted cron scripts access to selected credentials seems like a reasonable upstream feature request. I’d prefer to use an upstream-supported solution if one becomes available, rather than implement a parallel mechanism in the Cloudron package.

                          @alpheus

                          A
                          A
                          alpheus
                          wrote last edited by
                          #32

                          @andreasdueren thank you for the response! Makes sense, I will use the current solution until hermes releases the feature.

                          Once again, thanks for maintenance of the cloudron app!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • micmcM
                            micmcM
                            micmc
                            wrote last edited by micmc
                            #33

                            I've installed hermes recently and the only issue I have as far as I can see is that the Chat in the Web UI does not seem to work it keeps disconnecting with this message at the top "Chat connection interrupted (code 1006). Reconnecting..." and "WebSocket connection failed".
                            On the other hand it works well in the app's terminal. So i wonder if this is on purpose for the sake of running in CR?
                            I've tried a few things even asked hermes how to fix it, but what it suggested did not work. And this is the main line of error message I get in the log

                            2026-09-15 14:52:01,841 WARNING hermes_cli.web_server: pty refused: origin_mismatch origin=https://hermes-agent.xxxx.xxx bound=127.0.0.1 peer=127.0.0.1
                            

                            I've looking in this thread but found not the same probem.
                            Anyone having the same issue or know how to fix it (if fixable in Cloudron of course)

                            AI Intelligencia RED PILL Podcast
                            (coming soon...)

                            andreasduerenA 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • micmcM micmc

                              I've installed hermes recently and the only issue I have as far as I can see is that the Chat in the Web UI does not seem to work it keeps disconnecting with this message at the top "Chat connection interrupted (code 1006). Reconnecting..." and "WebSocket connection failed".
                              On the other hand it works well in the app's terminal. So i wonder if this is on purpose for the sake of running in CR?
                              I've tried a few things even asked hermes how to fix it, but what it suggested did not work. And this is the main line of error message I get in the log

                              2026-09-15 14:52:01,841 WARNING hermes_cli.web_server: pty refused: origin_mismatch origin=https://hermes-agent.xxxx.xxx bound=127.0.0.1 peer=127.0.0.1
                              

                              I've looking in this thread but found not the same probem.
                              Anyone having the same issue or know how to fix it (if fixable in Cloudron of course)

                              andreasduerenA
                              andreasduerenA
                              andreasdueren
                              App Dev
                              wrote last edited by
                              #34

                              @micmc Thanks for the detailed log. This isn’t intentional, I simply don’t use the web UI and didn’t catch it. I traced it to the dashboard’s WebSocket origin check: the browser connects through the public Cloudron URL, but Hermes only recognizes its internal loopback address. That explains why terminal access works while web chat keeps disconnecting.

                              While working on this, I found that upstream provides a public-URL setting specifically for reverse-proxy setups. Using it also requires native dashboard authentication, so I’ve implemented the upstream Nous OAuth login flow in the package rather than bypassing the origin check.

                              The changes are implemented in 0.4.91. I haven’t been able to verify the complete login and browser-chat flow. This will introduce a Nous login and a one-time OAuth client registration for the dashboard, which I documented with the update.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2

                              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                              Register Login
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Bookmarks
                              • Search