Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. App Wishlist
  3. Docker registry

Docker registry

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved App Wishlist
65 Posts 9 Posters 26.4k Views 12 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • girishG girish

    @mario Fantastic news. So, all we need is docs to make it work with GitLab registry or does it need any packages changes to gitlab app or docker registry app ?

    marioM Offline
    marioM Offline
    mario
    App Dev
    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    @girish doesn't seem like it'll need package changes, documentation will be enough.

    marioM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • marioM mario

      @girish doesn't seem like it'll need package changes, documentation will be enough.

      marioM Offline
      marioM Offline
      mario
      App Dev
      wrote on last edited by mario
      #36

      I take that back, I did add some package changes. Had no time to test, but things seem to be working ok from the initial glimpse at it:

      https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/docker-registry-app/-/merge_requests/1

      Please test and report back @girish and others 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • robiR Offline
        robiR Offline
        robi
        wrote on last edited by
        #37

        Might be useful to add auto deletion of old images:
        https://github.com/jeffstephens/retention-manager

        Conscious tech

        marioM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • robiR robi

          Might be useful to add auto deletion of old images:
          https://github.com/jeffstephens/retention-manager

          marioM Offline
          marioM Offline
          mario
          App Dev
          wrote on last edited by
          #38

          @robi GitLab does that for me 😛 Maybe a separate app? 🙂

          girishG robiR 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • marioM mario

            @robi GitLab does that for me 😛 Maybe a separate app? 🙂

            girishG Offline
            girishG Offline
            girish
            Staff
            wrote on last edited by
            #39

            @mario Just looking into this now.

            Wondering, what is the best way forward. The app has no UI, but can have a login screen (via proxyAuth). So, when they login, they see a blank screen. Not ideal. Does it make sense to bundle any of the docker uis like https://github.com/Joxit/docker-registry-ui/ ? Seems quite easy to do. I can look into it.

            marioM 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • marioM mario

              @robi GitLab does that for me 😛 Maybe a separate app? 🙂

              robiR Offline
              robiR Offline
              robi
              wrote on last edited by
              #40

              @mario that's great, but the standalone private registry app that's coming may need it and as @girish pointed out a simple UI.

              Also not everyone is interested in the ruby laden GitLab and all it's complexity. 🙂

              Conscious tech

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • girishG girish

                @mario Just looking into this now.

                Wondering, what is the best way forward. The app has no UI, but can have a login screen (via proxyAuth). So, when they login, they see a blank screen. Not ideal. Does it make sense to bundle any of the docker uis like https://github.com/Joxit/docker-registry-ui/ ? Seems quite easy to do. I can look into it.

                marioM Offline
                marioM Offline
                mario
                App Dev
                wrote on last edited by
                #41

                @girish depends on what the community needs. I'm more than happy to have a separate registry + other things as separate apps for those who need it.

                If I needed to pick the best registry solution with UI and everything else that's well maintained and suitable for Cloudron, I'd probably look at Quay which supports LDAP auth.

                https://github.com/quay/quay

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • mehdiM Offline
                  mehdiM Offline
                  mehdi
                  App Dev
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #42

                  I am 100% in favor of bundling a simple UI together with the registry. Even if one does not need it and wants to use the gitlab UI, there's basically nothing to lose besides a few kB of storage ^^

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • jimcavoliJ Offline
                    jimcavoliJ Offline
                    jimcavoli
                    App Dev
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #43

                    Yeah, Quay and Harbor are definitely the big players in this space. Very similar products - harbor is CNCF graduated and Quay is upstream for the corresponding Red Hat product. Either (or both) would be good UI adds.

                    marioM 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • girishG Offline
                      girishG Offline
                      girish
                      Staff
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #44

                      Last I checked harbor was impractical to package (as in way too much effort, it's really geared for the k8s crowd). Quay is a good option, but let me get this basic docker registry out first, I am almost there.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • jimcavoliJ jimcavoli

                        Yeah, Quay and Harbor are definitely the big players in this space. Very similar products - harbor is CNCF graduated and Quay is upstream for the corresponding Red Hat product. Either (or both) would be good UI adds.

                        marioM Offline
                        marioM Offline
                        mario
                        App Dev
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #45

                        @jimcavoli Quay afaik implements the protocol as well, so no need for registry separately.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • girishG Offline
                          girishG Offline
                          girish
                          Staff
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #46

                          So strange, I am getting a "invalid checksum digest format" whenever I push now to this registry. Has anyone seen such an error before?

                          The push refers to repository [xxx.xxx.xxx/cloudron/base]
                          fcdfeda3e242: Layer already exists 
                          0ea3bde29271: Layer already exists 
                          d75ccb14b8b6: Layer already exists 
                          74b4389a43ab: Layer already exists 
                          5f38ae1e1a63: Layer already exists 
                          3479c151673d: Layer already exists 
                          7a307b866f25: Layer already exists 
                          ce3a66c20e17: Layer already exists 
                          7197b970ebb9: Layer already exists 
                          16542a8fc3be: Layer already exists 
                          6597da2e2e52: Layer already exists 
                          977183d4e999: Layer already exists 
                          c8be1b8f4d60: Layer already exists 
                          invalid checksum digest format
                          
                          marioM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • girishG girish

                            So strange, I am getting a "invalid checksum digest format" whenever I push now to this registry. Has anyone seen such an error before?

                            The push refers to repository [xxx.xxx.xxx/cloudron/base]
                            fcdfeda3e242: Layer already exists 
                            0ea3bde29271: Layer already exists 
                            d75ccb14b8b6: Layer already exists 
                            74b4389a43ab: Layer already exists 
                            5f38ae1e1a63: Layer already exists 
                            3479c151673d: Layer already exists 
                            7a307b866f25: Layer already exists 
                            ce3a66c20e17: Layer already exists 
                            7197b970ebb9: Layer already exists 
                            16542a8fc3be: Layer already exists 
                            6597da2e2e52: Layer already exists 
                            977183d4e999: Layer already exists 
                            c8be1b8f4d60: Layer already exists 
                            invalid checksum digest format
                            
                            marioM Offline
                            marioM Offline
                            mario
                            App Dev
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #47

                            @girish local filesystem?

                            girishG 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • marioM mario

                              @girish local filesystem?

                              girishG Offline
                              girishG Offline
                              girish
                              Staff
                              wrote on last edited by girish
                              #48

                              @mario Yes, with the local storage. I wonder if it's something to do with the proxy auth. I am trying it without auth now.

                              edit: indeed, something to do with the proxy auth. It works fine without proxy auth. Debugging.

                              mehdiM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • girishG girish

                                @mario Yes, with the local storage. I wonder if it's something to do with the proxy auth. I am trying it without auth now.

                                edit: indeed, something to do with the proxy auth. It works fine without proxy auth. Debugging.

                                mehdiM Offline
                                mehdiM Offline
                                mehdi
                                App Dev
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #49

                                @girish Are you on 6.1 ? Maybe your 2FA implementation broke something with the basic auth ?

                                girishG 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mehdiM mehdi

                                  @girish Are you on 6.1 ? Maybe your 2FA implementation broke something with the basic auth ?

                                  girishG Offline
                                  girishG Offline
                                  girish
                                  Staff
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #50

                                  @mehdi yeah, i had that in mind and tried with 6.0 as well. fails the same. I am pretty sure this worked when I tested it back then, so I must have broke something !

                                  mehdiM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • girishG girish

                                    @mehdi yeah, i had that in mind and tried with 6.0 as well. fails the same. I am pretty sure this worked when I tested it back then, so I must have broke something !

                                    mehdiM Offline
                                    mehdiM Offline
                                    mehdi
                                    App Dev
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #51

                                    @girish You can try with an app-password, or try another Basic Auth ProxyAuth app, like Transmission (with an android app or a browser extension)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • girishG Offline
                                      girishG Offline
                                      girish
                                      Staff
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #52

                                      What I am seeing is that docker doesn't send any authorization header at all. The issue is very similar to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55516317/docker-login-not-passing-basic-authentication-headers-to-nginx . I can curl just fine.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • girishG Offline
                                        girishG Offline
                                        girish
                                        Staff
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #53

                                        It seems that v2 registry auth does not use the basic bearer based authentication at all. https://docs.docker.com/registry/recipes/nginx/ is possibly obsolete, but I am trying to setup a registry from scratch now to double check.

                                        marioM mehdiM 2 Replies Last reply
                                        2
                                        • girishG girish

                                          It seems that v2 registry auth does not use the basic bearer based authentication at all. https://docs.docker.com/registry/recipes/nginx/ is possibly obsolete, but I am trying to setup a registry from scratch now to double check.

                                          marioM Offline
                                          marioM Offline
                                          mario
                                          App Dev
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #54

                                          @girish it definitely can, that's how GitLab etc integration works.

                                          girishG 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Bookmarks
                                          • Search