Has anyone set up Nextcloud with a Hetzner Storagebox cifs mount as primary storage?

[andreasdueren]

@msbt said in Has anyone set up Nextcloud with a Hetzner Storagebox cifs mount as primary storage?:

Ok so quick update here: I was following the mount procedure from the first link and it's looking good! However, I started with a fresh installation instead of moving my files around, but seeing as it worked out, migrating an existing installation should be no problem either.

So what I did:

• deployed a new Cloudron with Nextcloud installed on a fresh CPX21 on Hetzner Cloud (kept it at 40GB though, might scale down if performance allows it)
• mounted a 5TB Hetzner Storagebox via sshfs into /mnt/cloud and added it as Cloudron volume (/media/cloud)
• mounted that volume into the Nextcloud app (uncheck read-only)
• change the datadirectory in config/config.php from 'datadirectory' => '/app/data', to 'datadirectory' => '/media/cloud',
• cp -r /app/data/admin to the mounted volume and touch .ocdata in /media/cloud

That's pretty much it I reckon, if you log in now you have this extra storage available:

I have both, uploaded a few GB manually and the rest via sync client, no errors so far. A restart won't change the datadirectory, so this should continue working after reboots. Encryption is also enabled and working as intended, still waiting for something that doesn't work properly.

Thank you so much for the documentation! Could you maybe explain how you mounted the volume via ssh? I added it directly via cloudron and that doesn't seem to work. I can move files there and change the directory but nextcloud is not able to write on it.

[andreasdueren]

@andreasdueren It won't show it as a proper volume either.

Plus for some reason my internal volume is now almost completely full with mystery data.

[msbt]

@andreasdueren I've mounted it via volumes after getting rid of fstab

[marcusquinn]

It looks like Hetzner are now pretty-much doing this exact same thing for their "Storage Share" solution:

• https://www.hetzner.com/storage/storage-share

@girish I think this needs to be a core feature of Cloudron, given the cost-efficiency, scaleability, and additional backup snapshots this offers for very little €s compared to things like GDrive & Dropbox per-user pricing.

[jcgonnard]

@msbt
Hi

I got a similar configuration with a CPX21 instance connected to a BX21 Storagebox.
While transfer speed for large files is fine, transfer speed for large amount of small files is horrible:

root@nextcloud:~# for f in {1..2000}; do mktemp ; done 
/tmp/tmp.qabMyUDO5N
/tmp/tmp.QPuk8CcXSB
/tmp/tmp.NhErmerWFl
/tmp/tmp.CtkY3jvTbL
[...]

root@nextcloud:~# time cp /tmp/tmp.* /backups/test/
real	4m20.998s
user	0m0.061s
sys	0m0.565s

root@nextcloud:~# time rm -fr /backups/test/*
real	1m36.682s
user	0m0.050s
sys	0m0.196s

Are you experiencing the same behaviour ?

[robi]

@jcgonnard many factors influence the availability of IO on the system.

Shared systems get busy.

See what is available with dd:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test1.img bs=1G count=1 oflag=dsync ; rm /tmp/test1.img

[jcgonnard]

@jcgonnard

SSHFS:

root@nextcloud:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/backups/test.img bs=1G count=1 oflag=dsync
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 50.1201 s, 21.4 MB/s
root@nextcloud:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/backups/test.img bs=4M count=250 oflag=dsync
250+0 records in
250+0 records out
1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 78.6863 s, 13.3 MB/s
root@nextcloud:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/backups/test.img bs=1 count=1000 oflag=dsync
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1000 bytes (1.0 kB) copied, 70.862 s, 0.0 kB/s

LOCAL:

root@nextcloud:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test.img bs=1G count=1 oflag=dsync
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 0.863714 s, 1.2 GB/s
root@nextcloud:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test.img bs=4M count=250 oflag=dsync
250+0 records in
250+0 records out
1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 1.31499 s, 797 MB/s
root@nextcloud:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/test.img bs=1 count=1000 oflag=dsync
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1000 bytes (1.0 kB) copied, 0.500667 s, 2.0 kB/s

As I said, transfer speed for medium/big files is fine enough, the problem is for small files.
I just asked if some of you experienced the same issue with the same configuration (hetzner VM + storagebox) and if there is a way to improve performances or if I need to find something else that would match my needs

[robi]

@jcgonnard that is pretty good performance for SSHFS.

You'll have to switch to a different mount option to increase small file performance, unless you can get all your small files to stream over via tar/zip/etc.

[MooCloud_Matt]

@marcusquinn
Hetzner don't use remote storage use remote clustered DB + local storage.
So it's not possible to compare the 2 installs cloudron + storagebox and hetzner storageshare, performance will be a lot better on storageshare, in order of magnitude especially on small files.

[msbt]

@jcgonnard I can't really tell, it's always running in the background and I haven't encountered any issues so far

[MooCloud_Matt]

@msbt
the issue could start with a lot of concurrent users and a lot of small changes to file, due to SMB not working at FS lvl but at file level/block of data.
IF hetzner would offer NFS, that could be a solution or better even if there would be support for iscsi.

[JOduMonT]

I would recommend you to use WebDAV instead of CIFS
it will be faster as WebDAV is more modern and appropriate for extended network (non LAN).