Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. App Wishlist
  3. LibreChat

LibreChat

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved App Wishlist
chatgptopenai
41 Posts 13 Posters 4.1k Views 16 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • micmcM micmc

    By reading descriptions here, I detected 2 major differences.

    1. It seems like LibreChat CAN be used with APIs to most the big external LLMs available, which Open WebUI does NOT. It can use only OpenAI's API.
    2. It seems like LibreChat must use APIs to outsider RAG system, while Open WebUI has it's own RAG system integrated.
    3. Yeah, there might be a third one. Open WebUI is geared to use most of the open source LLMs available right now, it even has a huggingface pipeline, it's a great community with available plugins, functions and tasks, while LibreChat does not seem, at first glance, to be geared to use open source LLMs.

    There would be a use for both and since Open WebUI is already on Cloudron, it could be cool to add LibreChat as well. On another note, there's AnythingLLM that has also been suggested. Is there any comparison made to that also amazing LLMs UI? Would be interesting to find out as well before spending time adding a new LLM UI on Cloudron, and thus keep resources to add some other much on demand apps that have been in the waiting for long.

    jdaviescoatesJ Offline
    jdaviescoatesJ Offline
    jdaviescoates
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @micmc said in LibreChat:

    It seems like LibreChat CAN be used with APIs to most the big external LLMs available, which Open WebUI does NOT. It can use only OpenAI's API.

    I've only ever played a little with OpenWebUI on Cloudron and never connected it to any API, but I wondered about this.

    In short, you can connect OpenWebUI to other APIs too via functions or LiteLLM integration (or via their pipelines - although I gather that's even more involved), it's just not as easy as connecting to the OpenAI API, see e.g. https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/3288

    I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

    micmcM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • jdaviescoatesJ jdaviescoates

      @micmc said in LibreChat:

      It seems like LibreChat CAN be used with APIs to most the big external LLMs available, which Open WebUI does NOT. It can use only OpenAI's API.

      I've only ever played a little with OpenWebUI on Cloudron and never connected it to any API, but I wondered about this.

      In short, you can connect OpenWebUI to other APIs too via functions or LiteLLM integration (or via their pipelines - although I gather that's even more involved), it's just not as easy as connecting to the OpenAI API, see e.g. https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/issues/3288

      micmcM Offline
      micmcM Offline
      micmc
      wrote on last edited by micmc
      #23

      @jdaviescoates Yeah, there are many things in development, it's actually pretty heavily developed and updated several times a week, so I've no doubt it'll come to a point where it'll connect to big tech's api as well, sooner that later...

      Ignorance is not an excuse anymore!
      https://AutomateKit.com

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N NCKNE

        I am also confused about how this is different from openwebui where you can create a custom model that is enriched with your own knowledge (aka you own documents) and share that model with other to chat with. I am no expert here though and have just used openwebui so far. Works great.

        marcusquinnM Offline
        marcusquinnM Offline
        marcusquinn
        wrote on last edited by marcusquinn
        #24

        @NCKNE Can you now invite other private users to use your private task-specific knowledge-primed with WebUI?

        From what I have seen:

        If you work alone. I'm sure WebUI is fine.

        If you work as a team. LibreChat has a very, very valuable feature that I've not see existing or planned for WebUI.

        I expect the difficulty in seeing the difference is those that don't work as a team on things, so will never have the need to share what LibreChat calls "agents".

        Those working as a team just don't have a team-tool to collaborate with.

        AI chat requires a ton of refinement for specific purposes.

        If you want basic Q&A AI chat, use anything.

        If you need a specific type and style of output, based on additional knowledge input, and for the output to be consistent across a team, the choices I know of are Poe.com with those fees, or LibreChat hosted on a server.

        Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
        Development https://brandlight.org
        Life https://marcusquinn.com

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • firmansiF firmansi

          Surely quite many differerences between those two products for example in RAG technology, each has difference approach that i can't say which one better because it depends on use case, and furthermore openwebUI and librechat has different approach providing agentAI to perform specific tasks, hopefully Cloudron team will accomodate appwishlist to have Librechat available in Cloudron. Eventhough I see in wishlist, there's also a wish for similar product named AnythingLLM, but i frankly see Librechat AI is better option to accomodate

          marcusquinnM Offline
          marcusquinnM Offline
          marcusquinn
          wrote on last edited by marcusquinn
          #25

          @firmansi Yeah, they might be things "better", and there might be things with WebUI that are "good enough".

          The reason for LibreChat is specifically for collaboration.

          I use Cloudron as a collaboration platform among many users for different things, so I value collaborative tools that save time and repeat conversations or effort.

          LibreChat solves that for me, and it would be nicer to have it self-hosted with Cloudron, than to be setting up a separate small server just for this one app, and then all the maintenance involved in that.

          There's a need, problem, and solution. We don't need to re-invent anything. Just an ability to use each thing for it's unique advantages.

          Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
          Development https://brandlight.org
          Life https://marcusquinn.com

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • micmcM micmc

            By reading descriptions here, I detected 2 major differences.

            1. It seems like LibreChat CAN be used with APIs to most the big external LLMs available, which Open WebUI does NOT. It can use only OpenAI's API.
            2. It seems like LibreChat must use APIs to outsider RAG system, while Open WebUI has it's own RAG system integrated.
            3. Yeah, there might be a third one. Open WebUI is geared to use most of the open source LLMs available right now, it even has a huggingface pipeline, it's a great community with available plugins, functions and tasks, while LibreChat does not seem, at first glance, to be geared to use open source LLMs.

            There would be a use for both and since Open WebUI is already on Cloudron, it could be cool to add LibreChat as well. On another note, there's AnythingLLM that has also been suggested. Is there any comparison made to that also amazing LLMs UI? Would be interesting to find out as well before spending time adding a new LLM UI on Cloudron, and thus keep resources to add some other much on demand apps that have been in the waiting for long.

            marcusquinnM Offline
            marcusquinnM Offline
            marcusquinn
            wrote on last edited by
            #26

            @micmc For me the big thing is teamwork with LibreChat.

            Poe.com is the best comparable I know it.

            Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
            Development https://brandlight.org
            Life https://marcusquinn.com

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N NCKNE

              I am also confused about how this is different from openwebui where you can create a custom model that is enriched with your own knowledge (aka you own documents) and share that model with other to chat with. I am no expert here though and have just used openwebui so far. Works great.

              jdaviescoatesJ Offline
              jdaviescoatesJ Offline
              jdaviescoates
              wrote on last edited by
              #27

              This...

              @marcusquinn said in LibreChat:

              If you need a specific type and style of output, based on additional knowledge input, and for the output to be consistent across a team, the choices I know of are Poe.com with those fees, or LibreChat hosted on a server.

              ...does sound an awful lots like this:

              @NCKNE said in LibreChat:

              you can create a custom model that is enriched with your own knowledge (aka you own documents) and share that model with other to chat with

              I've not tried doing it with either so can't really comment on any differences.

              But I think everyone is agreed that having LibreChat on Cloudron would be nice.

              I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

              marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • jdaviescoatesJ jdaviescoates

                This...

                @marcusquinn said in LibreChat:

                If you need a specific type and style of output, based on additional knowledge input, and for the output to be consistent across a team, the choices I know of are Poe.com with those fees, or LibreChat hosted on a server.

                ...does sound an awful lots like this:

                @NCKNE said in LibreChat:

                you can create a custom model that is enriched with your own knowledge (aka you own documents) and share that model with other to chat with

                I've not tried doing it with either so can't really comment on any differences.

                But I think everyone is agreed that having LibreChat on Cloudron would be nice.

                marcusquinnM Offline
                marcusquinnM Offline
                marcusquinn
                wrote on last edited by marcusquinn
                #28

                @jdaviescoates Yeah. I can see why people look at the basics of it being a chat app, and think they compare.

                There's so many man-hours that are saved with collaborative tools.

                When you setup a collaborative tool on Poe.com, you are locking that entire team into it a subscription to it for life to continue to use.

                If we had the same with LibreChat on Cloudron, all those processes are now owned and self-hosted, with no per-user pricing, to utilise and get value from.

                I don't doubt WebUI is useful, and great it already packaged.

                We just missed out on having the collaborative LibreChat, so I have to make a value case for it, so it's not dismissed as similar enough to not be a priority.

                If collaboration had no value, I can use LibreChat, locally β€” but the ability to share identical, maintained, pre-trained knowledge apps/agents with LibreChat is so damn valuable if you work with a team.

                The biggest overhead with all teamwork is "explaining". Pre-trained LibreChat agents mostly eliminate that explaining and updating everyone overhead, and gives an interface to consistent input/output for all users.

                AI is notoriously inconsistent and lacking in recent or private knowledge.

                LibreChat solves all of this, when hosted on a server for multiple users to share.

                Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
                Development https://brandlight.org
                Life https://marcusquinn.com

                jdaviescoatesJ 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • marcusquinnM marcusquinn

                  @jdaviescoates Yeah. I can see why people look at the basics of it being a chat app, and think they compare.

                  There's so many man-hours that are saved with collaborative tools.

                  When you setup a collaborative tool on Poe.com, you are locking that entire team into it a subscription to it for life to continue to use.

                  If we had the same with LibreChat on Cloudron, all those processes are now owned and self-hosted, with no per-user pricing, to utilise and get value from.

                  I don't doubt WebUI is useful, and great it already packaged.

                  We just missed out on having the collaborative LibreChat, so I have to make a value case for it, so it's not dismissed as similar enough to not be a priority.

                  If collaboration had no value, I can use LibreChat, locally β€” but the ability to share identical, maintained, pre-trained knowledge apps/agents with LibreChat is so damn valuable if you work with a team.

                  The biggest overhead with all teamwork is "explaining". Pre-trained LibreChat agents mostly eliminate that explaining and updating everyone overhead, and gives an interface to consistent input/output for all users.

                  AI is notoriously inconsistent and lacking in recent or private knowledge.

                  LibreChat solves all of this, when hosted on a server for multiple users to share.

                  jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                  jdaviescoatesJ Offline
                  jdaviescoates
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #29

                  @marcusquinn said in LibreChat:

                  the ability to share identical, maintained, pre-trained knowledge apps/agents with LibreChat is so damn valuable if you work with a team.

                  But how is that different to this:

                  @NCKNE said in LibreChat:

                  you can create a custom model that is enriched with your own knowledge (aka you own documents) and share that model with other to chat with.

                  ?

                  The way you keep on insisting that it is totally different and like it's a whole other level of collaborative capability makes me think there must be some difference, but it's not at all clear what that difference is πŸ™‚

                  You normally do a better job at explaining than you seem to be managing this time πŸ™‚

                  Is LibreChat collaborative like multiple people can join the very same chat window and chat at the same time? Like people can co-edit docs with OnlyOffice/ Collabora? 🀷

                  Perhaps some screenshots or even screencasts are in order?

                  Even better, someone package LibreChat and we can all see for ourselves! πŸ˜›

                  I use Cloudron with Gandi & Hetzner

                  marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jdaviescoatesJ jdaviescoates

                    @marcusquinn said in LibreChat:

                    the ability to share identical, maintained, pre-trained knowledge apps/agents with LibreChat is so damn valuable if you work with a team.

                    But how is that different to this:

                    @NCKNE said in LibreChat:

                    you can create a custom model that is enriched with your own knowledge (aka you own documents) and share that model with other to chat with.

                    ?

                    The way you keep on insisting that it is totally different and like it's a whole other level of collaborative capability makes me think there must be some difference, but it's not at all clear what that difference is πŸ™‚

                    You normally do a better job at explaining than you seem to be managing this time πŸ™‚

                    Is LibreChat collaborative like multiple people can join the very same chat window and chat at the same time? Like people can co-edit docs with OnlyOffice/ Collabora? 🀷

                    Perhaps some screenshots or even screencasts are in order?

                    Even better, someone package LibreChat and we can all see for ourselves! πŸ˜›

                    marcusquinnM Offline
                    marcusquinnM Offline
                    marcusquinn
                    wrote on last edited by marcusquinn
                    #30

                    @jdaviescoates Tired, impatient, and time-sensitive. Sorry!

                    If you get anything from me here it is always to save time, our most precious resources, and I have a lot less of it left them most.

                    Doubly impatient when I have to resize screenshots up upload them to this NodeBB setup, but here we are...

                    • https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/agents
                    • https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/agents#sharing-and-permissions

                    It's all there in the docs.

                    This is an "Agent" (what Poe.com calls a "App". You only have to use Poe.com for 30 seconds to get what they are.)

                    Create these, and have a server-hosted (Cloudron-hosted) instance of LibreChat, and now your pre-trained "Agents" (in LibreChat lingo), can be shared.

                    This feature just doesn't exist in OpenWebUI, and I can't see it coming any time soon.

                    The difference to me with having LibreChat on Cloudron is probably $100/month plus compared to doing the same with Poe.com. Plus not having my knowledge training setups locked up in someone else's SaaS.

                    Plus, frickin hours, and hours, and hours of long-hand wasted time teaching a team how to all setup the same pre-trained chat, and keep updating it as it is refined β€” when this is an already a solved problem but LibreChat Agents and sharing those Agents among users on the same server. Not conversations. Agents. AKA Apps in Poe.com language.

                    With the bridge between problem and solution apparently being persuasion that there is a LOT more value to this in LibreChat, and this specific highly valuable time, money and settings-saving thing value is not in OpenWebUI.

                    If you don't work with a team, you probably don't need it.

                    If you work with a team, and are going to be using AI, then this has a lot of value that I'm not seeing anywhere else.

                    That's the use-case and value-proposition.

                    Is there anyone left in this thread that still doesn't get it? πŸ™‚

                    8bc1846d-2a7d-45e7-b36c-3435fba00c3b-image.png

                    991b5b1b-da48-4150-8ad5-200a59dbd8c7-image.png

                    Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
                    Development https://brandlight.org
                    Life https://marcusquinn.com

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      NCKNE
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      I am pretty happy with this in openwebui:


                      But I will take a look at librechat, just had no desire to look for something else so far.

                      marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • marcusquinnM marcusquinn

                        @jdaviescoates Tired, impatient, and time-sensitive. Sorry!

                        If you get anything from me here it is always to save time, our most precious resources, and I have a lot less of it left them most.

                        Doubly impatient when I have to resize screenshots up upload them to this NodeBB setup, but here we are...

                        • https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/agents
                        • https://www.librechat.ai/docs/features/agents#sharing-and-permissions

                        It's all there in the docs.

                        This is an "Agent" (what Poe.com calls a "App". You only have to use Poe.com for 30 seconds to get what they are.)

                        Create these, and have a server-hosted (Cloudron-hosted) instance of LibreChat, and now your pre-trained "Agents" (in LibreChat lingo), can be shared.

                        This feature just doesn't exist in OpenWebUI, and I can't see it coming any time soon.

                        The difference to me with having LibreChat on Cloudron is probably $100/month plus compared to doing the same with Poe.com. Plus not having my knowledge training setups locked up in someone else's SaaS.

                        Plus, frickin hours, and hours, and hours of long-hand wasted time teaching a team how to all setup the same pre-trained chat, and keep updating it as it is refined β€” when this is an already a solved problem but LibreChat Agents and sharing those Agents among users on the same server. Not conversations. Agents. AKA Apps in Poe.com language.

                        With the bridge between problem and solution apparently being persuasion that there is a LOT more value to this in LibreChat, and this specific highly valuable time, money and settings-saving thing value is not in OpenWebUI.

                        If you don't work with a team, you probably don't need it.

                        If you work with a team, and are going to be using AI, then this has a lot of value that I'm not seeing anywhere else.

                        That's the use-case and value-proposition.

                        Is there anyone left in this thread that still doesn't get it? πŸ™‚

                        8bc1846d-2a7d-45e7-b36c-3435fba00c3b-image.png

                        991b5b1b-da48-4150-8ad5-200a59dbd8c7-image.png

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        LoudLemur
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        @marcusquinn said in LibreChat:

                        Doubly impatient when I have to resize screenshots up upload them to this NodeBB setup, but here we are...

                        ShareX with (on Cloudron) Xbackbone are brilliant for screenshotting. If you regularly use screenshots, it is invaluable.

                        marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • N NCKNE

                          I am pretty happy with this in openwebui:


                          But I will take a look at librechat, just had no desire to look for something else so far.

                          marcusquinnM Offline
                          marcusquinnM Offline
                          marcusquinn
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #33

                          @NCKNE Thanks. Not seen that before. I'm not a fan of the WebUI interface, but it it's possible, it is highly valuable! Thanks for the pointer, I'll give it a try.

                          Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
                          Development https://brandlight.org
                          Life https://marcusquinn.com

                          N 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L LoudLemur

                            @marcusquinn said in LibreChat:

                            Doubly impatient when I have to resize screenshots up upload them to this NodeBB setup, but here we are...

                            ShareX with (on Cloudron) Xbackbone are brilliant for screenshotting. If you regularly use screenshots, it is invaluable.

                            marcusquinnM Offline
                            marcusquinnM Offline
                            marcusquinn
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #34

                            @LoudLemur Thanks. I'm using Shottr, and just found the resize x0.5 option, so that seems to work.

                            Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
                            Development https://brandlight.org
                            Life https://marcusquinn.com

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • marcusquinnM marcusquinn

                              @NCKNE Thanks. Not seen that before. I'm not a fan of the WebUI interface, but it it's possible, it is highly valuable! Thanks for the pointer, I'll give it a try.

                              N Offline
                              N Offline
                              NCKNE
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #35

                              @marcusquinn Youβ€˜re welcome. We are using openwebui with RAG (our own documents aka knowledge) for the IT support team. We are using it on cloudron together with the private IONOS AI Hub. Great service if you are serving EU customers.

                              marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
                              3
                              • N NCKNE

                                @marcusquinn Youβ€˜re welcome. We are using openwebui with RAG (our own documents aka knowledge) for the IT support team. We are using it on cloudron together with the private IONOS AI Hub. Great service if you are serving EU customers.

                                marcusquinnM Offline
                                marcusquinnM Offline
                                marcusquinn
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #36

                                @NCKNE V Interesting. Great share. Thanks you!

                                Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
                                Development https://brandlight.org
                                Life https://marcusquinn.com

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • canadaduaneC Offline
                                  canadaduaneC Offline
                                  canadaduane
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #37

                                  Open WebUI has changed their license to a not-strictly-open-source license (by OSI definition):

                                  https://docs.openwebui.com/license/

                                  https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1kg4avg/openwebui_license_change_red_flag/

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  5
                                  • J Online
                                    J Online
                                    joseph
                                    Staff
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #38

                                    @canadaduane thanks for the heads up . https://docs.openwebui.com/license/#open-webui-license-explained has an ELI5 of sorts

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    4
                                    • marcusquinnM marcusquinn referenced this topic on
                                    • C charlesnw referenced this topic on
                                    • G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      go-run-jump
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #39

                                      There’s actually a deeper issue concerning Open WebUI, beyond just the recent switch to a non-OSI license. The sole maintainer’s demand for contributor license agreements (CLAs), along with how he's communicated and managed these changes, creates genuine uncertainty.

                                      Given this scenario, the risk of further license changes becoming problematic for Cloudron users isn't far-fetched. To mitigate this, proactively packaging LibreChat would be strategically smart. It ensures Cloudron users always have immediate access to reliable, fully open-source software, especially if Open WebUI's licensing situation deteriorates further.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      4
                                      • canadaduaneC Offline
                                        canadaduaneC Offline
                                        canadaduane
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #40

                                        We now have a working LibreChat cloudron container set up. See: https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/12850/first-try-app-packaging-librechat-issue-with-postgresql-extention-pgvector/14?_=1749416165430

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        6
                                        • canadaduaneC canadaduane

                                          We now have a working LibreChat cloudron container set up. See: https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/12850/first-try-app-packaging-librechat-issue-with-postgresql-extention-pgvector/14?_=1749416165430

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          LoudLemur
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #41

                                          @canadaduane Well done, and thank you!

                                          Here are the latest features from the current release:

                                          https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/releases/tag/v0.7.8

                                          What's Changed
                                          🏞️ Highlights
                                          New AI Models: Support for GPT-4.1, o4-mini, o3, Gemini 2.5, and Grok 3
                                          UI Refresh: UX, Navigation, Accessibility Improvements & Optimizations
                                          Agent Chain: Sequential mixture-of-agents enabling multiple specialized AIs to collaborate on complex tasks
                                          Mistral OCR for text extraction: from documents and gpt-4o-transcribe for audio transcription
                                          OpenAI Web Search models: for accessing real-time information
                                          Persistent Code Environment: Code Interpreter files can now persist between chat sessions on demand
                                          Cloud Storage: S3 and Azure Blob integration with auto-refreshing URLs for robust file handling
                                          OpenAI Image Tools (GPT-Image-1): for generating and editing images
                                          Special date/time Variables: for prompts and agents that are used dynamically
                                          Automatic balance refill system: and enhanced Redis integration for rate limiting
                                          ✨ New Features
                                          πŸ” feat: Mistral OCR API / Upload Files as Text by @danny-avila in #6274
                                          πŸ€– feat: Support OpenAI Web Search models by @danny-avila in #6313
                                          πŸ”— feat: Agent Chain (Mixture-of-Agents) by @danny-avila in #6374
                                          βŒ› feat: initTimeout for Slow Starting MCP Servers by @perweij in #6383
                                          πŸš€ feat: S3 Integration for File handling and Image uploads by @rubentalstra in #6142
                                          πŸ”’ feat: Enable OpenID Auto-Redirect by @leondape in #6066
                                          πŸš€ feat: Integrate Azure Blob Storage for file handling and image uploads by @rubentalstra in #6153
                                          πŸš€ feat: Add support for custom AWS endpoint in S3 by @rubentalstra in #6431
                                          πŸš€ feat: Add support for LDAP STARTTLS in LDAP authentication by @rubentalstra in #6438
                                          πŸš€ feat: Refactor schema exports and update package version to 0.0.4 by @rubentalstra in #6455
                                          πŸ”Ό feat: Add Auto Submit For URL Query Params by @mjaverto in #6440
                                          πŸ›  feat: Enhance Redis Integration, Rate Limiters & Log Headers by @danny-avila in #6462
                                          πŸ’΅ feat: Add Automatic Balance Refill by @rubentalstra in #6452
                                          πŸ—£οΈ feat: add support for gpt-4o-transcribe models by @berry-13 in #6483
                                          🎨 feat: UI Refresh for Enhanced UX by @berry-13 in #6346
                                          🌍 feat: Add support for Hungarian language localization by @rubentalstra in #6508
                                          πŸš€ feat: Add Gemini 2.5 Token/Context Values, Increase Max Possible Output to 64k by @danny-avila in #6563
                                          πŸš€ feat: Enhance MCP Connections For Multi-User Support by @danny-avila in #6610
                                          πŸš€ feat: Enhance S3 URL Expiry with Refresh; fix: S3 File Deletion by @danny-avila in #6647
                                          πŸš€ feat: enhance UI components and refactor settings by @berry-13 in #6625
                                          πŸ’¬ feat: move TemporaryChat to the Header by @berry-13 in #6646
                                          πŸš€ feat: Use Model Specs + Specific Endpoints, Limit Providers for Agents by @danny-avila in #6650
                                          πŸͺ™ feat: Sync Balance Config on Login by @danny-avila in #6671
                                          πŸ”¦ feat: MCP Support for Non-Agent Endpoints by @danny-avila in #6775
                                          πŸ—ƒοΈ feat: Code Interpreter File Persistence between Sessions by @danny-avila in #6790
                                          πŸ–₯️ feat: Code Interpreter API for Non-Agent Endpoints by @danny-avila in #6803
                                          ⚑ feat: Self-hosted Artifacts Static Bundler URL by @danny-avila in #6827
                                          🐳 feat: Add Jemalloc and UV to Docker Builds by @danny-avila in #6836
                                          πŸ€– feat: GPT-4.1 by @danny-avila in #6880
                                          πŸ‘‹ feat: remove Edge TTS by @berry-13 in #6885
                                          🧭 feat: nav optimization by @berry-13 in #5785
                                          πŸ—ΊοΈ feat: Add Parameter Location Mapping for OpenAPI actions by @peeeteeer in #6858
                                          πŸ€– feat: Support o4-mini and o3 Models by @danny-avila in #6928
                                          🎨 feat: OpenAI Image Tools (GPT-Image-1) by @danny-avila in #7079
                                          πŸ—“οΈ feat: Add Special Variables for Prompts & Agents, Prompt UI Improvements by @danny-avila in #7123
                                          ✨ feat: Enhance form submission for touch screens by @berry-13 in #7198
                                          πŸ” feat: Additional Tavily API Tool Parameters by @glowforge-opensource in #7232
                                          πŸ‹ feat: Add python to Dockerfile for increased MCP compatibility by @technicalpickles in #7270

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          3
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Bookmarks
                                          • Search