Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. App Wishlist
  3. Ente

Ente

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved App Wishlist
65 Posts 23 Posters 12.1k Views 24 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • andreasduerenA andreasdueren

    @robi no pressure, huh 🥸

    robiR Offline
    robiR Offline
    robi
    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    @andreasdueren Hehe. just a gentle reminder of a previous completion attempt 😉

    Conscious tech

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      Nerdrelaxo
      wrote on last edited by
      #48

      Would love to see it soon in the Cloudron App Store!

      sponchS 1 Reply Last reply
      5
      • N Nerdrelaxo

        Would love to see it soon in the Cloudron App Store!

        sponchS Offline
        sponchS Offline
        sponch
        wrote on last edited by sponch
        #49

        @Nerdrelaxo same:)
        Mobile App lot of faster than Immich, E2EE

        andreasduerenA 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • sponchS sponch

          @Nerdrelaxo same:)
          Mobile App lot of faster than Immich, E2EE

          andreasduerenA Offline
          andreasduerenA Offline
          andreasdueren
          wrote on last edited by
          #50

          @sponch Yes me too, but I've been struggling with this packaging but also I'm a bit discouraged because I've packaged two apps now but I'm not sure if they'll make it to the app store at all. I udnerstand maintaining apps brings additional overhead but trying to get packages working is an investment I'm not sure I want to make if I don't know if it will actually make it to the store.

          timconsidineT 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • andreasduerenA andreasdueren

            @sponch Yes me too, but I've been struggling with this packaging but also I'm a bit discouraged because I've packaged two apps now but I'm not sure if they'll make it to the app store at all. I udnerstand maintaining apps brings additional overhead but trying to get packages working is an investment I'm not sure I want to make if I don't know if it will actually make it to the store.

            timconsidineT Offline
            timconsidineT Offline
            timconsidine
            App Dev
            wrote on last edited by
            #51

            @andreasdueren this is a continuing issue, the need for easy deployment for custom apps via the App Store, if necessary as unsupported apps.

            Big picture view : however hard they try, and even with a bigger team, [@]staff will never be able to keep up with the flow of new software and demand from users for X or Y or very niche Z.

            But there are many users who need an AppStore UI/process to install custom apps., rather than manual build and install.
            We already have "unstable" as a status.
            It would help greatly if there was also "unsupported", requiring only a basic initial review and no ongoing official support or maintenance.
            AppDev and less techie users could be more free to explore/extend without creating a burden for Cloudron ops.

            necrevistonnezrN 1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • timconsidineT timconsidine

              @andreasdueren this is a continuing issue, the need for easy deployment for custom apps via the App Store, if necessary as unsupported apps.

              Big picture view : however hard they try, and even with a bigger team, [@]staff will never be able to keep up with the flow of new software and demand from users for X or Y or very niche Z.

              But there are many users who need an AppStore UI/process to install custom apps., rather than manual build and install.
              We already have "unstable" as a status.
              It would help greatly if there was also "unsupported", requiring only a basic initial review and no ongoing official support or maintenance.
              AppDev and less techie users could be more free to explore/extend without creating a burden for Cloudron ops.

              necrevistonnezrN Online
              necrevistonnezrN Online
              necrevistonnezr
              wrote on last edited by
              #52

              @timconsidine … but then you get very close to Yunohost and the like that have tons of broken packages…

              scookeS timconsidineT 2 Replies Last reply
              4
              • necrevistonnezrN necrevistonnezr

                @timconsidine … but then you get very close to Yunohost and the like that have tons of broken packages…

                scookeS Online
                scookeS Online
                scooke
                wrote on last edited by
                #53

                @necrevistonnezr TRUE. This renders the entire effort suspect. I don't bother using YH anymore, not even to try things out. It'd be a shame if that happens to Cloudron.

                A life lived in fear is a life half-lived

                timconsidineT 1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • necrevistonnezrN necrevistonnezr

                  @timconsidine … but then you get very close to Yunohost and the like that have tons of broken packages…

                  timconsidineT Offline
                  timconsidineT Offline
                  timconsidine
                  App Dev
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #54

                  @necrevistonnezr yes, a risk that must be guarded against

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • scookeS scooke

                    @necrevistonnezr TRUE. This renders the entire effort suspect. I don't bother using YH anymore, not even to try things out. It'd be a shame if that happens to Cloudron.

                    timconsidineT Offline
                    timconsidineT Offline
                    timconsidine
                    App Dev
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #55

                    @scooke yep. I never look at YH these days.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • andreasduerenA Offline
                      andreasduerenA Offline
                      andreasdueren
                      wrote on last edited by andreasdueren
                      #56

                      The current state of the package:

                      • building from source not using the official docker image
                      • photos works (finally)
                      • other apps (cast/auth/accounts) do not yet
                      • working on a script that will send the OTP via E-Mail instead of having to retrieve from the logs
                      • my s3 configuration is still hardcoded because making it work was a pain
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • nebulonN Offline
                        nebulonN Offline
                        nebulon
                        Staff
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #57

                        Oh very nice progress! So ente also has a requirement for an S3 storage without a fallback to the filesystem?

                        andreasduerenA jdaviescoatesJ 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • nebulonN nebulon

                          Oh very nice progress! So ente also has a requirement for an S3 storage without a fallback to the filesystem?

                          andreasduerenA Offline
                          andreasduerenA Offline
                          andreasdueren
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #58

                          @nebulon correct, ente does not support any other storage options besides s3

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • nebulonN nebulon

                            Oh very nice progress! So ente also has a requirement for an S3 storage without a fallback to the filesystem?

                            jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                            jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                            jdaviescoates
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #59

                            @nebulon said in Ente:

                            Oh very nice progress! So ente also has a requirement for an S3 storage without a fallback to the filesystem?

                            Given this seems (annoyingly) increasingly common, perhaps there needs to be a way for Cloudron users to add details of/ configure their preferred S3 storage option to Cloudron which could then be automagically used like an addon for all such apps?

                            If that is even possible? I guess something like (or even an extension of) Volumes for for S3? 🤷

                            I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • robiR Offline
                              robiR Offline
                              robi
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #60

                              Sounds like bundling headless rustS3 would help.

                              Not sure how Cloudron 9 can handle installing an app w/o another app present, having to check prerequisites.

                              Easy option is to just include an S3 service like PG integrated into the Cloudron base install. It's common enough now it makes sense.

                              Conscious tech

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • andreasduerenA Offline
                                andreasduerenA Offline
                                andreasdueren
                                wrote last edited by andreasdueren
                                #61

                                I got photos and auth working. What still needs to be done:

                                • Make CLI work to increase storage quota
                                • Set up OTT to be sent via E-Mail
                                • Implement option to use multiple s3 backends for redundancy
                                • Check Accounts app
                                sponchS 1 Reply Last reply
                                10
                                • andreasduerenA andreasdueren

                                  I got photos and auth working. What still needs to be done:

                                  • Make CLI work to increase storage quota
                                  • Set up OTT to be sent via E-Mail
                                  • Implement option to use multiple s3 backends for redundancy
                                  • Check Accounts app
                                  sponchS Offline
                                  sponchS Offline
                                  sponch
                                  wrote last edited by sponch
                                  #62

                                  @andreasdueren 👏 hope this will make it to cloudron.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • andreasduerenA Offline
                                    andreasduerenA Offline
                                    andreasdueren
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #63

                                    I'm hitting a road block with this package. @girish any advice?

                                    Go's smtp.PlainAuth (used by Museum) refuses to send credentials (the TOTP) over unencrypted connections for security. Cloudron's sendmail on port 2525 requires authentication but is unencrypted, causing the error: "unencrypted connection".

                                    What I Tried:

                                    1: Port 2525 without auth → 550 "cannot deliver mail" (requires auth)
                                    2: Port 2525 with auth → "unencrypted connection" (PlainAuth rejects)
                                    3: Port 2587 with STARTTLS → Certificate validation fails (x509: certificate is valid for *.tld.com, not mail)
                                    4: Port 2465 with TLS → Same certificate issue

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • girishG Offline
                                      girishG Offline
                                      girish
                                      Staff
                                      wrote last edited by girish
                                      #64

                                      @andreasdueren oh this is a general problem with Go apps which don't want to send email to servers without valid TLS certificates . You can set requiresValidCertificate as an option for sendmail addon in the manifest . See the fider and pocketbase packages which use this. Currently, this flag needs Cloudron 9.

                                      andreasduerenA 1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • girishG girish

                                        @andreasdueren oh this is a general problem with Go apps which don't want to send email to servers without valid TLS certificates . You can set requiresValidCertificate as an option for sendmail addon in the manifest . See the fider and pocketbase packages which use this. Currently, this flag needs Cloudron 9.

                                        andreasduerenA Offline
                                        andreasduerenA Offline
                                        andreasdueren
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #65

                                        @girish thanks I'll try that out

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • Bookmarks
                                        • Search