Cachet - status page system

[marcusquinn]

Just noticed that Vivaldi Browser services use CachetHQ for their status page:

• https://vivaldistatus.com/

Not found anything that compares to Updown.io yet but CachetHQ looks decent and the demo shows more features like explaining incidents:

• https://demo.cachethq.io/

The thing I don't like about StatPing is the red blocks for a whole day when you might have had a 1 minute outage.

[robi]

I just wish there was a dark mode and a reliable way to configure statping w/o breaking it every time.

[jarland]

+1 to this app addition. Would even donate to see it added. Cloudron saves me so much time and money, I need a good status page like that on it.

[girish]

I think it's not actively maintained anymore - https://github.com/CachetHQ/Cachet/issues/4326

[jdaviescoates]

@jarland said in Cachet - status page system:

I need a good status page

Uptime Kuma does the job nicely imho.

[marcusquinn]

@jdaviescoates It's the incident communication element that makes Cachet more suitable for business.

[jdaviescoates]

@marcusquinn said in Cachet - status page system:

@jdaviescoates It's the incident communication element that makes Cachet more suitable for business.

Thanks, I'm not sure exactly what that is (?), but is it much different from all the notifications Uptime Kuma supports?

See https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues/284

[marcusquinn]

@jdaviescoates This. Generally considered good courtesy for a company to be transparent about issues and responses, and a legal obligation under GDPR to log any potential breach incidents, with advice on who might be affected, what is being done, and how those affected my protect themselves best from any incident.

[jdaviescoates]

@marcusquinn aha, gotcha, nice.

[girish]

@cypris75 said in Cachet - status page system:

This would make me sign up to Cloudron

If you are around, there is hope! Cachet is back and they made a new release - https://github.com/cachethq/cachet/releases/tag/v2.4.0 .

Also, discussion for 3.x at https://github.com/orgs/cachethq/discussions

[marcusquinn]

@girish Nice! It does look like the most business-like of the bunch.

[d19dotca]

Any ETA @girish on when Cachet may be packaged for use? Not thrilled with Uptime Kuma so if Cachet is back in action, I’d absolutely love to see that be available for Cloudron users. I’m so happy to see it being updated again.

[girish]

I posted at https://github.com/orgs/cachethq/discussions/4350 to find out more about the 2.x branch. Also, it will most likely be incompatible with 3.x. afaict, 2.x also only supports ppg 7.1 which is already EOL.

[CRBear]

Is there any news on this topic? It would be great if "Cachet" could be available on Cloudron. Thank you very much.

[girish]

@CRBear https://github.com/cachethq/cachet/tree/3.x is still under development . We won't package cachet 2.x because we want to make sure the package is maintained before putting in effort.

[fisi]

Is there a current status? Cachet is also deployed as a Container:
https://github.com/cachethq/Docker

[joseph]

@fisi https://github.com/orgs/cachethq/discussions/4342 . Expected to arrive end of this year.

[fisi]

@joseph Version 3.X is now available

[jdaviescoates]

@fisi said in Cachet - status page system:

@joseph Version 3.X is now available

Is it? Where?

It's not showing up in releases and the most recent post by the author in the 3.X announcement thread, posted on 2 Jan 2025 says:

We're working hard on v3 though and we expect something by the end of the year.

So I'm pretty sure 3.X is not available yet and it sounds like it won't be for some time.

[fisi]

@jdaviescoates
https://docs.cachethq.io/v3.x/installation