Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Offical apps | Community apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Support
  3. nginx accepts SHA-224 signature algorithms in TLS 1.2

nginx accepts SHA-224 signature algorithms in TLS 1.2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Support
nginx
3 Posts 2 Posters 39 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • imc67I Online
    imc67I Online
    imc67
    translator
    wrote last edited by girish
    #1

    On Cloudron 9.2.0 (nginx 1.24.0, OpenSSL 3.0.13) the generated vhosts pin ssl_protocols and ship a curated ssl_ciphers list, but the TLS 1.2 signature algorithms are left at OpenSSL's defaults, which still include the SHA-224 variants. A client offering nothing but ECDSA+SHA224 gets a completed handshake with Peer signature type: ecdsa_sha224.

    https://en.internet.nl flags this under "Hash function for key exchange" as phase out, following the NCSC TLS guidelines 2025-05 §3.3.5, and notes it will likely be rated insufficient in a future update. It's the only remaining recommendation on an otherwise 100% site, and it sits in the platform's nginx configuration rather than anywhere an app or admin can reach.

    Since v10 is in the works — would this be worth picking up along the way?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • girishG girish marked this topic as a regular topic
    • girishG Offline
      girishG Offline
      girish
      Staff
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Since we don't set SignatureAlgorithms, the default comes from OpenSSL. It's there even in Ubuntu 26, OpenSSL 3.5.5 (27 Jan 2026).

      It's not a real security issue to have SHA-224 listed since preference is mostly client driven. Most of the modern servers will have SHA-256 (or PSS, never heard of that before I researched this).

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • girishG girish marked this topic as a question
      • girishG girish has marked this topic as solved
      • imc67I Online
        imc67I Online
        imc67
        translator
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Fair enough — you're right that it isn't exploitable. The client sends signature_algorithms and the server picks from the intersection, so nothing modern ends up on SHA-224 unless it explicitly asks for it, which is exactly what my test did.

        Where it still bites is compliance rather than security: organisations measured against the NCSC guidelines get it reported on every scan, and internet.nl states they expect to reclassify it from phase out to insufficient in a future update — at which point it stops being a recommendation and becomes a failed subtest. That's the only thing that really changes the calculus, and whether it's worth pre-empting is your call.

        Same algorithm turns up on the mail server for the same reason, which is in the other thread.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0

        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

        Register Login
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Bookmarks
        • Search