Mixpost
-
Got an email saying this is now V1.0.1 official launch/release
(although they seem to have forgotten to remove the notice that not yet released ).Iām excited to announce the launch of Mixpost Lite v1.0.1 š This release marks an important milestone for me as it is Mixpost's first official release. There are three ways to install Mixpost Lite: In an existing Laravel app: https://github.com/inovector/mixpost As a standalone app: https://github.com/inovector/MixpostApp With a Docker image: https://hub.docker.com/r/inovector/mixpost If you have any questions or feedback, please don't hesitate to get in touch by replying to this email. It is the first released version, if bugs appear, please be patient and understanding. I'm continuously committed to improving Mixpost and providing users with the best possible experience. -
@timconsidine I got the same email and just came here to post the same thing.
Your code block quote doesn't have clickable links, so for good measure:
There are three ways to install Mixpost Lite:
In an existing Laravel app: https://github.com/inovector/mixpost
As a standalone app: https://github.com/inovector/MixpostApp
With a Docker image: https://hub.docker.com/r/inovector/mixpost -
I signed up for a Pro Team license and sent the developer (Dima) a message about Cloudron. He said he's thinking of adding Mixpost to the CR appstore! No ETA (didn't ask) but that's still good news nonetheless.
-
@humptydumpty you've just reminded me he was going to knock up a demo for me to play with! But then I never went back to the Discord chat where he said that... whoops
-
@humptydumpty said in Mixpost:
I signed up for a Pro Team license and sent the developer (Dima) a message about Cloudron. He said he's thinking of adding Mixpost to the CR appstore! No ETA (didn't ask) but that's still good news nonetheless.
I just asked about that too and he said:
I plan to adapt Mixpost for Cloudron. But after I launch Pro Team. Because I want to succeed with what I promised. Then I will take care of Cloudron and other requirements.
Sounds good to me!
-
@jdaviescoates That's awesome. Thanks for following up with him. Did you get to try the demo?
-
@humptydumpty said in Mixpost:
Did you get to try the demo?
Yes, I did! I think I'm sold.
Gonna play a bit more but I think I'll also buy the Pro Team lifetime deal.
-
@jdaviescoates said in Mixpost:
@humptydumpty said in Mixpost:
I signed up for a Pro Team license and sent the developer (Dima) a message about Cloudron. He said he's thinking of adding Mixpost to the CR appstore! No ETA (didn't ask) but that's still good news nonetheless.
I just asked about that too and he said:
I plan to adapt Mixpost for Cloudron. But after I launch Pro Team. Because I want to succeed with what I promised. Then I will take care of Cloudron and other requirements.
Sounds good to me!
It's officially on the roadmap!
-
@jdaviescoates Feel free to ask the devs to join here and we can help out.
-
@girish I think they likely will when they get to it. Their plan is to deliver what they've already promised, i.e. from the pricing page on their website:
We expected to launch Mixpost PRO in a couple of months (Mixpost PRO Team by the end of Q1, 2023, and Mixpost PRO SaaS by the end of Q2, 2023).
And then work on a Cloudron app. So it won't be for a while.
But they are already aware of this thread and I've pointed them to the pinned app packaging post too
-
I got a message from Dima yesterday. The alpha version of Mixpost Pro Team is out. Laravel installation instructions are here.
-
There's a doc page about installing Mixpost on/with/via(?) docker: https://docs.inovector.com/books/mixpost-pro-team/page/using-docker-image
How complicated is packaging this app?
-
@humptydumpty said in Mixpost:
Mixpost Pro Team is out.
I'm gutted I missed the "pro for life" Early Adopter deal
Oh, and the Early Adopter of the SaaS deal has gone up in price significantly too
-
@jdaviescoates I thought you were going to snatch a license after playing with the demo. What happened?
-
@humptydumpty yeah, I was, but it just slipped through the net. I've been both busy and ill quite a lot recently
-
@jdaviescoates You should email Dima about it. You were in direct comms with him during the offer period on discord and on the roadmap site offering suggestions. I doubt he'll refuse your request. I hope you're feeling better!
-
H humptydumpty referenced this topic on
-
@girish I contacted Dima regarding the Pro Team packaging and he said that would require a separate package than the lite because he's unsure what Cloudron's policy is regarding paid software. Is it an issue to have a paid-only app in the CR appstore?
Quoting Dima just in case I misunderstood him:
Hi, I'll need to create separate Cloudron support for Mixpost Pro. But I still don't know their policy regarding paid software, for this reason, I didn't include it on the Mixpost Pro roadmap list.
-
Hi everyone!
I am the creator of Mixpost. Nice to see this discussion here.
Mixpost Lite and Pro have been released and I'm ready to have a discussion about listing these apps in the Cloudron Store.
@girish What are the steps and conditions necessary to list the applications on the Cloudron store?
-
Hi @lao9s Usually to list it in the Cloudron Store it's just needed to create an App Package that is adjusted to the Cloudron System. Here is the Documentation/Tutorial
The main work here is to install Mixpost to a new Docker Image which is based on the official Cloudron Docker Image. There are some special requirements because of this, eg. only /tmp /run and /app/data is writable for the App.
-
@lao9s Welcome here!
Is the Lite edition upgradable to Pro with a key? Or alternately, can the Pro start up as Lite without a key and go from there? For our packages, it would be best if the package does something without a key. Otherwise, it's hard to test updates (if the UI just show anything without a key).
That would be the ideal instead of having two separate packages to test. We have many non-free apps, so it's not a problem. Like confluence, ctfreak, minecraft, valheim, n8n, onlyoffice ee, to name a few.
