Has anyone used v10.1.0?

[girish]

@portfield-slash I have replied in the issue there. Let me see if I can reproduce this.

[portfield-slash]

@girish
Thank you for confirming the issue!

It seems that the format of REDASH_REDIS_URL is different.
Is it possible to confirm?

[girish]

@portfield-slash can you re-install redash and try again? I just pushed a new package which should sort out the redis issue.

[portfield-slash]

@girish
Thank you for your prompt response!
I will confirm it immediately.

[girish]

@portfield-slash yes, please. it's important to re-install and not update. Cloudron does not have code to update the redis provisioning from password to no-password.

[portfield-slash]

@girish
I checked it immediately, but it doesn't seem to work.

I have updated the details in Issue, so can you check it?

[girish]

@portfield-slash it looks like you tried to update your existing instance? Did you install a new instance of redash? The update won't work.

[portfield-slash]

@girish
After uninstalling with Cloudron's GUI, I also installed with GUI.
I have Cloudron installed on AWS EC2. Do I need to rebuild EC2?

[robi]

@portfield-slash no, the app reinstall should do so it pulls in the new base image.

[portfield-slash]

@robi
Thank you for your reply.

The Docker container was recreated, so it doesn't seem to be a problem.

[girish]

@portfield-slash no need to rebuild EC2/server. Are you able to reproduce this on our test server - https://my.demo.cloudron.io (username: cloudron password: cloudron) ?

[ChristopherMag]

@girish When I try to create an instance of Redash on that demo cloudron instance it gets stuck in a starting state and never progresses past that and I can see in the log that the workers keep restarting:

Not sure this is related to the problem at hand as I don't have this issue when install Redash on my own instance of cloudron.

[girish]

@christophermag indeed, I can see that as well. It looks like there is some difference between the Cloudron versions. I am installing on latest dev where it seems to work fine but not on the stable release (7.0.4) which the demo and you guys are on. I will test on 7.0.4.

[kallados]

@girish Yes, my fresh installation on 7.04 also don't work.

[portfield-slash]

I think WORKER TIMEOUT is a gunicorn error.

Add the --timeout parameter in the gunicorn settings and
Avoided the timeout by reloading the supervisor inside the container.

I don't think it is recommended to change the settings in the container, so I think it is necessary to deal with it as a separate matter.

/etc/supervisor/conf.d/redash.conf

[program:web]
directory=/app/code/redash
command=/app/code/redash/bin/run gunicorn -b 0.0.0.0:5000 --name redash -w 4 --max-requests 1000 --timeout 300 redash.wsgi:app
process_name=server
user=cloudron
numprocs=1
autostart=true
autorestart=true

stdout_logfile=/dev/stdout
stdout_logfile_maxbytes=0
stderr_logfile=/dev/stderr
stderr_logfile_maxbytes=0

run sudo supervisorctl reload command.

[girish]

@ChristopherMag @portfield-slash I get the WORKER TIMEOUT error as well.

13:51:16 - [2022-01-11 21:51:16 +0000] [46] [CRITICAL] WORKER TIMEOUT (pid:64)

It seems this is because the queries queue is not processed at all. Per https://github.com/getredash/redash/blob/d8d7c78992e44a4b6d7fdd4c39ccc1c35cd8c7a9/redash/worker.py#L20 , they are many named queues . The Cloudron package only processes "periodic emails default" queues. I am struggling to find any docs or deployment code in redash that will help understand what the correct fix is.

[girish]

Making some progress here:

• https://github.com/getredash/redash/issues/5625
• https://github.com/getredash/redash/issues/5620
• https://discuss.redash.io/t/query-auto-update-does-not-work-redash-v10/9353

The issue is that we don't even process scheduled_queries because of pacakge mis-configuration. What the fix is, I am investigating.

[girish]

@ChristopherMag @portfield-slash I have pushed an update, can you please check? Atleast, I am now able to query sqlite files just fine. Also, seeing all the queued jobs being processed. The new package version is 4.0.0-1 (so, it has the same changelog as 4.0.0, in case you get confused)

[portfield-slash]

@girish
Thank you for your support. I will confirm.

[portfield-slash]

@girish

It was confirmed that the connection test was successful.
I have also confirmed that I can execute queries.

Thank you for your support.

If necessary, I will report on github that the event has been resolved.