Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Navigation

    Cloudron Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular

    SOLVED Bitwarden - Self-hosted password manager

    App Wishlist
    20
    218
    5981
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • iamthefij
      iamthefij App Dev @yusf last edited by

      @yusf Yea, the Readme describe the reasoning.

      There is no way to actually do true SSO without breaking the model for Bitwarden. The only thing that we can do is automatically invite users to sign up.

      The Bitwarden_rs project doesn't have a way to invite without sending an email as when an SMTP server is configured, it will generate unique invite links for each user.

      If you disable SSO, you only disable the auto-invite feature. You will then need to invite yourself via the Admin panel (admin token is echoed in the logs and in /app/data/admin_token). You can then invite anyone else you wish manually.

      W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
      • necrevistonnezr
        necrevistonnezr last edited by

        Is there a reliable way to move from Bitwarden SQLite (fbartels build) to Bitwarden MySQL (iamthefij build) including all attachments?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • W
          will @girish last edited by will

          This post is deleted!
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • W
            will @iamthefij last edited by

            @iamthefij I can't login to the admin page. It keeps saying "invalid token"
            I did a fresh boot of the container, copied everything between access token= and HTTP/1.1"
            access_token= copied this giberish HTTP/1.1"

            Thoughts?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • nebulon
              nebulon Staff last edited by

              Just to inform everyone here, today I've created a new gitlab project for this app package repo wise, based on @iamthefij version, however without relying on external dockerimages being mounted during app image building. The repo is at https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/bitwardenrs

              One thing I wanted to ask here is, how to deal with ldap sync. Generally this works currently by a cron job running every now and then, checking availalbe users on ldap and then will invite all users, which are not yet invited to the app instance. This has the current annoying thing, where if an admin wants to first try bitwarden on the Cloudron and does not restrict access during installation, the app will send out invites to all users. Since this is the default flow, I don't want to publish the app package like that. On the other hand I do see value in those invites being sent out at the point where the admin decides this app is good to be used.
              To not delay any package release further, we could avoid this topic by packaging it first without ldap, but I wanted to collect some feedback on this here in the thread first. It would be great if you all could share your ideal flow regarding this and maybe explain the use-cases briefly.

              Thanks! And even more thanks to @iamthefij for all the work done on the package already! 😄

              W iamthefij d19dotca 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 5
              • W
                will @nebulon last edited by

                @nebulon My view is if it does not have "full" ldap, ldap should be taken out and left up to the admin to manage by hand, such as it is with other apps, like Ghost, or Monica.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                • iamthefij
                  iamthefij App Dev @nebulon last edited by

                  @nebulon yea, the best for Cloudron would be a way to silently invite so only ldap users could sign up. Maybe I’ll make that suggestion over at the main project.

                  I feel that would make a much better experience for users and admins here.

                  What I did was install it scoped to only my user and then expanded the users to a group later.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • d19dotca
                    d19dotca @nebulon last edited by

                    @nebulon I'm not certain why this app would be unique in that when it's setup it just immediately sends out invites to everyone possible. Seems very strange to have it work that way.

                    Not sure if it's possible, but I think my ideal vision of it is that when we select an LDAP group for authentication, it will allow those users access / send an invite once they attempt the first login from an allowed group, but otherwise it would not auto-invite anybody.

                    And if that can't be done then I'd prefer it just be a manual invite or even "app managed" instead like Invoice Ninja or something where you don't need to have LDAP be the authenticator for the app and can manage it fully inside the app itself instead.

                    Hopefully I didn't misunderstand the situation and question. 👼 haha

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • nebulon
                      nebulon Staff last edited by

                      @d19dotca yes that would be nice to only send invites upon user login attempt, or even better to not send invites but just allow users in that LDAP group to signup normally. However currently this is not possible with the upstream app. So my suggestion is to polish the app package now without any LDAP, since it is confusing currently and just get it pulished. We can always add LDAP once the flow is more obvious and straightforwards.

                      d19dotca 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                      • d19dotca
                        d19dotca @nebulon last edited by

                        @nebulon Ah okay, didn’t realize it was an app limitation rather than a packaging limitation. In that case then I would definitely prefer it be pushed without LDAP support (so app-managed) and we can add LDAP support at a later time when the app will allow a better workflow.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • nebulon
                          nebulon Staff last edited by

                          I will lock this thread as we have published the initial app package now: https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/2372/bitwarden_rs

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • First post
                            Last post