Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Discuss
  3. Standard package formats

Standard package formats

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Discuss
7 Posts 4 Posters 977 Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • bmannB Offline
    bmannB Offline
    bmann
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Has there been discussion about adopting a packaging format standard rather than a Cloudron specific one?

    The one that’s probably closest is the Cloud Native Buildpacks from CNCF https://buildpacks.io/

    Why? It means a wider universe of apps that could be ready to go. More information and education on the format.

    scookeS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • robiR Offline
      robiR Offline
      robi
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Perhaps you need to see the BayLISA talks about the origins and architecture of Cloudron.

      Conscious tech

      jdaviescoatesJ 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • robiR robi

        Perhaps you need to see the BayLISA talks about the origins and architecture of Cloudron.

        jdaviescoatesJ Offline
        jdaviescoatesJ Offline
        jdaviescoates
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @robi said in Standard package formats:

        Perhaps you need to see the BayLISA talks about the origins and architecture of Cloudron.

        See https://videos.cloudron.io/w/51jcnUxgd2JetwQ2XAeyWM

        I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

        bmannB 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • bmannB bmann

          Has there been discussion about adopting a packaging format standard rather than a Cloudron specific one?

          The one that’s probably closest is the Cloud Native Buildpacks from CNCF https://buildpacks.io/

          Why? It means a wider universe of apps that could be ready to go. More information and education on the format.

          scookeS Offline
          scookeS Offline
          scooke
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @bmann said in Standard package formats:

          https://buildpacks.io/

          The website says that buildpacks has "been adopted by Cloud Foundry and other PaaS such as Google App Engine, Gitlab, Knative, Deis, Dokku, and Drie." Do I take this to mean that I can take any apps's buildpack, say from Heroku (or from any of those listed), and just run it in any of those mentioned companies, and it will just work? If so, that is impressive and very useful. But I also have doubts that it is actually that transferable- surely there is some tweaking of options or env details needed? And if so, then I wouldn't apply the label "standard" to it.

          A life lived in fear is a life half-lived

          bmannB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • scookeS scooke

            @bmann said in Standard package formats:

            https://buildpacks.io/

            The website says that buildpacks has "been adopted by Cloud Foundry and other PaaS such as Google App Engine, Gitlab, Knative, Deis, Dokku, and Drie." Do I take this to mean that I can take any apps's buildpack, say from Heroku (or from any of those listed), and just run it in any of those mentioned companies, and it will just work? If so, that is impressive and very useful. But I also have doubts that it is actually that transferable- surely there is some tweaking of options or env details needed? And if so, then I wouldn't apply the label "standard" to it.

            bmannB Offline
            bmannB Offline
            bmann
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @scooke said in Standard package formats:

            Do I take this to mean that I can take any apps's buildpack, say from Heroku (or from any of those listed), and just run it in any of those mentioned companies, and it will just work?

            Yes. There is a growing list of platforms that support Buildpacks. There are some related efforts like nixpacks growing as well.

            eg. here's Digital Ocean list of buildpacks they support https://docs.digitalocean.com/products/app-platform/reference/buildpacks/

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • jdaviescoatesJ jdaviescoates

              @robi said in Standard package formats:

              Perhaps you need to see the BayLISA talks about the origins and architecture of Cloudron.

              See https://videos.cloudron.io/w/51jcnUxgd2JetwQ2XAeyWM

              bmannB Offline
              bmannB Offline
              bmann
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @jdaviescoates @robi thanks! Here's the presentation https://assets.cloudron.io/presentations/baylisa-august-2019.pdf for others not clicking through / wanting a written version.

              For context: I've been running and creating Heroku buildpacks since they launched 10+ years ago, precisely because buildpacks are simpler than Docker and make things easier for mortals to self host 🙂

              Now, thinking about a broader "app store", and more hands maintaining common apps, I'm wondering about connecting with other communities to make lighter maintenance work.

              Effectively: what is the difference between some-form-of-buildpacks and Cloudron's current packaging format?

              robiR 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • bmannB bmann

                @jdaviescoates @robi thanks! Here's the presentation https://assets.cloudron.io/presentations/baylisa-august-2019.pdf for others not clicking through / wanting a written version.

                For context: I've been running and creating Heroku buildpacks since they launched 10+ years ago, precisely because buildpacks are simpler than Docker and make things easier for mortals to self host 🙂

                Now, thinking about a broader "app store", and more hands maintaining common apps, I'm wondering about connecting with other communities to make lighter maintenance work.

                Effectively: what is the difference between some-form-of-buildpacks and Cloudron's current packaging format?

                robiR Offline
                robiR Offline
                robi
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @bmann said in Standard package formats:

                Effectively: what is the difference between some-form-of-buildpacks and Cloudron's current packaging format?

                Good question. You should find the information you need in https://docs.cloudron.io/packaging/manifest/

                Conscious tech

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Bookmarks
                • Search