@dsp76 Sadly not yet. Did not have the time to do so.

@potemkin_ai said in opentalk videoconferencing: I'm sorry, but: You can... Each conference will be launched within a container. That's a quote from OpenTalk's website, I do not invent and propagate hearings lol Sounds like a nice marketing wording for what's happening already for any docker-ized app. Every docker-ized app launch it's context within a container. It's in no way a "marketing wording" it's how they've implemented their app's environment apparently. To run an app built to run from within a docker container, obviously it runs in a container. Though the self-contained apps And I seriously doubt that for every call they deploy separate container and kill it afterwards - especially on Kubernetes, that would make calls setup extremely slow. Well, I get you but this is not my saying, this is what I quoted from their own website so this is their OWN explanation of how their conference server works. If you don't believe them, maybe you should go and argue with them what you know about Docker and Kubernetes? For my part, according to their OWN explanation, it reminds me much of how Cloudron works, somehow...

@osobo out of curiosity what is making you more interested in RosarioSIS vs Gibbon? Is it that it has a moodle plugin? Also do you know if any of these have a student government module of sorts?

Looks like it's a JS/TS & Go app that relies on PostgreSQL. https://docs.cortezaproject.org/corteza-docs/2023.3/devops-guide/index.html#deploy-offline docker deployment https://docs.cortezaproject.org/corteza-docs/2023.9/developer-guide/index.html points to the github monorepo: https://github.com/cortezaproject/corteza Dockerfile there seems straighforward, in case @Kubernetes is interested.

To have a great stack to dev, this would be very nice !

@jdaviescoates No automated reminders and also that it's just a single user instance. ... ADDING FOR CLARITY: Part of the whole benefit of self-hosting an app is that you don't have limitations like you do on a cloud-hosted version, right? Particularly that I don't have pay the absurdly high per-seat licenses of something like DocuSign (which quickly get out of hand if you need, say, 5 people using the app). The tradeoff for self-hosting, in my opinion, is not having the most cutting edge features and all the edge-case features that I rarely use anyway. I really start to question the value add of a self-hosting a DocuSign alternative when I only have one user to work with, though, considering that self-hosting an alternative does require some cost (server, and in this case, the Cloudron license). So to self-host I'm already paying more than two DocuSign licenses and I only have one user to work with. Why not just use DocuSign at that point, so I get all of its features and support?

Licence: GPL v3.0 Docker: Yes Demo: https://demo.evershop.io/

@timconsidine said in Silver Bullet is an extensible, open source, personal knowledge management application.: deployed SilverBullet on another VPS, and it's nice I agree. I also have tested it on another VPS and am in the progress of figuring out the best way to self-host this at home for now. Zef has recently added a page that might be helpful. Deploy Silverbullet and Cloudflare in Portainer https://silverbullet.md/Guide/Deployment/Cloudflare and Portainer

This looks super interesting ! I've found great content using this recently.

@LoudLemur said in Asterisk PBX - Open Source VOIP IP-PBX Server: Jitsi is being used as a back end too, for e.g. Nextcloud Talk, I believe. I don't think so. BTW, I recommended checking out this post by @luckow https://forum.cloudron.io/post/75268 I'm going to try FreePBX like he does on a small dedicated VPS using their custom image. It sounds easy / great!

Curious about this one too. I have a friend that asked for a note taking app that also allow to publish, and this could be it.

The only thing is the first download of all the cve defintions witch is a big amount. Other then that it is webbased and possible to do agentless scanns

@necrevistonnezr I agree it is down to interpretation. But it is a slippery slope. If a restricted-licence package has Docker deployment (hosted on hub.docker.com), is Docker the company in breach of the licence ? The VPS provider ? Ubuntu (as the OS on the the VPS)? Personally I would tend to a more restricted interpretation of who is actually deploying and hosting and making available the package.