2FA for all LDAP apps

[fbartels]

I agree with @mehdi. That workflow also comes with the downside that while the actual owner of the account does not know his/her own password, you (as the admin) actually now it yourself.

Rather enforce secure passwords and rotate them regularly (in addition to encouraging users to use password managers).

[mehdi]

@fbartels said in 2FA for all LDAP apps:

and rotate them regularly

(Forcing password rotation when there has been no indication of compromise has actually been proven experimentally to lower security, rather than enhance it : if encourages users to chose simpler passwords, because they're gonna have to remember more passwords)

[girish]

@mehdi said in 2FA for all LDAP apps:

Forcing password rotation when there has been no indication of compromise has actually been proven experimentally to lower security

This seems to be one of those counter-intuitive ideas. I had no idea it actually lowers security.

[Lonkle]

I never realized it, but on sites that make me change the password periodically, I totally do keep making them simpler because it's confusing even with password managers cause they mess up saving passwords a lot on password reset pages.

[marcusquinn]

@Lonk yeah, I hate those forced password changing policies, they are a security risk in themselves as they just increase the likelihood of a keystroke logger being able to capture.

I wrote more on the subject of password security for our team policy here:

https://brandlight.org/h/policies/password-security-policy/

And my thoughts on Security here:

https://www.marcusquinn.com/security/

Hopefully something of interest there to those with similar responsibilities for data security.

[Lonkle]

@marcusquinn Security has become my newest point of interest in the programming world - amazing how ridiculously insecure things were even 15 years ago.

[marcusquinn]

@Lonk agreed, and misinformation and information-overload cause a lot of vulnerabilities for people that don't know what we do, and even we find difficult to truly solve. Steps in the right direction though.

[marcusquinn]

What most people don't realise is that all the add-ons, extensions and social-logins would once have been considered trojans for the snooping capabilities they have.

I mentioned "coffee machine" on a phone call to a friend, hadn't typed it in anywhere or searched anything. Next time I look at Twitter the first ad is for a Nespresso machine.

So, it doesn't matter how good my security is, we all rely on the security of everyone we are connected to.

[jdaviescoates]

@marcusquinn said in 2FA for all LDAP apps:

Next time I look at Twitter the first ad is for a Nespresso machine.

I only ever look at Twitter through Firefox with ublock origin installed, so don't see ads on there.

The UX is a bit shit in the mobile browser (especially since recent Firefox update, ironically), but that helps me to use it less on my mobile!

[marcusquinn]

@jdaviescoates Interesting, I deleted the Facebook app a long time ago. Makes me think I should do the same for other social spyware too. Will give it a try.

[jdaviescoates]

@marcusquinn see also Nitter and similar apps for accessing other platforms.

[jdaviescoates]

@marcusquinn said in 2FA for all LDAP apps:

I deleted the Facebook app a long time ago

I never even installed it as it asked for such a ridiculous number of permissions.

[marcusquinn]

@jdaviescoates Nice. will try. Been looking at https://jarvee.com/ - maybe of interest in a similar API access approach but more for data-mining and marketing.

[mehdi]

@Lonk said in 2FA for all LDAP apps:

amazing how ridiculously insecure things were even 15 years ago.

I think people are going to think the same 15 years from now ^^

[mehdi]

@marcusquinn said in 2FA for all LDAP apps:

I mentioned "coffee machine" on a phone call to a friend, hadn't typed it in anywhere or searched anything. Next time I look at Twitter the first ad is for a Nespresso machine.

I think it's just a coincidence ^^ There is no reason to think ad companies are literally listening to you 24/7 : it's too costly from a computing power standpoint, so not worth it.

What they're doing is "just" knowing everything else about you : who you're talking to, what your looking at online, what are your interests, your age, where you live ... And based on that, they can just guess that you may be interested in coffee machines.

(Which, if you ask me, is even scarier that being listened to ^^)

[marcusquinn]

@mehdi I think more likely the person I was talking to had been searching for coffee machine related recently.

I hear a lot of the claims that you'd be able to see the bandwidth if audio was going to central servers but with the computing power in phones I'm pretty sure they can do the local transcription and just send the data encoded for minimal footprint.

It mostly appears to be contact cross-referencing interests but given that any big ad network could acquire data by proxy from a chain of apps to keep their distance from the actual spyware themselves, I'm just increasingly aware of coincidences.

[fbartels]

@marcusquinn said in 2FA for all LDAP apps:

I hear a lot of the claims that you'd be able to see the bandwidth if audio was going to central servers

You need a ridiculously low amount of bandwidth to transmit proper audio: https://www.wowza.com/blog/opus-codec-the-audio-format-explained

But the discussion has already went off topic enough.

Let's just hope applications will be faster I'm adopting webauthn, than they are at implementing oidc.

[jdaviescoates]

@marcusquinn said in 2FA for all LDAP apps:

@jdaviescoates Interesting, I deleted the Facebook app a long time ago. Makes me think I should do the same for other social spyware too. Will give it a try.

One thing I've started doing is using the browser "install app/ add to homepage" whatever they call it feature for various things like Twitter/ Mastodon/ this and other Forums I use so they kinda sorta work like apps but really I'm just using the browser (but I stay logged in and don't have to install the actual app)

[marcusquinn]

@jdaviescoates Ditto! If you install Firefox Focus, that adds a bit more privacy capability to all other browsers too. (iOS at least)

[jdaviescoates]

@marcusquinn nice, I might give that a spin. I've actually got uBlock Origin and Privacy Badger addons installed on my Firefox Android... but now I'm wondering if they get used/ included in app instances... hope/ guess so!

I've recently tried out Bromite (a privacy focused fork of Chromium) after someone mentioned when I tweeted about an annoyance with using Mastodon using Firefox on Andriod (with long toots it's impossible to reply because you can't get down to the Toot button)... I quite like it but even though it's using uBlock and other filters it doesn't seem to actually block as much as Firefox + uBlock (possible because Bromite doesn't support CSS filter, I think).

Have you looked into good open source source Chromium forks before? Ideally ones that block ads. I find Twitter works better in Chromium based browsers on Android than on Firefox, but I can't stand seeing ads and I don't see them on Firefox with uBlock...