Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Discuss
  3. Cloudron License

Cloudron License

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Discuss
cloudronlicense
6 Posts 4 Posters 1.5k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LoudLemur
    wrote on last edited by girish
    #1

    In which section of the Cloudron Documentation can we find the licence? Under which licence is Cloudron released? I thought this would be more prominent.

    https://docs.cloudron.io/

    jdaviescoatesJ 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • L LoudLemur

      In which section of the Cloudron Documentation can we find the licence? Under which licence is Cloudron released? I thought this would be more prominent.

      https://docs.cloudron.io/

      jdaviescoatesJ Offline
      jdaviescoatesJ Offline
      jdaviescoates
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @loudlemur it's not open source if that's what you're wondering?

      It was for a while, but isn't anymore, but I've never heard any actual reasoning why not other than they kept getting emails from idiots saying "how can it be open source but not free" and a (imho false) assumption that somehow making it open source would wreck its business model. Maybe it would but I've no heard any actual arguments as to how that would play out. My own view is many people not willing to subscribe to a non-open source service would very happily subscribe to support an open source project (and, well, for updates and support too, just like how Redhat made billions)

      See https://forum.cloudron.io/post/10860

      The licence is here:

      https://www.cloudron.io/legal/license.html

      I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • jdaviescoatesJ jdaviescoates

        @loudlemur it's not open source if that's what you're wondering?

        It was for a while, but isn't anymore, but I've never heard any actual reasoning why not other than they kept getting emails from idiots saying "how can it be open source but not free" and a (imho false) assumption that somehow making it open source would wreck its business model. Maybe it would but I've no heard any actual arguments as to how that would play out. My own view is many people not willing to subscribe to a non-open source service would very happily subscribe to support an open source project (and, well, for updates and support too, just like how Redhat made billions)

        See https://forum.cloudron.io/post/10860

        The licence is here:

        https://www.cloudron.io/legal/license.html

        L Offline
        L Offline
        LoudLemur
        wrote on last edited by LoudLemur
        #3

        @jdaviescoates

        Thanks! Here is a screenshot of the Licence with some salient parts highlighted.

        Cloudron Subscription Licence

        Here are the Terms of Service referenced in the Licence.

        https://www.cloudron.io/legal/terms.html

        I haven't had a chance yet to investigate this, but the first thing I notice is that this is specifically a licence for a subscription to Cloudron.

        The Free Software Foundation (as I am sure people here will know) specify 4 Freedoms required for software to be Free:

        • The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0).
        • The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
        • The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help others (freedom 2).
        • The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

        As a side note, I always thought that the numbering began with 0 because it is the way in computing, however...

        Footnote
        The reason they are numbered 0, 1, 2 and 3 is historical. 
        Around 1990 there were three freedoms, numbered 1, 2 and 3. Then we realized that the freedom to run the program needed to be mentioned explicitly. 
        It was clearly more basic than the other three, so it properly should precede them. 
        Rather than renumber the others, we made it freedom 0.
        
        BrutalBirdieB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L LoudLemur

          @jdaviescoates

          Thanks! Here is a screenshot of the Licence with some salient parts highlighted.

          Cloudron Subscription Licence

          Here are the Terms of Service referenced in the Licence.

          https://www.cloudron.io/legal/terms.html

          I haven't had a chance yet to investigate this, but the first thing I notice is that this is specifically a licence for a subscription to Cloudron.

          The Free Software Foundation (as I am sure people here will know) specify 4 Freedoms required for software to be Free:

          • The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0).
          • The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
          • The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help others (freedom 2).
          • The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

          As a side note, I always thought that the numbering began with 0 because it is the way in computing, however...

          Footnote
          The reason they are numbered 0, 1, 2 and 3 is historical. 
          Around 1990 there were three freedoms, numbered 1, 2 and 3. Then we realized that the freedom to run the program needed to be mentioned explicitly. 
          It was clearly more basic than the other three, so it properly should precede them. 
          Rather than renumber the others, we made it freedom 0.
          
          BrutalBirdieB Offline
          BrutalBirdieB Offline
          BrutalBirdie
          Partner
          wrote on last edited by BrutalBirdie
          #4

          @staff 😉 this needs to be updated

          Like my work? Consider donating a drink. Cheers!

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • girishG Offline
            girishG Offline
            girish
            Staff
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I have fixed the year in the license.

            As for the license itself, the platform code is not opensource or free software if that is what you are wondering. We contribute to opensource in other ways both financially and with development - https://www.cloudron.io/opensource.html . The license text is an adaptation of various other licenses like GitLab EE, Sourcegraph EE license etc.

            All our app packages are opensource. All the code is at https://git.cloudron.io/

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • girishG girish

              I have fixed the year in the license.

              As for the license itself, the platform code is not opensource or free software if that is what you are wondering. We contribute to opensource in other ways both financially and with development - https://www.cloudron.io/opensource.html . The license text is an adaptation of various other licenses like GitLab EE, Sourcegraph EE license etc.

              All our app packages are opensource. All the code is at https://git.cloudron.io/

              L Offline
              L Offline
              LoudLemur
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @girish said in Cloudron Licence:

              I have fixed the year in the license.

              As for the license itself, the platform code is not opensource or free software if that is what you are wondering. We contribute to opensource in other ways both financially and with development - https://www.cloudron.io/opensource.html . The license text is an adaptation of various other licenses like GitLab EE, Sourcegraph EE license etc.

              All our app packages are opensource. All the code is at https://git.cloudron.io/

              I would like Cloudron to be released under a Free Licence. I am sure I am not alone in this.

              I feel uneasy about it being non-Free. It feels like the rug could be pulled out from underneath at any moment. It is not that I think that Cloudron might "turn evil", but that pressure could be brought to bear on the maintainers, and in that way infrastructure built on Cloudron could be cancelled.

              Is there any hope that Cloudron might be re-releaed under a Free licence?

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Bookmarks
              • Search