Cloudron makes it easy to run web apps like WordPress, Nextcloud, GitLab on your server. Find out more or install now.


Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Bookmarks
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Cloudron Forum

Apps | Demo | Docs | Install
  1. Cloudron Forum
  2. Announcements
  3. What's coming in Cloudron 9.0 (was 8.0)

What's coming in Cloudron 9.0 (was 8.0)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
62 Posts 22 Posters 24.4k Views 28 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • girishG girish

    Yes, so the changes in master have already piled up and we have completed all the database migration related code changes. The database migration is kinda massive because we also have to pretty much test every app on the app store with the latest frameworks and databases. So, far I think we only have freescout which seems to have some issues with PHP 7.4 but we are only half way through our apps 🙂 I remember last time around we did this owncloud and wallabag was holding us back (both related to postgresql upgrade).

    I won't create a separate thread as such for 6.2 because we only see it as an intermediate release for Cloudron 7.

    LonkleL Offline
    LonkleL Offline
    Lonkle
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @girish Gotcha, well, don't forget to add web hook support to the release notes if that milestone ends up being for 7.0! Really excited about web hooks tbh.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • girishG girish

      Yes, so the changes in master have already piled up and we have completed all the database migration related code changes. The database migration is kinda massive because we also have to pretty much test every app on the app store with the latest frameworks and databases. So, far I think we only have freescout which seems to have some issues with PHP 7.4 but we are only half way through our apps 🙂 I remember last time around we did this owncloud and wallabag was holding us back (both related to postgresql upgrade).

      I won't create a separate thread as such for 6.2 because we only see it as an intermediate release for Cloudron 7.

      d19dotcaD Offline
      d19dotcaD Offline
      d19dotca
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      @girish said in What's coming in Cloudron 7.0:

      I won't create a separate thread as such for 6.2 because we only see it as an intermediate release for Cloudron 7.

      Any ETA on when 6.2 will be out, will that start later this week or will it be a while yet? No rush, just curious as I'm trying to plan some of my testing around that Backups behaviour fix for cleaning out missing backups.

      --
      Dustin Dauncey
      www.d19.ca

      girishG 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • d19dotcaD d19dotca

        @girish said in What's coming in Cloudron 7.0:

        I won't create a separate thread as such for 6.2 because we only see it as an intermediate release for Cloudron 7.

        Any ETA on when 6.2 will be out, will that start later this week or will it be a while yet? No rush, just curious as I'm trying to plan some of my testing around that Backups behaviour fix for cleaning out missing backups.

        girishG Offline
        girishG Offline
        girish
        Staff
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        @d19dotca don't have an ETA yet. We still have many apps to port over to the base image before we can make a release. I will update this thread end of the week when I will know better how much ground we have covered.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          malvim
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Sounds awesome! You guys rock.

          I've had an interest in multi-host support forever, but haven't been following the discussions as of late. Curious about how billing and support will work.

          Is this a single dashboard for multiple cloudrons, so that we'll pay for each one separately? Or is it a single cloudron with multi-host capabilities, so that we just throw a bunch of machines on a single cloudron install and it just does its thing?

          Thanks!

          girishG 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • M malvim

            Sounds awesome! You guys rock.

            I've had an interest in multi-host support forever, but haven't been following the discussions as of late. Curious about how billing and support will work.

            Is this a single dashboard for multiple cloudrons, so that we'll pay for each one separately? Or is it a single cloudron with multi-host capabilities, so that we just throw a bunch of machines on a single cloudron install and it just does its thing?

            Thanks!

            girishG Offline
            girishG Offline
            girish
            Staff
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            @malvim said in What's coming in Cloudron 7.0:

            I've had an interest in multi-host support forever, but haven't been following the discussions as of late. Curious about how billing and support will work.
            Is this a single dashboard for multiple cloudrons, so that we'll pay for each one separately? Or is it a single cloudron with multi-host capabilities, so that we just throw a bunch of machines on a single cloudron install and it just does its thing?

            We want to implement the latter i.e it's basically a single cloudron with multi-host capabilities, where you can add nodes to a single Cloudron install. As for pricing/billing, there will be some per-node pricing component to our existing pricing. I don't have the exact details yet.

            marcusquinnM 1 Reply Last reply
            6
            • girishG girish

              @malvim said in What's coming in Cloudron 7.0:

              I've had an interest in multi-host support forever, but haven't been following the discussions as of late. Curious about how billing and support will work.
              Is this a single dashboard for multiple cloudrons, so that we'll pay for each one separately? Or is it a single cloudron with multi-host capabilities, so that we just throw a bunch of machines on a single cloudron install and it just does its thing?

              We want to implement the latter i.e it's basically a single cloudron with multi-host capabilities, where you can add nodes to a single Cloudron install. As for pricing/billing, there will be some per-node pricing component to our existing pricing. I don't have the exact details yet.

              marcusquinnM Offline
              marcusquinnM Offline
              marcusquinn
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              @girish The most interesting thing about this is the way most hosts charge less per CPU/RAM for the smaller VPS tiers to capture people price-comparing.

              It might be something that pays for itself, where growing single VPS CPU/RAM can be exponentially costly. 🤔

              Web Design https://www.evergreen.je
              Development https://brandlight.org
              Life https://marcusquinn.com

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • girishG Offline
                girishG Offline
                girish
                Staff
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                Most of the apps are updated to the new base image, yay! That was a lot of work 🙂 but atleast we can be confident that the apps work with the latest databases. So, we will push out a 6.2 release very soon with the following:

                • Move apps to new base image v3 - See https://forum.cloudron.io/topic/4366/docker-base-image-3-0
                • Database upgrades - MySQL 8, Postgres 12, Redis 5, Mongo DB 4.2.
                • Update node to 14.15.4
                • Update docker to 20.10.3
                • Make it possible to restore without updating DNS. This is useful if you want to test out cloudron backups.
                • Add a way to manage apps <-> groups better. Currently, it's hard to get a grip on what apps a user/group has access to easily (maybe add filters as well).
                • TLS addon (for DoT in AdguardHome)
                1 Reply Last reply
                9
                • girishG Offline
                  girishG Offline
                  girish
                  Staff
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Just finished up on the "Dry run" feature for Cloudron restore. You can use this to test your backups, test migrate to another server to see how well the server performs (for example, when you switch VPS) etc.

                  The way it works is :

                  • you select this "Dry run" checkbox. When enabled, it will restore as always except it won't update the DNS.

                    10a0d367-6376-487d-b8d9-aeb4991fc6be-image.png

                  • Before you click 'Restore', add an entry in /etc/hosts for my.domain.com to this new server's IP. You probably also want to add entries for your app domains if you want to test them.

                  • Once restored, and you feel happy, you can "switch over" to this new server, using the new sync DNS feature. This is in the Domains view.

                    8dacc54f-a980-4aea-acc5-b11df7885e51-image.png

                  ruihildtR 1 Reply Last reply
                  12
                  • girishG girish

                    Just finished up on the "Dry run" feature for Cloudron restore. You can use this to test your backups, test migrate to another server to see how well the server performs (for example, when you switch VPS) etc.

                    The way it works is :

                    • you select this "Dry run" checkbox. When enabled, it will restore as always except it won't update the DNS.

                      10a0d367-6376-487d-b8d9-aeb4991fc6be-image.png

                    • Before you click 'Restore', add an entry in /etc/hosts for my.domain.com to this new server's IP. You probably also want to add entries for your app domains if you want to test them.

                    • Once restored, and you feel happy, you can "switch over" to this new server, using the new sync DNS feature. This is in the Domains view.

                      8dacc54f-a980-4aea-acc5-b11df7885e51-image.png

                    ruihildtR Offline
                    ruihildtR Offline
                    ruihildt
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    That's great!

                    Will you potentially lose some data during the backup/restore time that won't be carried over to the new one if you're running "dynamic" apps (like a forum)?

                    imc67I girishG 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • ruihildtR ruihildt

                      That's great!

                      Will you potentially lose some data during the backup/restore time that won't be carried over to the new one if you're running "dynamic" apps (like a forum)?

                      imc67I Online
                      imc67I Online
                      imc67
                      translator
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      @ruihildt I was thinking the same! For example emails getting in to the old server will be lost I guess.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ruihildtR ruihildt

                        That's great!

                        Will you potentially lose some data during the backup/restore time that won't be carried over to the new one if you're running "dynamic" apps (like a forum)?

                        girishG Offline
                        girishG Offline
                        girish
                        Staff
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        @ruihildt yes, any data generated between the switch over is lost.

                        imc67I 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • girishG girish

                          @ruihildt yes, any data generated between the switch over is lost.

                          imc67I Online
                          imc67I Online
                          imc67
                          translator
                          wrote on last edited by imc67
                          #22

                          @girish wouldn't it be a good idea to have something like a "pause switch" all it does is (don't know technically):

                          1. "freeze" all the containers,
                          2. then make a backup,
                          3. migrate to new server,
                          4. do some testing and
                          5. switch DNS
                          6. finally "un-freeze / un-pause" all the containers on the new server (leaving the old one freezed)

                          Between 1 and 6 you can show the now already available and customizable custom_pages and incoming mail is already buffered at the sender.

                          d19dotcaD 1 Reply Last reply
                          4
                          • imc67I imc67

                            @girish wouldn't it be a good idea to have something like a "pause switch" all it does is (don't know technically):

                            1. "freeze" all the containers,
                            2. then make a backup,
                            3. migrate to new server,
                            4. do some testing and
                            5. switch DNS
                            6. finally "un-freeze / un-pause" all the containers on the new server (leaving the old one freezed)

                            Between 1 and 6 you can show the now already available and customizable custom_pages and incoming mail is already buffered at the sender.

                            d19dotcaD Offline
                            d19dotcaD Offline
                            d19dotca
                            wrote on last edited by d19dotca
                            #23

                            @imc67 This is easy to do manually in the meantime, but yes I agree it'd be awesome to have this process sort of automated. For me it's mostly just email I focus on that's likely to change between backup and restore, so I do a full system backup and once it gets to the "box" part of the backup I disable the mail container so that it won't receive mail after the backup. Helps a lot. Of course doing this if you have clients relying heavily on email like I do then it means you have to do this in the middle of the night though lol. The ability to automate this process would be awesome.

                            --
                            Dustin Dauncey
                            www.d19.ca

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • girishG Offline
                              girishG Offline
                              girish
                              Staff
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              @imc67 Ah yes, we used to call this "retire" back in the managed hosting days 🙂 We used to show a page that the server is migrating. Incidentally, I just removed the retire script last night! It's really just systemctl stop docker box but of course these days you will see a "app is down page" instead of a better "migration in progress" page.

                              I have created https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/issues/774 but it won't make it to this release.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              8
                              • d19dotcaD Offline
                                d19dotcaD Offline
                                d19dotca
                                wrote on last edited by d19dotca
                                #25

                                I installed and ran 6.2 this evening. So far it's looking great. Loving the changes and improvements. Especially happy with the 'missing backup' cleanup task 😉 So far so good! Thanks for all the hard work you guys! 🙂


                                One word of caution for anyone who hasn't upgraded to 6.2 (pre-release) yet... the downtime experienced during this upgrade was significantly higher than normal. Usually upgrades of Cloudron have practically no noticeable downtime or if it does it's only for a couple of minutes, but this time the upgrade took around 20-25 minutes before everything was running again which I'm sure (based on the logs) was because of the major version changes for MySQL, Postgres, Redis, etc. So just be prepared for a larger downtime during this upgrade.


                                Edit: I may have spoken too soon with regards to backups... running into two different issues with it now after upgrade to 6.2.

                                --
                                Dustin Dauncey
                                www.d19.ca

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • girishG Offline
                                  girishG Offline
                                  girish
                                  Staff
                                  wrote on last edited by girish
                                  #26

                                  I can confirm the bug. Those on OVH object storage for backups should not update to 6.2. Note that only the backup entries in the local database are removed, the backups itself are intact in OVH Storage. However, this means that Cloudron won't "clean up" the backups in remote storage properly since it has lost track of them.

                                  Fix is coming in 6.2.1.

                                  humptydumptyH 1 Reply Last reply
                                  4
                                  • girishG girish

                                    I can confirm the bug. Those on OVH object storage for backups should not update to 6.2. Note that only the backup entries in the local database are removed, the backups itself are intact in OVH Storage. However, this means that Cloudron won't "clean up" the backups in remote storage properly since it has lost track of them.

                                    Fix is coming in 6.2.1.

                                    humptydumptyH Offline
                                    humptydumptyH Offline
                                    humptydumpty
                                    wrote on last edited by humptydumpty
                                    #27

                                    @girish I closed the upgrade notification by mistake. What's the changelog for v6.2.1?

                                    Edit: Nevermind! I found it in the "Event Log".

                                        "version": "6.2.1",
                                        "changelog": [
                                          "ovh: object storage URL has changed from s3 to storage subdomain",
                                          "ionos: add profit bricks object storage",
                                          "update node to 14.15.4",
                                          "update docker to 20.10.3",
                                          "new base image 3.0.0",
                                          "postgresql updated to 12.5",
                                          "redis updated to 5.0.7",
                                          "dovecot updated to 2.3.7",
                                          "proxyAuth: fix docker UA detection",
                                          "registry config: add UI to disable it",
                                          "update solr to 8.8.1",
                                          "firewall: fix issue where script errored when having more than 15 wl/bl ports",
                                          "If groups are used, do not allow app installation without choosing the access settings",
                                          "tls addon",
                                          "Do not overwrite existing DMARC record",
                                          "Sync dns records",
                                          "Dry run restore",
                                          "linode: show cloudron is installing when user SSHs",
                                          "mysql: disable bin logs",
                                          "Show cancel task button if task is still running after 2 minutes",
                                          "filemanager: fix various bugs involving file names with spaces",
                                          "Change Referrer-policy default to 'same-origin'",
                                          "rsync: preserve and restore symlinks",
                                          "Clean up backups function now removes missing backups",
                                          "Avoid updown notifications on full restore",
                                          "Add retries to downloader logic in installer"
                                    
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • P p44

                                      @girish said in What's coming in Cloudron 7.0:

                                      Multihost support. i.e you can have many servers and have a single dashboard to manage users, apps and domains - https://git.cloudron.io/cloudron/box/-/issues/142

                                      Great!

                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      A Former User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      @p44 Multihost support sounds amazing. It'll make Cloudron unstoppable I think.

                                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • ? A Former User

                                        @p44 Multihost support sounds amazing. It'll make Cloudron unstoppable I think.

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        p44
                                        translator
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #29

                                        @af

                                        @A Former User said in What's coming in Cloudron 7.0:

                                        @p44 Multihost support sounds amazing. It'll make Cloudron unstoppable I think.

                                        Totally agree on this point!! I'm sure Cloudron team will do an amazing work!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • girishG Offline
                                          girishG Offline
                                          girish
                                          Staff
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #30

                                          We started rolling out 6.2 over the last week, I think it will take until mid next week for the full roll out. As a heads up, there are two known regressions:

                                          • Renew all certs button does not work in the Domains view.
                                          • Linode Object Storage backups does not work . Trying to work out a fix upstream - https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js/issues/3404
                                          humptydumptyH 1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Bookmarks
                                          • Search