Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Offical apps | Community apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Community Packages
  3. Hermes Agent

Hermes Agent

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Community Packages
30 Posts 10 Posters 2.5k Views 10 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M
    M
    msbt
    App Dev
    wrote last edited by
    #18

    @andreasdueren do you have plans or even already tried adding something like https://hermes-workspace.com/ to the package?

    Happy Hosting & Web Development

    andreasduerenA 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    • M msbt

      @andreasdueren do you have plans or even already tried adding something like https://hermes-workspace.com/ to the package?

      andreasduerenA
      andreasduerenA
      andreasdueren
      App Dev
      wrote last edited by
      #19

      @msbt I’ll look into it

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • M msbt

        @andreasdueren do you have plans or even already tried adding something like https://hermes-workspace.com/ to the package?

        andreasduerenA
        andreasduerenA
        andreasdueren
        App Dev
        wrote last edited by
        #20

        @msbt this looks like a community package and probably should not be included on the Hermes package. Adds extra complexity, package churn and attack surface.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • M
          M
          msbt
          App Dev
          wrote last edited by
          #21

          @andreasdueren aye, thanks for checking it out!

          Happy Hosting & Web Development

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • A
            A
            alpheus
            wrote last edited by
            #22

            @andreasdueren hello Andreas!
            I have an issue with setting the HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS for scheduled cron jobs. Scheduled cron does phone number extraction and reports it to telegram, but the phone numbers arrive redacted (+49*****1234). If I create a one-off cron and then execute it via hermes cron ... then the redaction doesn't happen (phone numbers are visible).

            I think the issue is that the main gateway process doesn't pick up the value that I wrote in the .env file (false), which results in phone numbers being redacted when they are outputted to telegram.
            If you want to go into the issue with much more depth, below is the detailed summary from my agent of all the things we tried and all the findings that might be useful.

            This happened on HermesAgent app version 0.4.61, but I would guess that the issue still persists.
            Thank you for your time and dedication to the project maintenance!

            Agent summary

            Short version
            python -m gateway.run imports agent.redact before gateway.run loads ~/.hermes/.env, so HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS=false arrives too late for its import-time snapshot.
            Fixing that alone won't solve it though: the gateway's final outbound delivery call forces redaction regardless, and scheduled cron output passes through both scheduler and gateway redaction layers.

            Root causes identified

            • agent/redact.py snapshots HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS at import time (_REDACT_ENABLED = os.getenv(...)), so it must be set before agent.redact is imported.
            • The Cloudron supervisor's environment= list for hermes-gateway includes HERMES_HOME etc., but not HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS/HERMES_REDACT_PHONES.
            • gateway/run.py imports agent modules (which import agent.redact) near the top, but only calls load_hermes_dotenv() much later (~line 1829) — so the .env loads after the snapshot is taken.
            • gateway/run.py::_redact_gateway_user_facing_secrets() calls redact_sensitive_text(text, force=True) — this bypasses _REDACT_ENABLED entirely, so security.redact_secrets: false in config.yaml has no effect on this path.
            • The phone regex also misses Serbian local format and international numbers with a space after the country code.
            • cron/scheduler.py redacts no_agent stdout/stderr independently, then the gateway applies its own forced pass — so scheduled jobs go through two redaction layers.

            What we tried

            • We tested: security.redact_secrets: false in config.yaml
            • HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS=false in .env
            • editing supervisord's environment directly (not durable — file is app-owned and replaced on updates)
            • a sitecustomize.py early-patch (confirmed _REDACT_ENABLED=False standalone, but scheduled Telegram delivery still redacted due to force=True)
            • disabling phone matching + HERMES_REDACT_PHONES=false (still redacted in the real delivery path)
            andreasduerenA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A alpheus

              @andreasdueren hello Andreas!
              I have an issue with setting the HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS for scheduled cron jobs. Scheduled cron does phone number extraction and reports it to telegram, but the phone numbers arrive redacted (+49*****1234). If I create a one-off cron and then execute it via hermes cron ... then the redaction doesn't happen (phone numbers are visible).

              I think the issue is that the main gateway process doesn't pick up the value that I wrote in the .env file (false), which results in phone numbers being redacted when they are outputted to telegram.
              If you want to go into the issue with much more depth, below is the detailed summary from my agent of all the things we tried and all the findings that might be useful.

              This happened on HermesAgent app version 0.4.61, but I would guess that the issue still persists.
              Thank you for your time and dedication to the project maintenance!

              Agent summary

              Short version
              python -m gateway.run imports agent.redact before gateway.run loads ~/.hermes/.env, so HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS=false arrives too late for its import-time snapshot.
              Fixing that alone won't solve it though: the gateway's final outbound delivery call forces redaction regardless, and scheduled cron output passes through both scheduler and gateway redaction layers.

              Root causes identified

              • agent/redact.py snapshots HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS at import time (_REDACT_ENABLED = os.getenv(...)), so it must be set before agent.redact is imported.
              • The Cloudron supervisor's environment= list for hermes-gateway includes HERMES_HOME etc., but not HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS/HERMES_REDACT_PHONES.
              • gateway/run.py imports agent modules (which import agent.redact) near the top, but only calls load_hermes_dotenv() much later (~line 1829) — so the .env loads after the snapshot is taken.
              • gateway/run.py::_redact_gateway_user_facing_secrets() calls redact_sensitive_text(text, force=True) — this bypasses _REDACT_ENABLED entirely, so security.redact_secrets: false in config.yaml has no effect on this path.
              • The phone regex also misses Serbian local format and international numbers with a space after the country code.
              • cron/scheduler.py redacts no_agent stdout/stderr independently, then the gateway applies its own forced pass — so scheduled jobs go through two redaction layers.

              What we tried

              • We tested: security.redact_secrets: false in config.yaml
              • HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS=false in .env
              • editing supervisord's environment directly (not durable — file is app-owned and replaced on updates)
              • a sitecustomize.py early-patch (confirmed _REDACT_ENABLED=False standalone, but scheduled Telegram delivery still redacted due to force=True)
              • disabling phone matching + HERMES_REDACT_PHONES=false (still redacted in the real delivery path)
              andreasduerenA
              andreasduerenA
              andreasdueren
              App Dev
              wrote last edited by
              #23

              @alpheus I pushed 0.4.87 which should resolve this

              A 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • WiseMetalheadW
                WiseMetalheadW
                WiseMetalhead
                translator
                wrote last edited by
                #24

                Am I right in thinking that Incoming Email in the Cloudron app settings currently doesn't work? Whenever I try to configure the mailbox, I always get these errors in the logs:

                Sep 02 17:03:52 2026-09-02 14:03:52,991 ERROR hermes_plugins.email_platform.adapter: [Email] SMTP connection failed: STARTTLS extension not supported by server.
                
                Sep 02 17:03:53 2026-09-02 14:03:53,013 WARNING gateway.run: ✗ email failed to connect
                

                And if I send an email to that address, the agent doesn't respond at all.

                Outgoing email works fine, but only if I leave the default settings unchanged after installing the app.

                andreasduerenA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • andreasduerenA andreasdueren

                  @alpheus I pushed 0.4.87 which should resolve this

                  A
                  A
                  alpheus
                  wrote last edited by
                  #25

                  @andreasdueren thank you for the fix! I will update hermes in the next few days to the latest version and let you know if it fixed it! Thanks for the fast effort and update!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • WiseMetalheadW WiseMetalhead

                    Am I right in thinking that Incoming Email in the Cloudron app settings currently doesn't work? Whenever I try to configure the mailbox, I always get these errors in the logs:

                    Sep 02 17:03:52 2026-09-02 14:03:52,991 ERROR hermes_plugins.email_platform.adapter: [Email] SMTP connection failed: STARTTLS extension not supported by server.
                    
                    Sep 02 17:03:53 2026-09-02 14:03:53,013 WARNING gateway.run: ✗ email failed to connect
                    

                    And if I send an email to that address, the agent doesn't respond at all.

                    Outgoing email works fine, but only if I leave the default settings unchanged after installing the app.

                    andreasduerenA
                    andreasduerenA
                    andreasdueren
                    App Dev
                    wrote last edited by
                    #26

                    @WiseMetalhead Please update to 0.4.88. It should work now.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • nostrdevN
                      nostrdevN
                      nostrdev
                      wrote last edited by
                      #27

                      @andreasdueren we were initially tempted to use cloudron for packaging agents but given the many documented cases of AI breaking out of containers, compounded by the amount of unencrypted internal cloudron comms and ports being available, we backed away

                      We are now evaluating firecracker on a dedicated machine for agent hosting

                      Curious what your (and others) position is with regard to the risks of running agents on cloudron containers

                      timconsidineT 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • nostrdevN nostrdev

                        @andreasdueren we were initially tempted to use cloudron for packaging agents but given the many documented cases of AI breaking out of containers, compounded by the amount of unencrypted internal cloudron comms and ports being available, we backed away

                        We are now evaluating firecracker on a dedicated machine for agent hosting

                        Curious what your (and others) position is with regard to the risks of running agents on cloudron containers

                        timconsidineT
                        timconsidineT
                        timconsidine
                        App Dev
                        wrote last edited by timconsidine
                        #28

                        @nostrdev E2B ? Kata ? Something else ?
                        (Probably a slippery slope needing its own discuss or off-topic thread, based on your thought-provoking question touching many surfaces).

                        Indie app dev, huge fan of Cloudron PaaS, scratching my itches : communityapps.appx.uk

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • nostrdevN nostrdev referenced this topic
                        • nostrdevN
                          nostrdevN
                          nostrdev
                          wrote last edited by
                          #29

                          slippery and off-topic indeed - put some iterations into it and made a new topic here. it's a subject that many, if not most, of us are interested in, has probably been well discussed before.

                          https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/15921/running-ai-agents-on-cloudron-infiltrating-other-containers-and-admin-services

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • A
                            A
                            alpheus
                            wrote last edited by alpheus
                            #30

                            @andreasdueren Hi again!
                            I updated to the latest version (0.4.89) and I can confirm that HERMES_REDACT_SECRETS is successfully read from scheduled cron jobs!
                            Thanks for the fix!

                            Now I have a new but similar issue issue with GITHUB_TOKEN - it is present in the .env (agent confirms that in the chat), but it's not being read in the cron.

                            Here is the report from the agent:
                            The cron scheduler runs inside the gateway process. When it spawns the no_agent script, it builds the child env via
                            build_subprocess_env() → _sanitize_subprocess_env()
                            which unconditionally strips GITHUB_TOKEN / GH_TOKEN (they're in _ALWAYS_STRIP_KEYS in tools/environments/local.py).

                            The token is present in /app/data/.hermes/.env (line 436, uncommented, len 93) and in my interactive shell, but it never reaches the cron script's subprocess. This is a design conflict: the backup runner needs the token, but Hermes' secret-scrub policy deliberately removes it from child processes. GITHUB_TOKEN is not registered in config.yaml terminal.env_passthrough, so the scrub isn't bypassed.

                            Proposed fix (from our side, not yours)
                            A small wrapper-only code change in our python script that uses github for backup – not a config.yaml change and not a gateway restart.

                            Current flow:

                            cron scheduler (sanitized env; token stripped)
                              → github_backup_publish.py
                                  → run_github_backup.py --publish
                            

                            Proposed flow:

                            cron scheduler (sanitized env)
                            → github_backup_publish.py
                                → read /app/data/.hermes/.env internally
                                → extract only GITHUB_TOKEN
                                → start run_github_backup.py with the existing sanitized env + only GITHUB_TOKEN
                            

                            After I did this workaround, the github token is successfully read.

                            My question for you

                            is this something you could also fix, or I should keep this (or some better) workaround?

                            Thank you once again for your time!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0

                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                            Register Login
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Bookmarks
                            • Search